Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How many female reporters will attend? It would be safe for the MSNBC female reporters, but not the ones from the other networks.

I think you're mistaken, it was the Trump rallies that were unsafe for female reporters.

No unsafe for keeping their jobs. Please site the link as to female reporters being beating up at Trump rallies? If you report false news because it confirms your world view and show up at a rally, people will tell you what they think.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people may feel it would be wrong of her to grab the spotlight. She spent decades serving her country. I don't think I would judge her differently if she was not ready to attend one march, the day after her opponent is sworn into office.

+1 I'm not a Hillary fan but do admire many of her accomplishments and the way she survived Bill's antics and raised a lovely daughter.

Let's be clear: She DEFENDED her husband's sexual attacks on numerous women. He even took advantage of Monica in the Oval Office.

HRC wanted to lead the United States, not a bunch of tantruming whack jobs. Why should she lead your march?

Anonymous wrote:Some people may feel it would be wrong of her to grab the spotlight. She spent decades serving her country. I don't think I would judge her differently if she was not ready to attend one march, the day after her opponent is sworn into office.

+1 I'm not a Hillary fan but do admire many of her accomplishments and the way she survived Bill's antics and raised a lovely daughter.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love HRC. But I hope she doesn't show. This March is not supposed to be about her, per se. She comes, and it turned into the sore loser brigade. Rather than focusing attention on women and minorities and immigrants and Muslims and peaceful resistance to Trump, it will shine the spotlight on HRC. We are now in a post-HRC world. We should not be giving any ammunition to the Trumpkins who meet any citicism of Trump with "sore loser" and "but Hillary". This March is about ideas and values. Not one individual person.

Seriously, blacks have to be pissed that all the liberal attention is shifting to Muslims, the minority du jour.

A few years ago it was Hispanics overtaking blacks, now the Muslims.

So now it's a popularity fight among minorities? That's healthy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Some people may feel it would be wrong of her to grab the spotlight. She spent decades serving her country. I don't think I would judge her differently if she was not ready to attend one march, the day after her opponent is sworn into office.

Serving our country? Escalating wars, unsecured server, money laundering, invading countries that were no threat to the USA, Benghazi, et al is serving the devil, not America.

ALL LIES.
She might go. She may not wish to force her self into another round of "she grabbed the spotlight! Bitch!" again. USSS might not think she should attend.

And about 80,000 more of us needed to show up than did

I'm not sure she'll be able to get out of bed

I support the March and I support Clinton too but I don't think she should come. The March isn't about her, it's about for standing up for women's rights in the face of Trump's attempts to grab at our p@ssies.

I don't think she would be deserting us if she doesn't come. She'll be letting us find our own voices. If she comes, SHE becomes the story, not the people marching. She would concentrate everyone's attention on her.

At the same time, I could understand her wanting to come to support other women. Either way, I'm not mad at her. She has sacrificed plenty. I just don't agree with people who are saying if she doesn't come, she let's everyone down. Nope.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I want to know if Madeline Albright - you know the one who said there is a special place in hell for women who don't support other women when she was urging women to vote for Hillary - will be there for the march.

This march is not a litmus test, you can support it without even marching. You can support it by marching in another march in another city/town.

You can support the march by saying it is great and wonderful to your sad sack employees and laughing when they return to their cubes, leaving the grown ups to serious business

This march deserves the hypocrisy it has generated

This march has really struck a nerve with some of you! You, for example, have been struck completely incoherent.

Yet you were able to comment on it.

?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Prediction: She will march, but it will be in NYC. The event is at the UN and so offers a nice symbolism for her past work empowering women globally, and diminishes the focus on her meaning within the US political process.

She'll come for the Inauguration ceremony because she's a gracious loser, but she will leave DC immediately afterwards.

I am thinking Qatar.....https://www.google.com/amp/s/theinternationalreporter.org/2016/10/17/hillary-clintons-sudden-move-of-1-8-billion-to-qatar-central-bank-stuns-financial-world/amp/?client=ms-android-att-us

She didn't seem very gracious on election night. She had a lot of people there who put in a lot of work campaigning and supporting her. Geeze, she could have at least said "thank you" to everyone. But no, she had to be refrained from killing poor Bill and attacking creepy Podesta.

She might be careful in Qatar. Decreased oil revenue has put a hold on their infrastructure development for the World Cup in 2020.

Anonymous wrote:How many female reporters will attend? It would be safe for the MSNBC female reporters, but not the ones from the other networks.

I think you're mistaken, it was the Trump rallies that were unsafe for female reporters.

Anonymous wrote:She will probably make an appearance because it would be held against her when she runs in 2020.

You don't really doubt that she will run again, do you?

she uses the same cleaning service I do, and they cleaned her house on Monday, so she might be overnighting it

Anonymous wrote:Love HRC. But I hope she doesn't show. This March is not supposed to be about her, per se. She comes, and it turned into the sore loser brigade. Rather than focusing attention on women and minorities and immigrants and Muslims and peaceful resistance to Trump, it will shine the spotlight on HRC. We are now in a post-HRC world. We should not be giving any ammunition to the Trumpkins who meet any citicism of Trump with "sore loser" and "but Hillary". This March is about ideas and values. Not one individual person.

Seriously, blacks have to be pissed that all the liberal attention is shifting to Muslims, the minority du jour.

A few years ago it was Hispanics overtaking blacks, now the Muslims.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I want to know if Madeline Albright - you know the one who said there is a special place in hell for women who don't support other women when she was urging women to vote for Hillary - will be there for the march.

This march is not a litmus test, you can support it without even marching. You can support it by marching in another march in another city/town.

You can support the march by saying it is great and wonderful to your sad sack employees and laughing when they return to their cubes, leaving the grown ups to serious business

This march deserves the hypocrisy it has generated

This march has really struck a nerve with some of you! You, for example, have been struck completely incoherent.

Yet you were able to comment on it.

How many female reporters will attend? It would be safe for the MSNBC female reporters, but not the ones from the other networks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Prediction: She will march, but it will be in NYC. The event is at the UN and so offers a nice symbolism for her past work empowering women globally, and diminishes the focus on her meaning within the US political process.

She'll come for the Inauguration ceremony because she's a gracious loser, but she will leave DC immediately afterwards.

I am thinking Qatar.....https://www.google.com/amp/s/theinternationalreporter.org/2016/10/17/hillary-clintons-sudden-move-of-1-8-billion-to-qatar-central-bank-stuns-financial-world/amp/?client=ms-android-att-us

She didn't seem very gracious on election night. She had a lot of people there who put in a lot of work campaigning and supporting her. Geeze, she could have at least said "thank you" to everyone. But no, she had to be refrained from killing poor Bill and attacking creepy Podesta.

Are you reading a different concession speech than I am?

http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/09/politics/hillary-clinton-concession-speech/