Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are a wide variety of reasons why someone may choose abortion. That is a serious decision for that person and her doctor to make. Not me. And certainly not the government.
The thing that I don't get is why pro-lifers stop caring about that life after it's born.
Why do you think they don't care?
Also I said that I am okay with abortion for extremely unfortunate circumstances. If a pregnancy is not viable or a danger to the mother, that is okay and should be legal everywhere. My issue is with frivolous abortions.
Where are the pro-lifers pushing for welfare benefits? Adopting foster children? Other services that help children?
And "frivolous" is arbitrary. It's a decision for the woman and her doctor. Your opinion doesn't matter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are a wide variety of reasons why someone may choose abortion. That is a serious decision for that person and her doctor to make. Not me. And certainly not the government.
The thing that I don't get is why pro-lifers stop caring about that life after it's born.
Why do you think they don't care?
Also I said that I am okay with abortion for extremely unfortunate circumstances. If a pregnancy is not viable or a danger to the mother, that is okay and should be legal everywhere. My issue is with frivolous abortions.
Anonymous wrote:I totally agree with you- I think it should be available in cases of abnormalities, rape of a young child etc. . I think it is personal b/c
a) its been marketed to women that they carry and bring life so they should be at the forefront of protecting children born and unborn b) Most importantly a lot of people believe that a child within the womb is just as much a person as one outside the womb and it is murder to end that life in the same way that it is murder to throw an hours old infant in a trash dumpster. Logically they are completely correct and it is gross that abortion of a 4 month fetus is used as birth control to the extent that it is.
I also belong to a faith that says that the soul enters the fetus, not the embryo , so at the beginning of the 2nd trimester and that an embryo as well as an egg or sperm carry the potential for life but are not human. We also don't permit artificial insemination by a man other than one's husband or surrugacy so each faith has its own guidelines and these are very strong. I think that its good that women who begin life begins at conception follow through on that but I think that there has to be just as a push for the welfare of those children and mothers after birth as well and also universal coverage and access, in fact a push, for birth control for couples who will not be be able raise their children independently.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are a wide variety of reasons why someone may choose abortion. That is a serious decision for that person and her doctor to make. Not me. And certainly not the government.
The thing that I don't get is why pro-lifers stop caring about that life after it's born.
Why do you think they don't care?
Also I said that I am okay with abortion for extremely unfortunate circumstances. If a pregnancy is not viable or a danger to the mother, that is okay and should be legal everywhere. My issue is with frivolous abortions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There are a wide variety of reasons why someone may choose abortion. That is a serious decision for that person and her doctor to make. Not me. And certainly not the government.
The thing that I don't get is why pro-lifers stop caring about that life after it's born.
Why do you think they don't care?
Also I said that I am okay with abortion for extremely unfortunate circumstances. If a pregnancy is not viable or a danger to the mother, that is okay and should be legal everywhere. My issue is with frivolous abortions.
Anonymous wrote:OP, if you are so pro-life, do you support widespread and thorough sex education in schools, and affordable and accessible birth control? Because unwanted pregnancies are the number one reason women have abortions, so if you can prevent those pregnancies, you can decrease the number of abortions. I find it incredulous that so many of my prolife friends do not support these measures, they only want abstinence teachings and think people should have more personal responsibility before they have sex. They don't want their insurance to pay for birth control! As if teenagers or college kids never were impulsive. As if you were never impulsive. As if you never made a mistake. Give me a break. There but for the grace of god go I. Trust other women to make their own choices.
And btw, I don't want my insurance paying for your cialis, viagra or obesity related treatment, because you couldn't "personally responsible" enough to get it up or keep from becoming fat. It's a rude thing to say isn't it? So is denying birth control.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think that the reason that it's personal for so many women is that the language used to talk about it is ALWAYS personal. Pro-choice people try to have the conversation about medical privacy and body autonomy, and they are often countered - almost immediately - with anti-abortion people calling them murderers, lazy, irresponsible, immoral, etc. It's almost impossible to have a rational conversation with anyone on this issue, because the two sides end up being "Respect my right to make my own medical decisions" and "YOU ARE A MURDERER" right out of the gate.
I'm a 35yo mother who's had an abortion and several miscarriages. Prior to my first pregnancy, I was pro-choice in general, but strongly opposed to "late term abortions" because I believed (as many do) that women should have made their decisions earlier or been more responsible in the first place. I did not understand the reasons that women seek late term abortions. I did not understand the timing issues that come into play when you are talking about ruling out genetic abnormalities. I assumed (as many do) that those abortions were a result of women being in denial about being pregnant or unable to decide to abort earlier. I read a lot. I talked to people who had late term abortions about their experiences. In the end, my mind completely changed.
At this point, I am strongly in favor of unrestricted access to abortion, in conjunction with unrestricted access to birth control and comprehensive science-based sex education in schools. I think it would be really great if every teenager was offered some form of long-lasting birth control by their primary care doctor.
I don't want people to have abortions. I don't want people to get pregnant without meaning to get pregnant. I was on birth control when I got pregnant, and I was so, so grateful that abortion was available to me as a form of birth control when my primary method (very reliable, taken for years with no issue) failed. I do not want people skipping the primary method because they know they can just "take care of it" later if they need to, but I do want the option to be there, to be accessible, and to be affordable for all women who need it.
I completely agree with every point made in your very thoughtful post.
I'm sure there are some women out there who blithely get abortions. But it is far from the majority. OP and others seem to think that tons of women are out there having wild sex with abandon, never thinking of birth control, and then saying "oops, better get an abortion, but why bother doing it soon -- I'll just wait until 6 months." That's just not reality for most women. And I don't think the government or any other individual should be deciding what is a bona fide reason or a "frivolous" reason to get one. Most women understand the seriousness of this issue and treat it accordingly.