Anonymous wrote:How and the ____ is anything going to get done in those classes? Have you seen those classrooms? My sons was jam packed last year and he only had 22 in his class. These kids aren't going to learn a darn thing. Not to mention, these teachers are going to have a horrible time adjusting, aide or not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:K parents - rather than going after Dr. B., find your friends and neighbors who have not yet enrolled but are planning to send their kids this fall. I've heard about 4-5 additional kids whose families haven't gotten around to getting their paperwork in. This is how Dr. B can push DCPS for the added teacher and aide.
What are they waiting for?
Anonymous wrote:K parents - rather than going after Dr. B., find your friends and neighbors who have not yet enrolled but are planning to send their kids this fall. I've heard about 4-5 additional kids whose families haven't gotten around to getting their paperwork in. This is how Dr. B can push DCPS for the added teacher and aide.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:K and 1st grade both have 130 kids. Yet 1st grade has six sections of 23 kids (and had 6 sections last year too, in kindergarten). Yet this year's kindergarten has 5 enormous classes. Why the difference?
The numbers don't make any sense. K has 140 in 5 classes while 1st has 142 in 6 classes.
I typed wrong -- I meant 140, not 130. Regardless, my point (and your point) stand: K and 1st have the same number of kids; why did that number justify an additional teacher in 1st grade (and last year in K), but not this year's K?
I didn't mean your numbers but the school's rationale for waiting for more kids to add the 6th class.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:K and 1st grade both have 130 kids. Yet 1st grade has six sections of 23 kids (and had 6 sections last year too, in kindergarten). Yet this year's kindergarten has 5 enormous classes. Why the difference?
The numbers don't make any sense. K has 140 in 5 classes while 1st has 142 in 6 classes.
I typed wrong -- I meant 140, not 130. Regardless, my point (and your point) stand: K and 1st have the same number of kids; why did that number justify an additional teacher in 1st grade (and last year in K), but not this year's K?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:K and 1st grade both have 130 kids. Yet 1st grade has six sections of 23 kids (and had 6 sections last year too, in kindergarten). Yet this year's kindergarten has 5 enormous classes. Why the difference?
The numbers don't make any sense. K has 140 in 5 classes while 1st has 142 in 6 classes.
Anonymous wrote:K and 1st grade both have 130 kids. Yet 1st grade has six sections of 23 kids (and had 6 sections last year too, in kindergarten). Yet this year's kindergarten has 5 enormous classes. Why the difference?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good points! Cut the fat. Who cares about 45 min of Spanish once a week. Cut foreign language, cut an Assistant Principal or both, and cut HSA funding for things like sports uniforms and participation in Archery tournaments out of State. It is not that hard.
In DCPS, foreign language is mandatory. They cannot cut that teacher. DCPS actually gives very little flexibility in the budget now. The era of autonomy is over.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Good points! Cut the fat. Who cares about 45 min of Spanish once a week. Cut foreign language, cut an Assistant Principal or both, and cut HSA funding for things like sports uniforms and participation in Archery tournaments out of State. It is not that hard.
In DCPS, foreign language is mandatory. They cannot cut that teacher. DCPS actually gives very little flexibility in the budget now. The era of autonomy is over.
Anonymous wrote:Good points! Cut the fat. Who cares about 45 min of Spanish once a week. Cut foreign language, cut an Assistant Principal or both, and cut HSA funding for things like sports uniforms and participation in Archery tournaments out of State. It is not that hard.