Anonymous wrote:Again, the issue is not whether or not Americans buy LL Bean, it's whether its ethical for the PEOTUS to be shilling for a donor. Maybe he can just start doing sponsored tweets so at least we're clear on who's paid for access.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, the issue is not whether or not Americans buy LL Bean, it's whether its ethical for the PEOTUS to be shilling for a donor. Maybe he can just start doing sponsored tweets so at least we're clear on who's paid for access.
Liberals are boycotting it because the supported Trump. Like I said, your hate of him is more than your concern for the American workers. Liberals love their iPhones and hate of Trump more than the hard working American
Nice deflection from the fact that Trump's promotion of the brand is completely unethical, and this shit is GOING to get him impeached at some point soon. If he cared about American workers, he would not be fanning the flames of the stupid boycott. But he can't resist trying to stir the pot and throw bones to his supporters.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's so weird about Trump is that he says and does whatever occurs to him at the moment. He doesn't seem to engage his brain ever.
Telling people to purchase LL Bean goods after a LL Bean board member give Trump a load of cash MUST be illegal. Or will it be illegal only when he becomes POTUS?
Two explanations here, they're both true:
1. He doesn't know anything
2. He doesn't even know that he doesn't know anything
He opens his mouth and his lips flap whatever he feels like flapping that second. There's no thought, no discretion, no circumspection, no rehearsal, no consideration, no self editing. He communicates both in lack of filter and in substance of speech at the level of a child.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, the issue is not whether or not Americans buy LL Bean, it's whether its ethical for the PEOTUS to be shilling for a donor. Maybe he can just start doing sponsored tweets so at least we're clear on who's paid for access.
Liberals are boycotting it because the supported Trump. Like I said, your hate of him is more than your concern for the American workers. Liberals love their iPhones and hate of Trump more than the hard working American
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, the issue is not whether or not Americans buy LL Bean, it's whether its ethical for the PEOTUS to be shilling for a donor. Maybe he can just start doing sponsored tweets so at least we're clear on who's paid for access.
Liberals are boycotting it because the supported Trump. Like I said, your hate of him is more than your concern for the American workers. Liberals love their iPhones and hate of Trump more than the hard working American
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, the issue is not whether or not Americans buy LL Bean, it's whether its ethical for the PEOTUS to be shilling for a donor. Maybe he can just start doing sponsored tweets so at least we're clear on who's paid for access.
Liberals are boycotting it because the supported Trump. Like I said, your hate of him is more than your concern for the American workers. Liberals love their iPhones and hate of Trump more than the hard working American
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So...PEOTUS just sent out a tweet thanking LL Bean for its "support" (big campaign donor) and telling people to bu LL Bean. I am no government ethics expert but promoting a specific company in exchange for their support has to be an issue.
I had a thread about this. Liberals are boycotting LL Bean. They produce clothes here in Maine. Liberals hate the American wormer
I guess Trump hates the American worker too since he hires foreigners at his FL resort and outsources all his clothing line to China and Bangladesh (he said they need jobs, too). And let's not forget how he hates unions and doesn't like minimum wage laws.
Nice deflection. He just brought thousands of jobs back plus brought million more with the other two deals.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, the issue is not whether or not Americans buy LL Bean, it's whether its ethical for the PEOTUS to be shilling for a donor. Maybe he can just start doing sponsored tweets so at least we're clear on who's paid for access.
At least he's open. Not like Obama and Goldman Sachs
Anonymous wrote:Again, the issue is not whether or not Americans buy LL Bean, it's whether its ethical for the PEOTUS to be shilling for a donor. Maybe he can just start doing sponsored tweets so at least we're clear on who's paid for access.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So...PEOTUS just sent out a tweet thanking LL Bean for its "support" (big campaign donor) and telling people to bu LL Bean. I am no government ethics expert but promoting a specific company in exchange for their support has to be an issue.
I had a thread about this. Liberals are boycotting LL Bean. They produce clothes here in Maine. Liberals hate the American wormer
I guess Trump hates the American worker too since he hires foreigners at his FL resort and outsources all his clothing line to China and Bangladesh (he said they need jobs, too). And let's not forget how he hates unions and doesn't like minimum wage laws.
Nice deflection. He just brought thousands of jobs back plus brought million more with the other two deals.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, the issue is not whether or not Americans buy LL Bean, it's whether its ethical for the PEOTUS to be shilling for a donor. Maybe he can just start doing sponsored tweets so at least we're clear on who's paid for access.
At least he's open. Not like Obama and Goldman Sachs
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Again, the issue is not whether or not Americans buy LL Bean, it's whether its ethical for the PEOTUS to be shilling for a donor. Maybe he can just start doing sponsored tweets so at least we're clear on who's paid for access.
At least he's open. Not like Obama and Goldman Sachs
Anonymous wrote:Again, the issue is not whether or not Americans buy LL Bean, it's whether its ethical for the PEOTUS to be shilling for a donor. Maybe he can just start doing sponsored tweets so at least we're clear on who's paid for access.