Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm so sick of seeing the "why were they out at that hour of the night/morning?" posts (here and on social media).
Being out after dark is NOT a crime. Not even if you are under 18. Not even if you are under 18 AND have a vagina!
Attacking someone IS a crime. Killing someone IS a crime.
Focus on the actual crimes committed!
I can't believe it's 2017 and we're still victim shaming. Or that people don't understand/realize when they say things like, "why was she out so late" it IS victim shaming.
"I would never let my daughter walk at that time of night." That's great for you, but that still doesn't make what she, her friends, or their parents did wrong.
Such a tragedy.
Umm. Sometimes teens are out that late because there is not an adult presence and they are getting into trouble and doing things that they know are wrong. That is NOT the case in this particular situation - the group of teens had a reason to be out in the early morning hours. However, they apparently did meet up with a bad guy while they were out. This could have happened at any time of the day but the odds of something like this happening are probably higher in the early morning hours when there are much fewer witnesses around.
Where on earth are you getting this information? Do you have some source to back this claim up? By all accounts, it was more of a "run-in" than any kind of meeting up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least the Post had the decency to turn the comments off for their article.
The Post does nothing out of decency.
That's true. It was probably just filling up their server or something and costing them money.
Whatever their motivation, the Post is sensitive about stories and comments. I'm not surprised that there are no comments for this story.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm so sick of seeing the "why were they out at that hour of the night/morning?" posts (here and on social media).
Being out after dark is NOT a crime. Not even if you are under 18. Not even if you are under 18 AND have a vagina!
Attacking someone IS a crime. Killing someone IS a crime.
Focus on the actual crimes committed!
I can't believe it's 2017 and we're still victim shaming. Or that people don't understand/realize when they say things like, "why was she out so late" it IS victim shaming.
"I would never let my daughter walk at that time of night." That's great for you, but that still doesn't make what she, her friends, or their parents did wrong.
Such a tragedy.
Umm. Sometimes teens are out that late because there is not an adult presence and they are getting into trouble and doing things that they know are wrong. That is NOT the case in this particular situation - the group of teens had a reason to be out in the early morning hours. However, they apparently did meet up with a bad guy while they were out. This could have happened at any time of the day but the odds of something like this happening are probably higher in the early morning hours when there are much fewer witnesses around.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm so sick of seeing the "why were they out at that hour of the night/morning?" posts (here and on social media).
Being out after dark is NOT a crime. Not even if you are under 18. Not even if you are under 18 AND have a vagina!
Attacking someone IS a crime. Killing someone IS a crime.
Focus on the actual crimes committed!
I can't believe it's 2017 and we're still victim shaming. Or that people don't understand/realize when they say things like, "why was she out so late" it IS victim shaming.
"I would never let my daughter walk at that time of night." That's great for you, but that still doesn't make what she, her friends, or their parents did wrong.
Such a tragedy.
Umm. Sometimes teens are out that late because there is not an adult presence and they are getting into trouble and doing things that they know are wrong. That is NOT the case in this particular situation - the group of teens had a reason to be out in the early morning hours. However, they apparently did meet up with a bad guy while they were out. This could have happened at any time of the day but the odds of something like this happening are probably higher in the early morning hours when there are much fewer witnesses around.
Where on earth are you getting this information? Do you have some source to back this claim up? By all accounts, it was more of a "run-in" than any kind of meeting up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least the Post had the decency to turn the comments off for their article.
The Post does nothing out of decency.
That's true. It was probably just filling up their server or something and costing them money.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At least the Post had the decency to turn the comments off for their article.
The Post does nothing out of decency.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm so sick of seeing the "why were they out at that hour of the night/morning?" posts (here and on social media).
Being out after dark is NOT a crime. Not even if you are under 18. Not even if you are under 18 AND have a vagina!
Attacking someone IS a crime. Killing someone IS a crime.
Focus on the actual crimes committed!
I can't believe it's 2017 and we're still victim shaming. Or that people don't understand/realize when they say things like, "why was she out so late" it IS victim shaming.
"I would never let my daughter walk at that time of night." That's great for you, but that still doesn't make what she, her friends, or their parents did wrong.
Such a tragedy.
Umm. Sometimes teens are out that late because there is not an adult presence and they are getting into trouble and doing things that they know are wrong. That is NOT the case in this particular situation - the group of teens had a reason to be out in the early morning hours. However, they apparently did meet up with a bad guy while they were out. This could have happened at any time of the day but the odds of something like this happening are probably higher in the early morning hours when there are much fewer witnesses around.
Anonymous wrote:I'm so sick of seeing the "why were they out at that hour of the night/morning?" posts (here and on social media).
Being out after dark is NOT a crime. Not even if you are under 18. Not even if you are under 18 AND have a vagina!
Attacking someone IS a crime. Killing someone IS a crime.
Focus on the actual crimes committed!
I can't believe it's 2017 and we're still victim shaming. Or that people don't understand/realize when they say things like, "why was she out so late" it IS victim shaming.
"I would never let my daughter walk at that time of night." That's great for you, but that still doesn't make what she, her friends, or their parents did wrong.
Such a tragedy.
Anonymous wrote:I'm so sick of seeing the "why were they out at that hour of the night/morning?" posts (here and on social media).
Being out after dark is NOT a crime. Not even if you are under 18. Not even if you are under 18 AND have a vagina!
Attacking someone IS a crime. Killing someone IS a crime.
Focus on the actual crimes committed!
I can't believe it's 2017 and we're still victim shaming. Or that people don't understand/realize when they say things like, "why was she out so late" it IS victim shaming.
"I would never let my daughter walk at that time of night." That's great for you, but that still doesn't make what she, her friends, or their parents did wrong.
Such a tragedy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They say there was some sort of dispute between the driver of the car and the group of kids walking. The driver got out swinging a baseball bat and maybe knocked her down or she fell trying to get away.
It seems like a random attack, yet, the assailant abducted her. That seems unusual and particularly scary. I'm glad that they have the one suspect in custody and I hope that if there are any more suspects that they are apprehended ASAP.
My speculation based on watching/reading too many mystery and crime stories:
It's not a good idea to walk on that stretch of road to begin with but a group of teenage girls and very little to no cars, and the group was spilling into the street thinking their was no need to be as cautious as daytime.
Driver comes up quickly and the girls have to quickly move out of the way and they start shouting after the driver, maybe waving phones like they will take pics or call police.
Driver stops and confrontation ensues and driver might be drunk/tipsy and/or angry likely over something not related at all to these girls. They just fuel his anger. Maybe this girl threatens to call police and the driver gets scared. He wants to intimidate the girls and uses the baseball bat but accidentally hits the girl. The other girls have run off so he doesn't think they saw what happened. He picks her up and has the intention of getting help but maybe she dies in the car and he panics and then he leaves in her at the location she is found.
Next day he still feels guilty, thinks maybe he is wrong that she was dead and tries to go back and find her except police are there and notice him lurking around and stop to question him and then arrest him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They say there was some sort of dispute between the driver of the car and the group of kids walking. The driver got out swinging a baseball bat and maybe knocked her down or she fell trying to get away.
It seems like a random attack, yet, the assailant abducted her. That seems unusual and particularly scary. I'm glad that they have the one suspect in custody and I hope that if there are any more suspects that they are apprehended ASAP.
My speculation based on watching/reading too many mystery and crime stories:
It's not a good idea to walk on that stretch of road to begin with but a group of teenage girls and very little to no cars, and the group was spilling into the street thinking their was no need to be as cautious as daytime.
Driver comes up quickly and the girls have to quickly move out of the way and they start shouting after the driver, maybe waving phones like they will take pics or call police.
Driver stops and confrontation ensues and driver might be drunk/tipsy and/or angry likely over something not related at all to these girls. They just fuel his anger. Maybe this girl threatens to call police and the driver gets scared. He wants to intimidate the girls and uses the baseball bat but accidentally hits the girl. The other girls have run off so he doesn't think they saw what happened. He picks her up and has the intention of getting help but maybe she dies in the car and he panics and then he leaves in her at the location she is found.
Next day he still feels guilty, thinks maybe he is wrong that she was dead and tries to go back and find her except police are there and notice him lurking around and stop to question him and then arrest him.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They say there was some sort of dispute between the driver of the car and the group of kids walking. The driver got out swinging a baseball bat and maybe knocked her down or she fell trying to get away.
It seems like a random attack, yet, the assailant abducted her. That seems unusual and particularly scary. I'm glad that they have the one suspect in custody and I hope that if there are any more suspects that they are apprehended ASAP.
Still, I don't see any way this was not a hate crime under the circumstances.
Anonymous wrote:At least the Post had the decency to turn the comments off for their article.