Anonymous wrote:The owner was at fault for letting the dog run loose in a place where people can carry guns. The trigger happy yahoo doesn't win any points for shooting at the drop of a hat. The dog paid the ultimate price.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So it's ok to shoot the dog if the owner willingly let the dog off the leash vs. the dog slipping out?
That is not what people are saying. What people are saying here is that the owner intentionally left her untrained dog off the leash and is trying to play the victim after the dog went after someone aggressively and was shot. The owner is not a victim. This is entirely different than an owner who attempted to properly restrain the dog and the dog got out. The outcome may be the same, but in the first case, fault belongs to the owner and in the second case, it may not.
There were two crimes.
1. Dog off-leash
2. Animal cruelty/murder
Regardless if #1 happened or not, #2 happened and should be fully prosecuted. Either it's ok to shoot a playful dog in the park or it's not. Doesn't matter if the owner intentionally let it off the leash or if it was an accident.
Anonymous wrote:So it's ok to shoot the dog if the owner willingly let the dog off the leash vs. the dog slipping out?
That is not what people are saying. What people are saying here is that the owner intentionally left her untrained dog off the leash and is trying to play the victim after the dog went after someone aggressively and was shot. The owner is not a victim. This is entirely different than an owner who attempted to properly restrain the dog and the dog got out. The outcome may be the same, but in the first case, fault belongs to the owner and in the second case, it may not.
So it's ok to shoot the dog if the owner willingly let the dog off the leash vs. the dog slipping out?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WTF?!? Granted the dog shouldn't be off-leash, but if my dog accidentally slipped out of her harness in the park and some freakshow shot her I'd kill the guy. Without a second thought.
Dog was purposely left off leash and allowed to run far out of the sight line and control of the owner. A pack of two dogs was menacing the victims. The owners were too far away to intervene and the dogs were not responding to (far away) voice commands. The victim repeated called for the owner to help but the owner did not in any meaningful way. Dog was adult sized and not a "puppy" as claimed by theat fault owner. Owner was also at fault for purposefully deciding to allow her unresponsive and untrained dog to run free in a public park not meant for unleashed dogs.
VERY different from a dog slipping out of a harness your reach.
The owner is 100% at fault. The other person is a victim.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WTF?!? Granted the dog shouldn't be off-leash, but if my dog accidentally slipped out of her harness in the park and some freakshow shot her I'd kill the guy. Without a second thought.
Really? You would murder another human who killed your dog in self defense?
Who is the nut job here?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WTF?!? Granted the dog shouldn't be off-leash, but if my dog accidentally slipped out of her harness in the park and some freakshow shot her I'd kill the guy. Without a second thought.
Really? You would murder another human who killed your dog in self defense?
Who is the nut job here?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What's the problem, the criminal was shot dead
The 10 month lab puppy?
Few people would consider a full sized lab a "puppy" particularly if it was off leash, away from its owner and acting aggressively towards you.
Anonymous wrote:I feel bad for the dog. She died because her owner is an idiot. The owner should be fined. If you can't control your dog and let if jump on strangers, then you are too stupid to have a dog.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So if the owner of the dog had a gun and felt threatened by a man with a gun who shot her dog does she have a right to shoot him? Hes the one that pulled the gun in the first place right? That would make me feel threatened.
He was wrong, The dog should have been leashed yes, but the dog didnt bite anyone and wasnt even barking. People need to take the time to learn about animal behavior. A jumping dog doesnt mean its aggressive.
Investigators disagree with you. They found the dog to be aggressive and the shooting justified.
How do they determine a dead dog aggressive? Its dead!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So if the owner of the dog had a gun and felt threatened by a man with a gun who shot her dog does she have a right to shoot him? Hes the one that pulled the gun in the first place right? That would make me feel threatened.
He was wrong, The dog should have been leashed yes, but the dog didnt bite anyone and wasnt even barking. People need to take the time to learn about animal behavior. A jumping dog doesnt mean its aggressive.
Investigators disagree with you. They found the dog to be aggressive and the shooting justified.
Anonymous wrote:So if the owner of the dog had a gun and felt threatened by a man with a gun who shot her dog does she have a right to shoot him? Hes the one that pulled the gun in the first place right? That would make me feel threatened.
He was wrong, The dog should have been leashed yes, but the dog didnt bite anyone and wasnt even barking. People need to take the time to learn about animal behavior. A jumping dog doesnt mean its aggressive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:WTF?!? Granted the dog shouldn't be off-leash, but if my dog accidentally slipped out of her harness in the park and some freakshow shot her I'd kill the guy. Without a second thought.
Really? You would murder another human who killed your dog in self defense?
Who is the nut job here?