Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think is a wonderful idea for a name. It's a real enough name. I like it. But I like when parents give their child the name they want to call the child.
+1 Especially giving your child the name you will call them. So odd when people pick a nn they want to use then add another name as the legal first name that is never used. Just name your child the nn.
No its not strange to want to give the baby options when that child grows up!
Yes it is. It’s very strange to name your child one thing with the plan to call them something completely different from the start. NNs are things that evolve over time from your real name. They aren’t something that your parents plan out from the very start to call you all the while giving you another name.
If your child wants an option to be called something else then they can change their name. To give another name from the start as a fall back name means you know the nn you plan to use is dumb to begin with and not something a person would want to be called.
Anonymous wrote:It was a popular name in the era in which incompetence and confusion in girls and women was considered cute. I just met a Ditzy, same idea.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I like Dorothy -- it's strong and retro. If Alice is popular, why not Dorothy?
Dottie's cute enough as a NN but it's awfully lightweight for an adult.
My daughter is Dorothy and her buddy is Eleanore. I had one lady at a park rave over the name, said she knew the most beautiful person named Dorothy. I asked if she was 80 and she said yes. Don't care, totally owning the old lady name. She don't even call her Dottie or another nickname.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think is a wonderful idea for a name. It's a real enough name. I like it. But I like when parents give their child the name they want to call the child.
+1 Especially giving your child the name you will call them. So odd when people pick a nn they want to use then add another name as the legal first name that is never used. Just name your child the nn.
No its not strange to want to give the baby options when that child grows up!
Yes it is. It’s very strange to name your child one thing with the plan to call them something completely different from the start. NNs are things that evolve over time from your real name. They aren’t something that your parents plan out from the very start to call you all the while giving you another name.
If your child wants an option to be called something else then they can change their name. To give another name from the start as a fall back name means you know the nn you plan to use is dumb to begin with and not something a person would want to be called.
Anonymous wrote:I like Dorothy -- it's strong and retro. If Alice is popular, why not Dorothy?
Dottie's cute enough as a NN but it's awfully lightweight for an adult.
Anonymous wrote:It’s cute but the dotty / crazy / nut job association is also really diminishing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think is a wonderful idea for a name. It's a real enough name. I like it. But I like when parents give their child the name they want to call the child.
+1 Especially giving your child the name you will call them. So odd when people pick a nn they want to use then add another name as the legal first name that is never used. Just name your child the nn.
No its not strange to want to give the baby options when that child grows up!