Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her look is that kind of look where she is interesting to look at more than traditionally beautiful- if that makes sense. A lot of high fashion models have it too. Beauty is subjective. There are times I look at Chrissy Teagan and think her features are down right weird and not pretty then times when she is stunning, I think its just one of those things.

I saw Chrissy Teagan in person once a few years ago at an event and she was gorgeous. Like "ethereal beauty, not from this planet" kind of looks.
The whole room just sort of stopped and stared.
In comparison she doesn't photograph well at all.

I could see that though. She seems like someone who is not photogenic, but has really gorgeous features when you isolate them. In contrast Gwyneth looks good in most photos, but when you really look at her features they are totally blah and kind of harsh.

I think thats the best way to tell who is truly beautiful and who is just photogenic- two totally different and unrelated things

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:what a depressing worldview. you were at a presumably lovely restaurant in a wonderful city and happen to glimpse a talented actress and your reaction is to shit on her looks.

+1

How dare OP. She probably also noticed the stench of urine and feces (both animal and human) in NYC instead of just appreciating that she's in a world-class city!

Oh please get off your high horse and your holier than thou attitude - you sound like a complete idiot ! She is America's most hated celebrity go tell it to the rest of America you big boring drip.

Anonymous wrote:what a depressing worldview. you were at a presumably lovely restaurant in a wonderful city and happen to glimpse a talented actress and your reaction is to shit on her looks.

+1

How dare OP. She probably also noticed the stench of urine and feces (both animal and human) in NYC instead of just appreciating that she's in a world-class city!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Her look is that kind of look where she is interesting to look at more than traditionally beautiful- if that makes sense. A lot of high fashion models have it too. Beauty is subjective. There are times I look at Chrissy Teagan and think her features are down right weird and not pretty then times when she is stunning, I think its just one of those things.

On the flip side, I think Giselle is so unreal stunning beautiful and my DH (who probably just wants TB all for himself, damn Pats fan) he thinks she looks like a bird.

I think Giselle's face looks masculine, not very pretty. Cut off the hair, take off the makeup, and she looks a guy.

Anonymous wrote:I fell asleep during shakespeare in love.

It was, indeed, a snooze-fest.

Anonymous wrote:Her look is that kind of look where she is interesting to look at more than traditionally beautiful- if that makes sense. A lot of high fashion models have it too. Beauty is subjective. There are times I look at Chrissy Teagan and think her features are down right weird and not pretty then times when she is stunning, I think its just one of those things.

I saw Chrissy Teagan in person once a few years ago at an event and she was gorgeous. Like "ethereal beauty, not from this planet" kind of looks.
The whole room just sort of stopped and stared.
In comparison she doesn't photograph well at all.

Agree with this. Why not "live and let live"? If you don't like her, don't buy her stuff or go to her movies, but otherwise MYOB

Anonymous wrote:what a depressing worldview. you were at a presumably lovely restaurant in a wonderful city and happen to glimpse a talented actress and your reaction is to shit on her looks.

Anonymous wrote:Her look is that kind of look where she is interesting to look at more than traditionally beautiful- if that makes sense. A lot of high fashion models have it too. Beauty is subjective. There are times I look at Chrissy Teagan and think her features are down right weird and not pretty then times when she is stunning, I think its just one of those things.

On the flip side, I think Giselle is so unreal stunning beautiful and my DH (who probably just wants TB all for himself, damn Pats fan) he thinks she looks like a bird.

Her look is that kind of look where she is interesting to look at more than traditionally beautiful- if that makes sense. A lot of high fashion models have it too. Beauty is subjective. There are times I look at Chrissy Teagan and think her features are down right weird and not pretty then times when she is stunning, I think its just one of those things.

Anonymous wrote:check this out...scary!

http://www.ranker.com/list/the-18-ugliest-photos-of-_usually-hot_-famous-chicks/greg

Wonders what false eyelashes/airbrushing/heavy make up does for one.

*** I had a hard time convincing my DH that Gwyneth Paltrow's hair in "Shakespeare" was fake! He was in love with those cascading tresses... ahh hollywood.

She is ugly but thin tall and connected- it's all about connections people unless you are crazily talented or ridiculously gorgeous and even then some fall between the cracks!