Anonymous wrote:This post is useless without knowing what schools OP is talking about. If she didn't get into the Ivy's or Amherst or other elite colleges, I'm not surprised at all, as they are essentially a lottery even for the kids with a 4.5. If you're talking about good schools for smart kids like UVA and W&M, I may be a little surprised. If you're talking about Penn State and JMU, I'm surprised.
Anonymous wrote:With grade inflation being as rampant as it is, if you don't have at least a 4.0 W/GPA, you're not really trying.
Anonymous wrote:With grade inflation being as rampant as it is, if you don't have at least a 4.0 W/GPA, you're not really trying.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wrong OP -- colleges look at the whole package. Good grades from a terrible h.s. don't mean anything. SATs matter more and ECs are considered as well. Don't write about what you don't know about.
My kid went to Princeton so we went through the whole thing. She did not have the best grades in her elite private, but she had other unique stuff for her application.
I think the process is more nuanced than that. Looking at the whole package doesn't mean that all of the elements are weighed equally. However if you have unique ECs or special talents that can tip in your kids favor and override the grades. Plus if your kid went to a selective private, that's an important point in your kid's profile. They know she could do the work.
If you look at the spread of GPA's for Princeton the majority of the kids are at the top. In Princeton's common data set for 2016-2017 86% of the freshman class had a GPA over 3.75; everyone else is below that. You can't take one example and say OP is wrong - there is too much access to actual data that clearly states otherwise.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
If you look at the spread of GPA's for Princeton the majority of the kids are at the top. In Princeton's common data set for 2016-2017 86% of the freshman class had a GPA over 3.75; everyone else is below that. You can't take one example and say OP is wrong - there is too much access to actual data that clearly states otherwise.
Spoiler alert: the 14% with under 3.75 are athletes and billionaire offspring.
True.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
If you look at the spread of GPA's for Princeton the majority of the kids are at the top. In Princeton's common data set for 2016-2017 86% of the freshman class had a GPA over 3.75; everyone else is below that. You can't take one example and say OP is wrong - there is too much access to actual data that clearly states otherwise.
Spoiler alert: the 14% with under 3.75 are athletes and billionaire offspring.
Anonymous wrote:Grade inflation is insane. Bs = Putz. All As are ten a penny. You need All As just to get a look.
Disregard the Dummy State parents on here & college confidential saying Bs or the occasional C doesn't matter.
Anonymous wrote:Wrong OP -- colleges look at the whole package. Good grades from a terrible h.s. don't mean anything. SATs matter more and ECs are considered as well. Don't write about what you don't know about.
My kid went to Princeton so we went through the whole thing. She did not have the best grades in her elite private, but she had other unique stuff for her application.
Went being the operative word here. Things have changed a lot in admissions even in the last 4 years. What was is no more.Anonymous wrote:Wrong OP -- colleges look at the whole package. Good grades from a terrible h.s. don't mean anything. SATs matter more and ECs are considered as well. Don't write about what you don't know about.
My kid went to Princeton so we went through the whole thing. She did not have the best grades in her elite private, but she had other unique stuff for her application.