Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How come Weiner is getting a few years and this guy gets 20?


http://nypost.com/2017/05/18/secret-service-agent-who-sexted-teens-from-white-house-headed-to-prison/

To be honest, I think it's a fair question. They both pleaded guilty.

My guess it is that the secret service guy had multiple counts against him. It may also depend on the jurisdiction. The fact that he was in the secret service may have been a factor. Apparently, prosecutors were seeking life in prison, which seems a little extreme. Why bother pleading when you're going to have the book thrown at you either way? I feel weird for defending a guy who sent dick picks to underage girls.

As i said up thread - multiple counts, multiple underage women, and actual effort to go meet up in person. Also, the fact that the crime was committed from a highly secure environment with law enforcement all around indicates that a "lighter" sentence is inappropriate - http://nypost.com/2015/11/19/secret-service-pervert-had-online-sex-chats-with-at-least-2-young-girls/

FWIW, while Weiner's behaviour is completely out of line, he never made any attempt to get together physically with the minor. I also think that although he's been caught texting multiple other women, they've all been over 18. To my knowledge this is the first minor for Weiner. That doesn't excuse his behaviour, but it probably does explain the sentencing differential in these two cases.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Interesting info in this report. I still think Weiner is execrable, but...

* Girl was 16, not 15, so over the age of consent in NC
* She made the first contact with Weiner
* She lied about she and her family being Clinton supporters
http://thehill.com/homenews/news/334511-report-girl-in-weiner-sexting-case-lied-to-damage-clinton#.WSMRa9vYu1U.facebook

She is a f!cking scumbag and her parents are as execrable as Weiner. Wow. They lied to get more $ from a tabloid and her dad, a practicing attorney, negotiated for payment for the girl, for the family and Sydney Leathers - known before this came out.

Her parents' actions made no sense before (selling story), but it makes sense if that's true.

This info is directly from Louise Mensch. I'm not sure how accurate it is. If it were true why would he not fight and force the 16 year old to appear in court?

Weiner is a perve and he is the root cause of the Comey letter etc. He helped put 45 in the White House. Good riddance. May he fade from notoriety forever.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody wants their child fatherless, you mean bitches.

I agree with you.......but I think he'll end up hanging himself.

Why do you think so?

There's no way someone this narcissistic will commit suicide. He's a hopeless attention whore and will likely try and reinvent himself yet again and we'll all have to endure seeing his ugly, pinched face on television.

Anonymous wrote:Interesting info in this report. I still think Weiner is execrable, but...

* Girl was 16, not 15, so over the age of consent in NC
* She made the first contact with Weiner
* She lied about she and her family being Clinton supporters
http://thehill.com/homenews/news/334511-report-girl-in-weiner-sexting-case-lied-to-damage-clinton#.WSMRa9vYu1U.facebook

She is a f!cking scumbag and her parents are as execrable as Weiner. Wow. They lied to get more $ from a tabloid and her dad, a practicing attorney, negotiated for payment for the girl, for the family and Sydney Leathers - known before this came out.

Her parents' actions made no sense before (selling story), but it makes sense if that's true.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody wants their child fatherless, you mean bitches.

I agree with you.......but I think he'll end up hanging himself.

Why do you think so?

Anthony is still a very evil pervert. Huma should come clean.

Anonymous wrote:How come Weiner is getting a few years and this guy gets 20?


http://nypost.com/2017/05/18/secret-service-agent-who-sexted-teens-from-white-house-headed-to-prison/

To be honest, I think it's a fair question. They both pleaded guilty.

My guess it is that the secret service guy had multiple counts against him. It may also depend on the jurisdiction. The fact that he was in the secret service may have been a factor. Apparently, prosecutors were seeking life in prison, which seems a little extreme. Why bother pleading when you're going to have the book thrown at you either way? I feel weird for defending a guy who sent dick picks to underage girls.

Interesting info in this report. I still think Weiner is execrable, but...

* Girl was 16, not 15, so over the age of consent in NC
* She made the first contact with Weiner
* She lied about she and her family being Clinton supporters
http://thehill.com/homenews/news/334511-report-girl-in-weiner-sexting-case-lied-to-damage-clinton#.WSMRa9vYu1U.facebook

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nobody wants their child fatherless, you mean bitches.

I agree with you.......but I think he'll end up hanging himself.

He might consider suicide, but I think his ego wouldn't let him actually do it.

Anonymous wrote:Nobody wants their child fatherless, you mean bitches.

I agree with you.......but I think he'll end up hanging himself.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given Huma's supreme loyalty to Hillary for so many years, there really wasn't much time to care for her child. Anthony had been the primary caregiver for most of Jordan's life.

What these two individuals have done to this child is horrific. Neither one is fit to provide the day to day care. Huma will outsource. She'd be bored having to put her little boy to sleep every night. She's just not the nurturing type.

You know nothing about her as a mother. Neither do I which is part of how I know you know nothing. Show some mercy.

Let's just say it. No one can have everything all at the same time. Huma opted for a grueling career on the go with Hillary.

+1 It's a sad reality that many young parents today don't get or don't want to get. No one gets to have it all. There are only 24 hours in a day. Hard choices have to be made. Some people put more time on careers than their children.

Exactly. Smart parents provide the balance by one parent with a career as the focus, while the other parent makes the children and household as the priority.

This is what I do not get. Why must one parent sacrifice their career so that the other can pursue theirs? And does being the one to stay home give the other parent the excuse to be absent?
How about both do careers with 40h work week and both care for their children

Let Hillary/Billary find some other slave

Nobody wants their child fatherless, you mean bitches.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given Huma's supreme loyalty to Hillary for so many years, there really wasn't much time to care for her child. Anthony had been the primary caregiver for most of Jordan's life.

What these two individuals have done to this child is horrific. Neither one is fit to provide the day to day care. Huma will outsource. She'd be bored having to put her little boy to sleep every night. She's just not the nurturing type.

You know nothing about her as a mother. Neither do I which is part of how I know you know nothing. Show some mercy.

Let's just say it. No one can have everything all at the same time. Huma opted for a grueling career on the go with Hillary.

+1 It's a sad reality that many young parents today don't get or don't want to get. No one gets to have it all. There are only 24 hours in a day. Hard choices have to be made. Some people put more time on careers than their children.

Exactly. Smart parents provide the balance by one parent with a career as the focus, while the other parent makes the children and household as the priority.

PP here. I agree completely.

I think this issue is important to consider in different ways.

Yes, for some couples, their children are not a priority.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Given Huma's supreme loyalty to Hillary for so many years, there really wasn't much time to care for her child. Anthony had been the primary caregiver for most of Jordan's life.

What these two individuals have done to this child is horrific. Neither one is fit to provide the day to day care. Huma will outsource. She'd be bored having to put her little boy to sleep every night. She's just not the nurturing type.

You know nothing about her as a mother. Neither do I which is part of how I know you know nothing. Show some mercy.

Let's just say it. No one can have everything all at the same time. Huma opted for a grueling career on the go with Hillary.

+1 It's a sad reality that many young parents today don't get or don't want to get. No one gets to have it all. There are only 24 hours in a day. Hard choices have to be made. Some people put more time on careers than their children.

Exactly. Smart parents provide the balance by one parent with a career as the focus, while the other parent makes the children and household as the priority.

PP here. I agree completely.

I think this issue is important to consider in different ways.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Will Weiner be able to attend his son's birthday parties or other outings with his son's friends?

I highly doubt his prison will allow him to have special outings. What do you think?

I think PP meant ever, once he is on the offender registry.

+1 Thank you.

Don't you think it'll be up to the parents involved, if a registered sex offender should be allowed near their child?