Anonymous wrote:NP here. This has been a (mostly) helpful thread.
I really feel for the OP - I am American, I went through this process myself almost 30 years ago (when by the way, "well rounded" was already OUT, at least for Suburban NJ applicants to top schools . . .) It seems like in the intervening years, the college application process has just gotten worse and more complicated. Back then, with tuition high (but not the sky-high level of today), selective colleges did not provide merit aid (with very few exceptions). Now, it seems like there's a complicated game to be played. The Ivy League and tippy-top schools provide no merit aid, but the middle tier and below of selective colleges and some flaghip state universitities, now do. So, you have to factor that in. Acceptance rates are lower than ever. Seems like a crap shoot!
My older DD is also in 7th grade. She is the one bringing up this topic with me (I've not brought it up). Just got her report card yesterday, and she has a 4.0 in MCPS (public). She asks me: "what do I have to do to get into a really great college? If I keep a 4.0 all through high school, will I get into a really good college?" I hate that my answer has to be: "If you study/work hard, I'm sure you will go to a college that will be really great for you." I think it's hard at 12 years old to have to recognize there is a luck/financial element. The rules are not clear like in Europe (do well on exam - get into good college - end of story). On the one hand, I think it's great that my DD has these dreams, but on the other hand, I don't want her to define "success" as getting into fill-in-the-blank-NAME school given the luck and financial elements at play.
Also, while I get why top schools like "pointy" kids, I take issue with this a bit. My kid is freaking 12 years old. If she wants to try a sport or activity that she's not sure about or might not excel in, she should do it! Not be held back to at 12 only participate in those things that will help build a college resume down the line. Some people have many diverse interests. This is not a bad thing!
Anonymous wrote:NP here. This has been a (mostly) helpful thread.
I really feel for the OP - I am American, I went through this process myself almost 30 years ago (when by the way, "well rounded" was already OUT, at least for Suburban NJ applicants to top schools . . .) It seems like in the intervening years, the college application process has just gotten worse and more complicated. Back then, with tuition high (but not the sky-high level of today), selective colleges did not provide merit aid (with very few exceptions). Now, it seems like there's a complicated game to be played. The Ivy League and tippy-top schools provide no merit aid, but the middle tier and below of selective colleges and some flaghip state universitities, now do. So, you have to factor that in. Acceptance rates are lower than ever. Seems like a crap shoot!
My older DD is also in 7th grade. She is the one bringing up this topic with me (I've not brought it up). Just got her report card yesterday, and she has a 4.0 in MCPS (public). She asks me: "what do I have to do to get into a really great college? If I keep a 4.0 all through high school, will I get into a really good college?" I hate that my answer has to be: "If you study/work hard, I'm sure you will go to a college that will be really great for you." I think it's hard at 12 years old to have to recognize there is a luck/financial element. The rules are not clear like in Europe (do well on exam - get into good college - end of story). On the one hand, I think it's great that my DD has these dreams, but on the other hand, I don't want her to define "success" as getting into fill-in-the-blank-NAME school given the luck and financial elements at play.
Also, while I get why top schools like "pointy" kids, I take issue with this a bit. My kid is freaking 12 years old. If she wants to try a sport or activity that she's not sure about or might not excel in, she should do it! Not be held back to at 12 only participate in those things that will help build a college resume down the line. Some people have many diverse interests. This is not a bad thing!
Anonymous wrote:Make a lot of money. There are 2 admission piles at almost all private colleges. One for students whose parents can pay 100% of tuition, room and board (50-60,000 per year) and those that need financial aid. It is easier to get accepted if you can fully pay. If you have money you can get the best tutors for your child so that if they struggle in calculus or AP biology, or with writing an essay the tutor can help. Money gets you great one in one SAT tutoring. If your child is good at a sport money gets you private coaching. That can lead to a better chance of being a recruited athlete. Affluent parents aren't looking for a sorts scholarship just a hook to make it easier to get into a top school. Being s recruited athlete does that.
So money, money, and more money. It is not an even playing field between the haves and have nots in college admisions.
Anonymous wrote:My sister went to an ivy and does alumni interviews for them. One thing she always tells me is that as "stacked" as the students' applications are, none of them get accepted - echoing a PP response about colleges not wanting a "jack of all trades, master of none" type of candidate. The universities are filling out a freshman class that is diverse - they need one really great trumpet player, one really amazing physicist, one really passionate activist, etc. They don't need - nor want - one student who has dabbled in a million things but is not passionate about anything. So to agree with many of the PPs, find out what YOUR CHILD is interested in, not what you think they should be interested in. Even I had a hard time accepting that with my children, since I grew up employing the "jack of all trades" strategy. Once I stepped back and reassessed, I find it really does work better in the long run since they are so much happier and empowered by having agency in their lives.
Anonymous wrote:My sister went to an ivy and does alumni interviews for them. One thing she always tells me is that as "stacked" as the students' applications are, none of them get accepted - echoing a PP response about colleges not wanting a "jack of all trades, master of none" type of candidate. The universities are filling out a freshman class that is diverse - they need one really great trumpet player, one really amazing physicist, one really passionate activist, etc. They don't need - nor want - one student who has dabbled in a million things but is not passionate about anything. So to agree with many of the PPs, find out what YOUR CHILD is interested in, not what you think they should be interested in. Even I had a hard time accepting that with my children, since I grew up employing the "jack of all trades" strategy. Once I stepped back and reassessed, I find it really does work better in the long run since they are so much happier and empowered by having agency in their lives.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:what if my kid's only passion is video games? how can i 'engineer' this into something presentable on his application?
How old is he? Send him to video game design and coding camp. Our DS went as a camper for 2 summers and then was a counselor for 2 summers. Have him produce a game.
He's 12 in 7th grade. any good camps you/your son recommend?
Anonymous wrote:Any good suggestions for private PSAT tutors?
. Very bigoted to imply US values and cultures are somehow inferior or do not value education--especially, since in the next breath pp will probably attavknpeopke like op for hothousing their kids...just stop already with the bigotry, not everyone if any one group shares the same values. You are a part of the problem and you are bigoted.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:9:56
FWIW, I don't think that the poster you're quoting was suggesting your attitudes harmed your child. She was just pointing out that the bragging rights/engineering your kid's life rhetoric wasn't a fair response to a parent who grew up elsewhere and was simply asking "how do things work here?"
That said, my take was that you were responding to the responses and offering OP a different perspective/approach rather than slamming her for asking the question.
FWIW, I wholeheartedly agree with the encourage your kid to do things s/he finds meaningful and to do them well advice.
Industry person here: yes, that is what I meant. Also--OP needs the process operationalized, not parenting advice, which came off as obnoxious with "the problem with this thread....". I also find it offensive because we don't know the country or culture of the OP. Give her the info she or he needs without putting US values/ideas on to them about what they are doing wrong in your eyes.
Amen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:9:56
FWIW, I don't think that the poster you're quoting was suggesting your attitudes harmed your child. She was just pointing out that the bragging rights/engineering your kid's life rhetoric wasn't a fair response to a parent who grew up elsewhere and was simply asking "how do things work here?"
That said, my take was that you were responding to the responses and offering OP a different perspective/approach rather than slamming her for asking the question.
FWIW, I wholeheartedly agree with the encourage your kid to do things s/he finds meaningful and to do them well advice.
Industry person here: yes, that is what I meant. Also--OP needs the process operationalized, not parenting advice, which came off as obnoxious with "the problem with this thread....". I also find it offensive because we don't know the country or culture of the OP. Give her the info she or he needs without putting US values/ideas on to them about what they are doing wrong in your eyes.
Anonymous wrote:what if my kid's only passion is video games? how can i 'engineer' this into something presentable on his application?