Anonymous wrote:No names have been published. Maybe the media has names but the public doesn't.

And a presidential candidate's team having policy talks with Russia is not political, it's a matter of national security.

Flynn’s name was leaked.
Others have not been, to my knowledge, but judging from what has been said about this story, names do appear in the documents that Nunes and others have seen.

No names have been published. Maybe the media has names but the public doesn't.

And a presidential candidate's team having policy talks with Russia is not political, it's a matter of national security.

1. The sources of this information in the IC have said unmasking like this is highly unusual.

2. If the unmasking was done by Susan Rice (and it is appearing more and more like it was), why did she claim last month that she “knows nothing about this?”



And, note that she has remained silent since this information has been revealed.

3. What was the reason for the unmasking? Because, if it was purely political, she could be in deep trouble. She has some ‘splainin’ to do.

4. And, the million dollar question - Who leaked names to the press? This is a felony. And, I am sure if they identify that person or persons, he/she/they will be prosecuted.

Anonymous wrote:Just goes to show you all this is just the Obama administration going after Trump. Talk about fake news.

This news gets no coverage on CNN, NY Times, Washington Post ...

No wonder people trust wikileaks more than the fake MSM.

So much of the peaceful transfer of power

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very strange that what bothers Trumpkins is not the potential that Trump's closest advisers and inner circle may have been actively colluding with the Russians but that they were caught. Party over country, FFS.

If there was proof of this, it would have been leaked a long time ago. Like, before the election.

Panetta should have used a better password -

Way to not even get the name right of the totally OT deflection you're referring to.

Anonymous wrote:Very strange that what bothers Trumpkins is not the potential that Trump's closest advisers and inner circle may have been actively colluding with the Russians but that they were caught. Party over country, FFS.

Seriously. It's like a cheater bring mad his wife went through his phone.

She didn't unmask anyone. Nobody here knows how it's done? She can request the names be unmasked by the NSA. The NSA doesn't unmask on demand, alot harder to do than that. Stop falling for these Russian narratives.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very strange that what bothers Trumpkins is not the potential that Trump's closest advisers and inner circle may have been actively colluding with the Russians but that they were caught. Party over country, FFS.

If there was proof of this, it would have been leaked a long time ago. Like, before the election.

There was. For example, the Steele dossier on Trump came out during the campaign. But at the time, lots of people in the media ignored it because they didn't think Trump was going to win and were having more fun talking about emails and other idiocy. Now here we are, after the election, with dozens of things in the dossier now confirmed as true.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very strange that what bothers Trumpkins is not the potential that Trump's closest advisers and inner circle may have been actively colluding with the Russians but that they were caught. Party over country, FFS.

Time will tell. I have a feeling that the media will have to get on board with the truth or risk their own credibility. They will not continue to support liberal liars if they find themselves losing the battle. They will need to survive. We already see normally liberal-leaning media picking up this story.

Should be interesting.

I really hope You are a bot, because it is pitiful to go through life so willfully blind to the fact that conservative media has been feeding you lies.

I know, I'm SO pathetic. You have shamed me...NOT

PS - Do liberals really think this type of talk even works? LOL.

Gosh, no. We realize some are just too stupid to reach.

Citing Nunes in this matter is not the most trustworthy way to proceed.

Anonymous wrote:That was her job. Stop embarrassing yourself, OP. Are you the same poster who thinks the VP passes laws?

If it's her job to unmask names of US citizens, why was she lying about it?

--
Rep. Devin Nunes (R., Calif.), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, asserted in March that he had seen evidence that some of the Trump transition team's communications with foreign actors were surveilled by the Obama administration. "What I've read seems to be some level of surveillance activity, perhaps legal, but I don't know that it's right and I don't know if the American people would be comfortable with what I've read," Nunes said.

On "PBS NewsHour" on March 22, Judy Woodruff asked Rice about Nunes' claims.

"I know nothing about this," Rice responded at the time. "I was surprised to see reports from Chairman Nunes on that count today."

"So, today, I really don't know to what Chairman Nunes was referring, but he said that whatever he was referring to was a legal, lawful surveillance, and that it was potentially incidental collection on American citizens," added Rice.

Just goes to show you all this is just the Obama administration going after Trump. Talk about fake news.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very strange that what bothers Trumpkins is not the potential that Trump's closest advisers and inner circle may have been actively colluding with the Russians but that they were caught. Party over country, FFS.

If there was proof of this, it would have been leaked a long time ago. Like, before the election.

That's not proof. If someone, anyone, exposes your opponents dirty laundry, especially when it's through their own stupidity, what are you supposed to do? He should have kept his mouth shut, that would have been better.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Very strange that what bothers Trumpkins is not the potential that Trump's closest advisers and inner circle may have been actively colluding with the Russians but that they were caught. Party over country, FFS.

If there was proof of this, it would have been leaked a long time ago. Like, before the election.

If you get your news from sources other than Fox and Breitbart, you will be introduced to all sorts of sources. In fact, there are two very long threads in this forum that have hundreds of links explaining the connections.