Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another poster here - I also know a kid who got in for middle school because child was being bullied. Parent also happened to be a county employee but I don't know if that made a difference. Child thrived and blossomed at HB.
I also think that families who already have one child at HB get some kind of admissions bump because I know many, many families whose second child got in despite the huge odds. It seems to me more than coincidence. JMO
True, but they're not supposed to as laid out in the lottery process.
Who's not supposed to? The bullied child? There are explicit policies in place administrative placements outside of the lottery, and it can cover situations like this (e.g., if the bullied child has autism and is being moved into the HB autism program). It's not a secret.
In this case the bullied child did NOT have autism, just had issues fitting in with the general school population. As I said the kid thrived at HB but only got in because parents lobbied for admission. So I know for a fact that kids get into HB without going through lottery or being admitted through the autism program.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another poster here - I also know a kid who got in for middle school because child was being bullied. Parent also happened to be a county employee but I don't know if that made a difference. Child thrived and blossomed at HB.
I also think that families who already have one child at HB get some kind of admissions bump because I know many, many families whose second child got in despite the huge odds. It seems to me more than coincidence. JMO
True, but they're not supposed to as laid out in the lottery process.
Who's not supposed to? The bullied child? There are explicit policies in place administrative placements outside of the lottery, and it can cover situations like this (e.g., if the bullied child has autism and is being moved into the HB autism program). It's not a secret.
Sorry, sibling preference. No issue with the kid being bullied or the ASD program which I "think" is separate from the lottery, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Is it an open public double blind lottery like DC charters?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is all kind of the point. There's so much we don't know, so many facts are hidden. It just seems to stink too much to be legitimate. And honestly, even it were legit, I don't think APS should have a limited enrollment program.
Should we also do away with all of the choice/countywide programs? No Claremont/Key/Gunston/Wakefield immersion, no ATS, no Drew/Gunston Montessori, no Campbell, no Wakefield AP, no W-L IB?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another poster here - I also know a kid who got in for middle school because child was being bullied. Parent also happened to be a county employee but I don't know if that made a difference. Child thrived and blossomed at HB.
I also think that families who already have one child at HB get some kind of admissions bump because I know many, many families whose second child got in despite the huge odds. It seems to me more than coincidence. JMO
True, but they're not supposed to as laid out in the lottery process.
Who's not supposed to? The bullied child? There are explicit policies in place administrative placements outside of the lottery, and it can cover situations like this (e.g., if the bullied child has autism and is being moved into the HB autism program). It's not a secret.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I don't think my behavior is awful, and I think I'm pretty nice. I'm just tired of paying this program that we can't afford where some kids are more equal than others. It's bad enough when admissions are fair, but if it's not fair, it's unacceptable. I think most people would agree with me.
How much more is H-B per student than other MSs/HSs?
Costs aside, there should be more fairness and transparency around the lottery/admissions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But are admissions really rigged?
No, they're not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only way they can get away with limited enrollment is to make it fair. But it isn't. APS should shut the whole program down.
What determines fair? How do you know that the reasons for the small number of students who get in other than through the application process weren't placed there for very good reasons? It truly is a small number, last school year, of the 244 middle school students at HB Woodlawn, 241 came in through the application process and 3 through administrative placement. At the high school level, out of 443 total students, 4 were there by administrative/special placement, and 439 by the countywide lottery. I'm sorry your child didn't make it into HB Woodlawn, but the placements of these students in the school weren't the reason.
Anonymous wrote:It's not a secret, just look at the transfer reports from APS and they'll show that while most come from the usual application/transfer process, there are a handful of people who go there due to placement by the administration outside the regular process. There are a variety of reasons why someone might be placed there outside the process, and those reasons aren't anyone else's business.
Anonymous wrote:This is all kind of the point. There's so much we don't know, so many facts are hidden. It just seems to stink too much to be legitimate. And honestly, even it were legit, I don't think APS should have a limited enrollment program.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Another poster here - I also know a kid who got in for middle school because child was being bullied. Parent also happened to be a county employee but I don't know if that made a difference. Child thrived and blossomed at HB.
I also think that families who already have one child at HB get some kind of admissions bump because I know many, many families whose second child got in despite the huge odds. It seems to me more than coincidence. JMO
True, but they're not supposed to as laid out in the lottery process.
Who's not supposed to? The bullied child? There are explicit policies in place administrative placements outside of the lottery, and it can cover situations like this (e.g., if the bullied child has autism and is being moved into the HB autism program). It's not a secret.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only way they can get away with limited enrollment is to make it fair. But it isn't. APS should shut the whole program down.
What determines fair? How do you know that the reasons for the small number of students who get in other than through the application process weren't placed there for very good reasons? It truly is a small number, last school year, of the 244 middle school students at HB Woodlawn, 241 came in through the application process and 3 through administrative placement. At the high school level, out of 443 total students, 4 were there by administrative/special placement, and 439 by the countywide lottery. I'm sorry your child didn't make it into HB Woodlawn, but the placements of these students in the school weren't the reason.
We didn't even apply. I am so opposed to this school I wouldn't want it if we did get in. I think it stinks, and I don't like paying for your snowflake to go there.
Were you born an awful person or is this learned behavior after living in this area? Serious question.
You worry about you.
I don't think my behavior is awful, and I think I'm pretty nice. I'm just tired of paying this program that we can't afford where some kids are more equal than others. It's bad enough when admissions are fair, but if it's not fair, it's unacceptable. I think most people would agree with me.