Anonymous wrote:Omg, This thread is getting ridiculous.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are 12 years away from high school.
Do you realize how much the schools will have changed 12 years from now? I've been teaching for 14 years and the difference in MCPS from my first to this year is remarkable.
There will most definitely be redistricting because of the Downtown crown growth and what is planned on going in in that area. Also, the MCPS curriculum is getting worse and you should see the people who are currently being trained to become administrators and throwing their hats in the ring...oy.
Buy a cheaper home in a kid-friendly neighborhood and send your kid to private.
Signed,
A wootton teacher
I'm glad my kid doesn't go to Wootton HS.
Signed,
An MCPS parent
You should be.
It's awful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You are 12 years away from high school.
Do you realize how much the schools will have changed 12 years from now? I've been teaching for 14 years and the difference in MCPS from my first to this year is remarkable.
There will most definitely be redistricting because of the Downtown crown growth and what is planned on going in in that area. Also, the MCPS curriculum is getting worse and you should see the people who are currently being trained to become administrators and throwing their hats in the ring...oy.
Buy a cheaper home in a kid-friendly neighborhood and send your kid to private.
Signed,
A wootton teacher
I'm glad my kid doesn't go to Wootton HS.
Signed,
An MCPS parent
Anonymous wrote:You are 12 years away from high school.
Do you realize how much the schools will have changed 12 years from now? I've been teaching for 14 years and the difference in MCPS from my first to this year is remarkable.
There will most definitely be redistricting because of the Downtown crown growth and what is planned on going in in that area. Also, the MCPS curriculum is getting worse and you should see the people who are currently being trained to become administrators and throwing their hats in the ring...oy.
Buy a cheaper home in a kid-friendly neighborhood and send your kid to private.
Signed,
A wootton teacher
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But your child is the same kid regardless of which school they attend. I don't believe their changes of a particular college will change. Will they become smarter if they go to Wootton? No..they will just be at a school with wealthier kids who are more likely to get into good schools...won't change their own specific chances.
Maybe not. We did magnet track (no kids at Wootton or QO) for MS and HS. Coming out of MS magnet, a few of DC's friends were not accepted to HS magnets so they ended up going back to home schools. But after 4 years of HS, there was a huge difference in terms of college admissions between the kids who went to magnets vs. kids who went back to home HS. Many magnet HS kids ended up Ivy and top tier schools (or UMD with scholarship) whereas the kids went back to home HS had much less positive results. So, I don't believe PP's statement is correct.
Not surprising given that the magnet kids GOT IN to the magnets while the others were rejected.. Magnet kids obviously showed some strength over the others before HS started.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But your child is the same kid regardless of which school they attend. I don't believe their changes of a particular college will change. Will they become smarter if they go to Wootton? No..they will just be at a school with wealthier kids who are more likely to get into good schools...won't change their own specific chances.
Maybe not. We did magnet track (no kids at Wootton or QO) for MS and HS. Coming out of MS magnet, a few of DC's friends were not accepted to HS magnets so they ended up going back to home schools. But after 4 years of HS, there was a huge difference in terms of college admissions between the kids who went to magnets vs. kids who went back to home HS. Many magnet HS kids ended up Ivy and top tier schools (or UMD with scholarship) whereas the kids went back to home HS had much less positive results. So, I don't believe PP's statement is correct.