Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You voted for a man who spent years questioning the citizenship of a democratically elected president . Hopefully that GOD you supposedly believe in has something nice for you in return .

Not pp, but you voted for a woman who has spent years lying to the American public about important things. A woman who put her own privacy over national security

+1.

The woman who made millions through the Clinton Foundation while being Secretary of State.

Anonymous wrote:

You voted for a man who spent years questioning the citizenship of a democratically elected president . Hopefully that GOD you supposedly believe in has something nice for you in return .

Not pp, but you voted for a woman who has spent years lying to the American public about important things. A woman who put her own privacy over national security

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You voted for a man who spent years questioning the citizenship of a democratically elected president . Hopefully that GOD you supposedly believe in has something nice for you in return .

Not pp, but you voted for a woman who has spent years lying to the American public about important things. A woman who put her own privacy over national security

+1.

The woman who made millions through the Clinton Foundation while being Secretary of State.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They're stupid. What did you expect? I know several female Trump voters and the commonalities are white and stupid (thought they were smart with their BAs from no names, though). You can't squeeze blood from a stone; your expectations of these women are off base.

And you, my dear, exemplify one of the reasons I did not vote for HRC. You couldn't be more elitist if you tried. It's unfortunate that you consider yourself so much smarter than everyone else. Not to mention, embarrassing.

I like being elitist. Is that a bad word? I'm educated, make a lot of money, live in an expensive house - I am all the things that you thought you were getting if you voted for Trump. The sad part is, he likes people like me. Did he appoint any working class people to his cabinet? Hell no.

Anonymous wrote:

You voted for a man who spent years questioning the citizenship of a democratically elected president . Hopefully that GOD you supposedly believe in has something nice for you in return .

Not pp, but you voted for a woman who has spent years lying to the American public about important things. A woman who put her own privacy over national security

Anonymous wrote:Every woman in my family voted for Trump, all 7 of us. Hillary appealed to none of us. And we don't need Trump to take care of us, false. Women who vote for Hillary want the gov to hand out health care, SNAP, section 8, etc, and take care of them and their families.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman in my family voted for Trump, all 7 of us. Hillary appealed to none of us. And we don't need Trump to take care of us, false. Women who vote for Hillary want the gov to hand out health care, SNAP, section 8, etc, and take care of them and their families.

Well said.

+1

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

You voted for a man who spent years questioning the citizenship of a democratically elected president . Hopefully that GOD you supposedly believe in has something nice for you in return .

Not pp, but you voted for a woman who has spent years lying to the American public about important things. A woman who put her own privacy over national security

Lies.

And if Benghazi were so important to you, why did the Republicans hold diplomatic security funding hostage? It's almost if it doesn't matter to them at all.

Anonymous wrote:

You voted for a man who spent years questioning the citizenship of a democratically elected president . Hopefully that GOD you supposedly believe in has something nice for you in return .

Not pp, but you voted for a woman who has spent years lying to the American public about important things. A woman who put her own privacy over national security

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every woman in my family voted for Trump, all 7 of us. Hillary appealed to none of us. And we don't need Trump to take care of us, false. Women who vote for Hillary want the gov to hand out health care, SNAP, section 8, etc, and take care of them and their families.

Well said.

You voted for a man who spent years questioning the citizenship of a democratically elected president . Hopefully that GOD you supposedly believe in has something nice for you in return .

Anonymous wrote:
Nope, not angry, bitter, or delusional. Not one bit of venom in your posts! Please: pop your Valium (or whatever your therapist usually prescribes) and go to bed. Also, eat some protein. It helps.

Anonymous wrote:Every woman in my family voted for Trump, all 7 of us. Hillary appealed to none of us. And we don't need Trump to take care of us, false. Women who vote for Hillary want the gov to hand out health care, SNAP, section 8, etc, and take care of them and their families.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They're stupid. What did you expect? I know several female Trump voters and the commonalities are white and stupid (thought they were smart with their BAs from no names, though). You can't squeeze blood from a stone; your expectations of these women are off base.

They were each irrational, had low-tier jobs, and two of the younger ones were fat and slovenly, but Imm sure they would think PEOTUS would never give them the Rosie O'D 'fat pig' treatment. So they were by and large the exact LMC stereotype that liar posters on this board tried to disclaim ("DH and I have HHI of $800K, both STEM PhDs, and we love Trump." Funny how no one of that caliber was interviewed....)

To the dickpleats calling Obama 'metrosexual' - I'm sorry that a man of normal weight, on his first marriage, with a grad school degree,
is your idea of limp manhood, while a Pan-Cake coated fat fuck with pale yellow cotton candy growing out of his scalp and a lowly undergrad degree is your idea of big-wanged glory. Sad.

Nice post. Not angry, bitter, or delusional at all. As for the women in the article, you are seriously naïve - or just stupid- if you actually think the NY Times would interview high HHI, well-educated women who voted for Trump. Not on your life. That wouldn't fit their liberal, pro-HRC slant at all, now would it? We're all supposed to believe that only middle and low-class voters went for Trump. No way would any major news outlet (NYT, WashPo, HuffPo, etc.) interview anyone who doesn't fit with their narrow vision of the "Trump voter." And you know it.

Guess what? The women on this board who state they have high HHI and multiple degrees AND voted for Trump aren't lying. It's you who simply refuses to believe anything other than the stereotype liberals love to push.

Oh, *do* go get serviced, you truly need it. None of the above is remotely bitter or delusional - these UMC female voters are so ashamed of themselves that they won't share their real names with the paper of record. That's it. You know it, I know it, and more fundamentally, those women themselves know it. To have voted for Trump is to have aligned with right-wing racist extremism, low-information decision making, and wholesale irrationality, and you, I and they all bloody well know that. They don't want to be in the same article as the woman who thinks it's 'concerning' that Hill killed Vince. Because that's feces-throwing crazy, and so is that woman, and you don't want that to be your peer group - but that's the peer group, unfortunately. The perilously undereducated.

You, I and they damned well know the exclusion of all of these rich, exquisitely educated women is because the women are ashamed - not because WaPo, NYT, etc., refuse to highlight them. You are deeply delusional if you don't think the media WANT that story. They WANT to interview the Betsy DeVos who actually *earned* her money and *earned* an impressive degree, instead of marrying into a MLM family's fortune. They WANT to interview the modern day Nancy Kissinger, or Nancy Kissinger herself, who is willing to publicly say why someone phoning Taiwan is great for geopolitics. And maybe get over your paranoia about news outlets. No one's out to get you, as no one is interested in you.