Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The difference between being Jewish and not being Jewish, is that as a Jew, you are obligated in 613 commandments, as opposed to only 7 Noachide laws that all people are obligated in.
A conversion that is acceptable by all is one where the convert takes upon himself/herself obligation to adhere to Jewish law and keep all the 613.
Before taking on such an obligation, one must be fully aware of what the obligation is, and one must be sincere in accepting this obligation.
One can be a great person, and a great friend without obligation to the 613.
If one is serious about this obligation, then circumcision, for a man, is just one of those 613. Frankly, keeping the laws of Sabbath, or pure speech are much harder, as they are ongoing, as opposed to the"one and done" circumcision. And yes, I am a woman. (With two circumcised sons).
Can a person convert and then become a nominal jew? Will the conversion come under suspicion if that happens?
Why would you do that?
If you are interested in marriage to a jew, and they are serious about their Judaism, then they'll expect a Jewish household that adheres to Jewish law. If they are not serious about their Judaism, then insisting that their spouse convert is hypocritical.
Don't convert just to appease someone. Don't change just to please someone else.
If you were not raised in those circles, you feel like a stranger. As you get older, the religiousness just starts to get old
If you were used to a non-religious life growing up, eventually you get tired of putting on the show
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The difference between being Jewish and not being Jewish, is that as a Jew, you are obligated in 613 commandments, as opposed to only 7 Noachide laws that all people are obligated in.
A conversion that is acceptable by all is one where the convert takes upon himself/herself obligation to adhere to Jewish law and keep all the 613.
Before taking on such an obligation, one must be fully aware of what the obligation is, and one must be sincere in accepting this obligation.
One can be a great person, and a great friend without obligation to the 613.
If one is serious about this obligation, then circumcision, for a man, is just one of those 613. Frankly, keeping the laws of Sabbath, or pure speech are much harder, as they are ongoing, as opposed to the"one and done" circumcision. And yes, I am a woman. (With two circumcised sons).
Can a person convert and then become a nominal jew? Will the conversion come under suspicion if that happens?
Why would you do that?
If you are interested in marriage to a jew, and they are serious about their Judaism, then they'll expect a Jewish household that adheres to Jewish law. If they are not serious about their Judaism, then insisting that their spouse convert is hypocritical.
Don't convert just to appease someone. Don't change just to please someone else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The difference between being Jewish and not being Jewish, is that as a Jew, you are obligated in 613 commandments, as opposed to only 7 Noachide laws that all people are obligated in.
A conversion that is acceptable by all is one where the convert takes upon himself/herself obligation to adhere to Jewish law and keep all the 613.
Before taking on such an obligation, one must be fully aware of what the obligation is, and one must be sincere in accepting this obligation.
One can be a great person, and a great friend without obligation to the 613.
If one is serious about this obligation, then circumcision, for a man, is just one of those 613. Frankly, keeping the laws of Sabbath, or pure speech are much harder, as they are ongoing, as opposed to the"one and done" circumcision. And yes, I am a woman. (With two circumcised sons).
Can a person convert and then become a nominal jew? Will the conversion come under suspicion if that happens?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The difference between being Jewish and not being Jewish, is that as a Jew, you are obligated in 613 commandments, as opposed to only 7 Noachide laws that all people are obligated in.
A conversion that is acceptable by all is one where the convert takes upon himself/herself obligation to adhere to Jewish law and keep all the 613.
Before taking on such an obligation, one must be fully aware of what the obligation is, and one must be sincere in accepting this obligation.
One can be a great person, and a great friend without obligation to the 613.
If one is serious about this obligation, then circumcision, for a man, is just one of those 613. Frankly, keeping the laws of Sabbath, or pure speech are much harder, as they are ongoing, as opposed to the"one and done" circumcision. And yes, I am a woman. (With two circumcised sons).
Can a person convert and then become a nominal jew? Will the conversion come under suspicion if that happens?
Anonymous wrote:The difference between being Jewish and not being Jewish, is that as a Jew, you are obligated in 613 commandments, as opposed to only 7 Noachide laws that all people are obligated in.
A conversion that is acceptable by all is one where the convert takes upon himself/herself obligation to adhere to Jewish law and keep all the 613.
Before taking on such an obligation, one must be fully aware of what the obligation is, and one must be sincere in accepting this obligation.
One can be a great person, and a great friend without obligation to the 613.
If one is serious about this obligation, then circumcision, for a man, is just one of those 613. Frankly, keeping the laws of Sabbath, or pure speech are much harder, as they are ongoing, as opposed to the"one and done" circumcision. And yes, I am a woman. (With two circumcised sons).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP here. Can non-Jewish people attend services?
Yes. You are welcome to do so, in general.
I do remind you that we have denominations, and they are very different.
I don't like the term "denominations" It sounds so, pardon, Protestant, and seems to imply not only differences in theology, but differences in liturgy going back 500 years, and even formal distinctions on who can participate, intermarry etc (depending on whether denominations are in communion with each other). I like the idea that there are no hard and set boundaries along the continuum of Judaism - Reform and Conservative accept each other for most if not all purposes, and there are independent shuls happily in between. Same for Conservative and at least the most liberal Orthodox shuls. Denominationalism has set in more strongly in recent years, esp as CJ has moved left halachically, O has moved right and groups like Open Orthodoxy and the Union for Traditional Judaism have remained small. Though the liturgy is less denominational, as even Reform has become more traditional. (Note there are also smaller groups, Reconstructionist and Renewal notably). But I prefer to call them movements, or, as the Israelis do, "trends". Reform and Conservative each have a grouping of institutions (synagogue associations, seminaries, youth movements, etc) but many of the most exciting things are happening with independent institutions and prayer groups.
There are a lot of words in this answer. Call them flavors, trends, denominations... whatever. For the PP who asked, you will find services extremely different among the "groups". I just reread the first sentence PP wrote, and other than the fact that our differences don't go back quite as far as Luther, I think we meet the standard she set.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP here. Can non-Jewish people attend services?
Yes. You are welcome to do so, in general.
I do remind you that we have denominations, and they are very different.
I don't like the term "denominations" It sounds so, pardon, Protestant, and seems to imply not only differences in theology, but differences in liturgy going back 500 years, and even formal distinctions on who can participate, intermarry etc (depending on whether denominations are in communion with each other). I like the idea that there are no hard and set boundaries along the continuum of Judaism - Reform and Conservative accept each other for most if not all purposes, and there are independent shuls happily in between. Same for Conservative and at least the most liberal Orthodox shuls. Denominationalism has set in more strongly in recent years, esp as CJ has moved left halachically, O has moved right and groups like Open Orthodoxy and the Union for Traditional Judaism have remained small. Though the liturgy is less denominational, as even Reform has become more traditional. (Note there are also smaller groups, Reconstructionist and Renewal notably). But I prefer to call them movements, or, as the Israelis do, "trends". Reform and Conservative each have a grouping of institutions (synagogue associations, seminaries, youth movements, etc) but many of the most exciting things are happening with independent institutions and prayer groups.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP here. Can non-Jewish people attend services?
Absolutely! I'm Jewish; DH isn't. He attends services with us, and at this point, fully participates (as much as he's comfortable).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've noticed that Judaism is the only Abrahamic faith that doesn't proselytize. I think that's cool. Why is it that Judaism doesn't proselytize though?
Traditionally, there is no reason to try to convert others. Jews believe there are certain rules and laws they need to follow to be good Jews. They believe there are certain moral imperatives you need to follow to be a good person. But, there's no spiritual or practical advantage to following Jewish practice if you aren't Jewish.
Unless you marry someone jewish, then you have to convert
The grandparents want jewish grandchildren, and unless you convert they will not be
Anonymous wrote:My sister in law converted (before she married my brother). She went to conversion classes for something like 18 months. She had to study. She wrote a few papers. She met with the rabbi several times. She had to have a ritual bath at the temple with the rabbi there. She converted through a reform temple. I don't think an Orthodox temple will help people convert.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've noticed that Judaism is the only Abrahamic faith that doesn't proselytize. I think that's cool. Why is it that Judaism doesn't proselytize though?
Traditionally, there is no reason to try to convert others. Jews believe there are certain rules and laws they need to follow to be good Jews. They believe there are certain moral imperatives you need to follow to be a good person. But, there's no spiritual or practical advantage to following Jewish practice if you aren't Jewish.
Unless you marry someone jewish, then you have to convert
The grandparents want jewish grandchildren, and unless you convert they will not be
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've noticed that Judaism is the only Abrahamic faith that doesn't proselytize. I think that's cool. Why is it that Judaism doesn't proselytize though?
Traditionally, there is no reason to try to convert others. Jews believe there are certain rules and laws they need to follow to be good Jews. They believe there are certain moral imperatives you need to follow to be a good person. But, there's no spiritual or practical advantage to following Jewish practice if you aren't Jewish.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NP here. Can non-Jewish people attend services?
Yes. You are welcome to do so, in general.
I do remind you that we have denominations, and they are very different.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I've noticed that Judaism is the only Abrahamic faith that doesn't proselytize. I think that's cool. Why is it that Judaism doesn't proselytize though?
There are probably a lot of reasons for this but a big one is that Jews were persecuted for centuries and proselytizing would have been asking for trouble. Jews were just hoping for live and let live.
An Orthodox temple will accept converts (assuming you are sincere) (although they may not accept conversion performed by a non-Orthodox rabbi).
There are no Orthodox "temples." A temple is a holy place. There have only been three Orthodox temples, the first and the second temples in Jerusalem and the temple in Elephantine. The Reform reject this idea and say that any building devoted to Jewish prayer is a temple.
1. Presumably the Temple in Elephantine was in violation of Deuteronomy as well. 2. Its kind of anachronistic to refer to the Beit Hamikdash harishon or hasheni as "orthodox" since the term originated in the 19th century. 3. As a side note, in part of the northeastern US some conservative synagogues used (and still use) the term "temple" even though (unlike Reform) they pray for the restoration of the ancient temple in Jerusalem
Temple is used a lot in the South. I grew up in Baltimore hearing it from Jews who had moved North. I never heard the term shul until college.