Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Restorative justice -- such as mediation between students -- certainly works, but it costs money to hire skilled people to do it. And, if Hardy were the only school to have it, that would be inequitable because other schools would not have it. So better not do it.
What the heck is "restorative justice"? It sounds like it came from the same leftish, academic-jargon factory as "cultural appropriation," "safe spaces" and "micro-aggression."![]()
Except words like "safe space" and "micro-aggression" at least indicate what they might mean. "Restorative justice" doesn't even sound like a concept that would make sense in educational discipline. I can't guess what the term is supposed to mean. What is being restored and to whom?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Restorative justice -- such as mediation between students -- certainly works, but it costs money to hire skilled people to do it. And, if Hardy were the only school to have it, that would be inequitable because other schools would not have it. So better not do it.
What the heck is "restorative justice"? It sounds like it came from the same leftish, academic-jargon factory as "cultural appropriation," "safe spaces" and "micro-aggression."![]()
Except words like "safe space" and "micro-aggression" at least indicate what they might mean. "Restorative justice" doesn't even sound like a concept that would make sense in educational discipline. I can't guess what the term is supposed to mean. What is being restored and to whom?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Restorative justice -- such as mediation between students -- certainly works, but it costs money to hire skilled people to do it. And, if Hardy were the only school to have it, that would be inequitable because other schools would not have it. So better not do it.
What the heck is "restorative justice"? It sounds like it came from the same leftish, academic-jargon factory as "cultural appropriation," "safe spaces" and "micro-aggression."![]()
Anonymous wrote:Restorative justice -- such as mediation between students -- certainly works, but it costs money to hire skilled people to do it. And, if Hardy were the only school to have it, that would be inequitable because other schools would not have it. So better not do it.
Anonymous wrote:Hardy has had a suspension problem.
Per the last equity report, 87 of 434 students were suspended 1 or more days (none were expelled) in one school year.
The suspended students were of ALL races and demographic groups (white, black, Asian and Latino).
Anonymous wrote:I don't think he has superpowers. I'm sure he has plenty of flaws and he'll disappoint once in a while. But I do believe he's the right leader at the right time for Hardy. And for a motivated school leader, Hardy is a dream job. Not too big and a quickly growing engaged feeder school community with parents willing to step up and help precisely when DCPS has made middle school a real emphasis and priority and we have a new Chancellor anxious to hit one out of the park and make his tenure distinct from Henderson's. We're lucky but so his Mr. Cooke.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That requires resources and costs money. where, pray tell will it come from? DC teachers are leaving, not staying
You have that the wrong way around - teachers are leaving because they don't get support but they get all of the blame. It's not enough for the Chancellor to talk about reducing harsh punishment and providing minimal support for such programs. Too many principals are actively reducing harsh punishment on the backs of teachers rather than the system employing effective and compassionate discipline.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One thing that I've observed over the years, on DCUM and in real life: among a certain group of NW DC parents, there is a huge desire to see harsh punishment for kids involved in even the slightest amount of misbehavior, circumstances be damned, at Hardy or Wilson. I often wonder why they are so bloodthirsty.
It isn't a matter of being blood thirsty but a matter of age and continual problems. By middle school and definitely by high school kids know how to behave and what expectations are at school. They have had 7+ years of schooling to know what is expected. When they act out at that age it is a choice. Kids (and parents) are tired of it by then. I can tell you from our Deal feeder school, the kids who were a problem in grades 3-5 are still the most likely to be problems at Deal and Wilson. It is amazing to me.
That said Deal doesn't do harsh punishments like Hardy. There are suspensions but Deal is much more creative on punishments which don't include suspensions. With kids at Wilson now I am all about the harsh punishment. I just want them out. They are not only disruptive but some are dangerous.
But where do you send them?
Anonymous wrote:One thing that I've observed over the years, on DCUM and in real life: among a certain group of NW DC parents, there is a huge desire to see harsh punishment for kids involved in even the slightest amount of misbehavior, circumstances be damned, at Hardy or Wilson. I often wonder why they are so bloodthirsty.
Anonymous wrote:That requires resources and costs money. where, pray tell will it come from? DC teachers are leaving, not staying
Anonymous wrote:One thing that I've observed over the years, on DCUM and in real life: among a certain group of NW DC parents, there is a huge desire to see harsh punishment for kids involved in even the slightest amount of misbehavior, circumstances be damned, at Hardy or Wilson. I often wonder why they are so bloodthirsty.