Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ I don't think Michael had his cheekbones and jaw and eyes done.

He had everything done. His cheekbones and jawbones were chiseled. He was a plastic surgery addict. This is the REAL Michael Jackson.

He was handsome just the way he was. It's sad he felt such strong compulsions towards changing his appearance.

It really was sad. Thats the main reason I wonder about him being their biological father - I don't think he would risk his kids inheriting his features.

Anyone see the current cover of Bazaar magazine. It's Paris and she looks just like a young Madonna. It's kind of eerie. I'm bad at posting links but google it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ I don't think Michael had his cheekbones and jaw and eyes done.

He had everything done. His cheekbones and jawbones were chiseled. He was a plastic surgery addict. This is the REAL Michael Jackson.

He was handsome just the way he was. It's sad he felt such strong compulsions towards changing his appearance.

Anonymous wrote:Why would Michael not be the father? He didn't actually have to have sex with the mother, but he could still be the father.

Uhhh that's not what we are debating. And we know how procreation without sex works. Did you read the thread?

Anonymous wrote: I have wondered about this for a while I'm not a huge follower of the entertainment world but I understand she is Michael Jackson's daughter, correct? Is she actually half African-American because she looks so Caucasian it is intriguing to me

He said she is, she says she is, so, she is.

Poor MJ.

He had the true birthright of good looks, yet he thought enhancement would make him look better somehow.

Not to mention he got bored w/all that money.

Unfortunately the end result for him was becoming a carcature of his former self.

I don't know if she is Michael's biological child, but she definitely looks a lot like her biological Mother, Debbie Rowe.

Though much prettier.

Why would Michael not be the father? He didn't actually have to have sex with the mother, but he could still be the father.

Anonymous wrote:^ I don't think Michael had his cheekbones and jaw and eyes done.

He had everything done. His cheekbones and jawbones were chiseled. He was a plastic surgery addict. This is the REAL Michael Jackson.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This is Michael after he had s lot of work done on his face. So, no you can't count this photo.

Are there really people out there that don't know that he had so much done to his face and skin?

He had vitiligo, and it seems like the skin treatments were to deal with that (whether it was medically necessary or done because the choice was different colored splotches or consistently white skin, I don't know, but I imagine this would do a number on a person of color's self-esteem).

I think it's possible that she's his child, but unlikely. I hear the people saying that there are mixed people who look white. That does happen. But all of MJ's kids look white. The likelihood of that is very low.

I don't know if she is, but she very well could be. There are several mixed race children in my family( I'm black) and my first cousin has three daughters (their mom is white) and two of them resemble Paris.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Isn't one of the theories that Mark Lester is the bio dad?

I really don't think it's fair to have theories about the parentage of another's child, unless it affects you somehow. Otherwise, it's just a bunch of biddies, rumourmongering.

Mark Lester has gone public about it. His own daughter of roughly the same age resembles her strongly and he reached out to make a family connection and was ignored.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ I don't think Michael had his cheekbones and jaw and eyes done.

(at least at the point of the above photo)

I know it's hard for non-mixed people to understand genes sometimes, though.

That photo looks like it's from the Dangerous era and yes he'd had a lot of work done already by that point. It has nothing to do with being "non-mixed" just having 20/20 vision.

Right, but the parts of him in the Paris/Michael split photo... I don't think he had work on those areas - far part of his jaw, eyes, cheekbones. That coupled with losing facial fat from youth.

It does have a lot to do with being non-mixed - I don't think you have any idea how common it is for mixed people to get assumed as you're assuming. I'm mixed, and the comments get old. I know I'm biologically my dad's child, even if other's don't see it. I too, have 20/20 vision.

That photo is from the In the Closet video. Here's another angle. You still think the only plastic surgery he had at this point was a nose job? At minimum he also has cheek implants and a cleft chin. The jawline looks suspect too. Again, has nothing to do with being mixed - comparing this face to Paris is like apples and oranges.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ I don't think Michael had his cheekbones and jaw and eyes done.

(at least at the point of the above photo)

I know it's hard for non-mixed people to understand genes sometimes, though.

That photo looks like it's from the Dangerous era and yes he'd had a lot of work done already by that point. It has nothing to do with being "non-mixed" just having 20/20 vision.

Right, but the parts of him in the Paris/Michael split photo... I don't think he had work on those areas - far part of his jaw, eyes, cheekbones. That coupled with losing facial fat from youth.

It does have a lot to do with being non-mixed - I don't think you have any idea how common it is for mixed people to get assumed as you're assuming. I'm mixed, and the comments get old. I know I'm biologically my dad's child, even if other's don't see it. I too, have 20/20 vision.

Anonymous wrote:Isn't one of the theories that Mark Lester is the bio dad?

I really don't think it's fair to have theories about the parentage of another's child, unless it affects you somehow. Otherwise, it's just a bunch of biddies, rumourmongering.