She looks like a tacky NoVa mom who drives a red or white convertible Audi and dresses like she's 20. Like the 'cool mom' from Mean Girls:

Anonymous wrote:I don't care if she looks like hell. I have no sympathy for her. She chose to work for the devil knowing full well what he was. I hope her political career is over and I hope every rational Reublican shuns her. She (and everyone else who worked for him or endorses him or was a silent bystander) wrecked the Republican party and has done serious damage to our democracy.

There are a lot of asses in both parties but she desrves her own special circle of hell for her complicity in this nightmare.

Hear, hear!

Anonymous wrote:Hillary was under court order to take that case. The "laughing" years later was being incredulous about the lie detector test, not at the victim, but sure, compare that situation to Conway cashing in for what has to be one of the worst candidates ever.

I hope she is cashing her checks before 11/8.

You can be sure Hillary cashes in her checks the second they get in her greedy, slimy hands in case she can't pull off the deal.

Hillary was under court order to take that case. The "laughing" years later was being incredulous about the lie detector test, not at the victim, but sure, compare that situation to Conway cashing in for what has to be one of the worst candidates ever.

I hope she is cashing her checks before 11/8.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't care if she looks like hell. I have no sympathy for her. She chose to work for the devil knowing full well what he was. I hope her political career is over and I hope every rational Reublican shuns her. She (and everyone else who worked for him or endorses him or was a silent bystander) wrecked the Republican party and has done serious damage to our democracy.

There are a lot of asses in both parties but she desrves her own special circle of hell for her complicity in this nightmare.

It sounds like you've described a similar situation to when Hillary Clinton defended a child rapist back in the 1970's. People take jobs, sometimes willingly, sometimes they feel they can't say no because it's their job - but maybe they could've tried to get out of it, hard to know. I've spoken to a few lawyers who say they would find another job if they had been put in that situation, that is after doing everything possible to get taken off the case. Many people think it was reprehensible and can't fathom how, as a woman, she could persecute 12 year old girl and get the rapist off the hook, but she had a job to do. Do you similarly feel that Hillary should have been shunned and that her career should've been over for doing that job?

Are you nuts to compare these situations? Conway took the job banking on the glory that would follow if Trump gets elected.

I think this is pretty faulty reasoning on Conway's part. Can you imagine having to defend a President Trump?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't care if she looks like hell. I have no sympathy for her. She chose to work for the devil knowing full well what he was. I hope her political career is over and I hope every rational Reublican shuns her. She (and everyone else who worked for him or endorses him or was a silent bystander) wrecked the Republican party and has done serious damage to our democracy.

There are a lot of asses in both parties but she desrves her own special circle of hell for her complicity in this nightmare.

It sounds like you've described a similar situation to when Hillary Clinton defended a child rapist back in the 1970's. People take jobs, sometimes willingly, sometimes they feel they can't say no because it's their job - but maybe they could've tried to get out of it, hard to know. I've spoken to a few lawyers who say they would find another job if they had been put in that situation, that is after doing everything possible to get taken off the case. Many people think it was reprehensible and can't fathom how, as a woman, she could persecute 12 year old girl and get the rapist off the hook, but she had a job to do. Do you similarly feel that Hillary should have been shunned and that her career should've been over for doing that job?

Your lawyer friends would not leave the profession over this. Find the ones who actually did, not the ones who said they "woulda"

Saying they would find another job does not imply to me that they would find a new profession.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't care if she looks like hell. I have no sympathy for her. She chose to work for the devil knowing full well what he was. I hope her political career is over and I hope every rational Reublican shuns her. She (and everyone else who worked for him or endorses him or was a silent bystander) wrecked the Republican party and has done serious damage to our democracy.

There are a lot of asses in both parties but she desrves her own special circle of hell for her complicity in this nightmare.

It sounds like you've described a similar situation to when Hillary Clinton defended a child rapist back in the 1970's. People take jobs, sometimes willingly, sometimes they feel they can't say no because it's their job - but maybe they could've tried to get out of it, hard to know. I've spoken to a few lawyers who say they would find another job if they had been put in that situation, that is after doing everything possible to get taken off the case. Many people think it was reprehensible and can't fathom how, as a woman, she could persecute 12 year old girl and get the rapist off the hook, but she had a job to do. Do you similarly feel that Hillary should have been shunned and that her career should've been over for doing that job?

l

Ironically, it sounds like *you* don't accept that argument. So I'm curious-- do you think Conway and Clinton are/were just doing their jobs or that they are both immoral people who shouldn't be trusted or respected for their professional duties?

Nice way to answer my question without providing an answer. Your girl would be proud.

Your posing that question to me won't elicit the answer you want because I would have to be in agreement with you that Kellyanne Conway is the devil or that she is representing the devil. I don't care for several things about him and freely admit he is FAR from being a candidate I would've chosen, but if I felt about him the way that you do, that he is the devil, I wouldn't vote for him. That being said, I hope we can both agree that the man who raped and tortured a 12 year old girl is the devil. And if you do, then that puts them both in the same category in your opinion. So, again, should Hillary have suffered the same fate you wish on Kellyanne Conway?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't care if she looks like hell. I have no sympathy for her. She chose to work for the devil knowing full well what he was. I hope her political career is over and I hope every rational Reublican shuns her. She (and everyone else who worked for him or endorses him or was a silent bystander) wrecked the Republican party and has done serious damage to our democracy.

There are a lot of asses in both parties but she desrves her own special circle of hell for her complicity in this nightmare.

It sounds like you've described a similar situation to when Hillary Clinton defended a child rapist back in the 1970's. People take jobs, sometimes willingly, sometimes they feel they can't say no because it's their job - but maybe they could've tried to get out of it, hard to know. I've spoken to a few lawyers who say they would find another job if they had been put in that situation, that is after doing everything possible to get taken off the case. Many people think it was reprehensible and can't fathom how, as a woman, she could persecute 12 year old girl and get the rapist off the hook, but she had a job to do. Do you similarly feel that Hillary should have been shunned and that her career should've been over for doing that job?

Are you nuts to compare these situations? Conway took the job banking on the glory that would follow if Trump gets elected.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't care if she looks like hell. I have no sympathy for her. She chose to work for the devil knowing full well what he was. I hope her political career is over and I hope every rational Reublican shuns her. She (and everyone else who worked for him or endorses him or was a silent bystander) wrecked the Republican party and has done serious damage to our democracy.

There are a lot of asses in both parties but she desrves her own special circle of hell for her complicity in this nightmare.

It sounds like you've described a similar situation to when Hillary Clinton defended a child rapist back in the 1970's. People take jobs, sometimes willingly, sometimes they feel they can't say no because it's their job - but maybe they could've tried to get out of it, hard to know. I've spoken to a few lawyers who say they would find another job if they had been put in that situation, that is after doing everything possible to get taken off the case. Many people think it was reprehensible and can't fathom how, as a woman, she could persecute 12 year old girl and get the rapist off the hook, but she had a job to do. Do you similarly feel that Hillary should have been shunned and that her career should've been over for doing that job?

Your lawyer friends would not leave the profession over this. Find the ones who actually did, not the ones who said they "woulda"

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't care if she looks like hell. I have no sympathy for her. She chose to work for the devil knowing full well what he was. I hope her political career is over and I hope every rational Reublican shuns her. She (and everyone else who worked for him or endorses him or was a silent bystander) wrecked the Republican party and has done serious damage to our democracy.

There are a lot of asses in both parties but she desrves her own special circle of hell for her complicity in this nightmare.

It sounds like you've described a similar situation to when Hillary Clinton defended a child rapist back in the 1970's. People take jobs, sometimes willingly, sometimes they feel they can't say no because it's their job - but maybe they could've tried to get out of it, hard to know. I've spoken to a few lawyers who say they would find another job if they had been put in that situation, that is after doing everything possible to get taken off the case. Many people think it was reprehensible and can't fathom how, as a woman, she could persecute 12 year old girl and get the rapist off the hook, but she had a job to do. Do you similarly feel that Hillary should have been shunned and that her career should've been over for doing that job?

Lol, no, these two situations are nothing alike. Keep trying though.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I don't care if she looks like hell. I have no sympathy for her. She chose to work for the devil knowing full well what he was. I hope her political career is over and I hope every rational Reublican shuns her. She (and everyone else who worked for him or endorses him or was a silent bystander) wrecked the Republican party and has done serious damage to our democracy.

There are a lot of asses in both parties but she desrves her own special circle of hell for her complicity in this nightmare.

It sounds like you've described a similar situation to when Hillary Clinton defended a child rapist back in the 1970's. People take jobs, sometimes willingly, sometimes they feel they can't say no because it's their job - but maybe they could've tried to get out of it, hard to know. I've spoken to a few lawyers who say they would find another job if they had been put in that situation, that is after doing everything possible to get taken off the case. Many people think it was reprehensible and can't fathom how, as a woman, she could persecute 12 year old girl and get the rapist off the hook, but she had a job to do. Do you similarly feel that Hillary should have been shunned and that her career should've been over for doing that job?

l

Ironically, it sounds like *you* don't accept that argument. So I'm curious-- do you think Conway and Clinton are/were just doing their jobs or that they are both immoral people who shouldn't be trusted or respected for their professional duties?

Anonymous wrote:I don't care if she looks like hell. I have no sympathy for her. She chose to work for the devil knowing full well what he was. I hope her political career is over and I hope every rational Reublican shuns her. She (and everyone else who worked for him or endorses him or was a silent bystander) wrecked the Republican party and has done serious damage to our democracy.

There are a lot of asses in both parties but she desrves her own special circle of hell for her complicity in this nightmare.

She sold her soul to the devil, and that's where she's going. Can't wait to see her the morning after the election.

Anonymous wrote:I don't care if she looks like hell. I have no sympathy for her. She chose to work for the devil knowing full well what he was. I hope her political career is over and I hope every rational Reublican shuns her. She (and everyone else who worked for him or endorses him or was a silent bystander) wrecked the Republican party and has done serious damage to our democracy.

There are a lot of asses in both parties but she desrves her own special circle of hell for her complicity in this nightmare.

It sounds like you've described a similar situation to when Hillary Clinton defended a child rapist back in the 1970's. People take jobs, sometimes willingly, sometimes they feel they can't say no because it's their job - but maybe they could've tried to get out of it, hard to know. I've spoken to a few lawyers who say they would find another job if they had been put in that situation, that is after doing everything possible to get taken off the case. Many people think it was reprehensible and can't fathom how, as a woman, she could persecute 12 year old girl and get the rapist off the hook, but she had a job to do. Do you similarly feel that Hillary should have been shunned and that her career should've been over for doing that job?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She's an example of an excellent Trump hire. Since hiring/appointing is a big part of what presidents do, it is a mark in Trump's favor.

She is the ONLY example of a good Trump hire. Nearly everyone else has been disastrous.

Hmmm let's see.

Corey got him the Republican primary victory.

Manafort got the convention under control and secured the delegates.

Mike Pence wiped the floor with Tim Kaine.

His hires didn't say their candidate has bad instincts and doesn't know what planet she is living (Podesta, Abdin).

Oh, I'm sure ALL of Trump's people have said much, much worse things about Trump. It's just that the Russians haven't leaked them.

After the election, though, just wait for the stories.

Seriously, don't you think Conway's real, behind the scenes take on Trump is fairly negative? She keeps saying that they have plenty of ammunition to attack Hillary with, and that it's amazing that people dislike Hillary so much that H can't get her numbers up above 43%, and that she has tried to counsel Trump to stay on message, but Trump keeps going off. Don't you think that on the inside she has some extremely negative thoughts about his lack of discipline and some of the sexist/racist stuff he has said that has caused so many voters to dislike him? I'm sure many people in his campaign have some extremely negative stuff to say.

I don't care if she looks like hell. I have no sympathy for her. She chose to work for the devil knowing full well what he was. I hope her political career is over and I hope every rational Reublican shuns her. She (and everyone else who worked for him or endorses him or was a silent bystander) wrecked the Republican party and has done serious damage to our democracy.

There are a lot of asses in both parties but she desrves her own special circle of hell for her complicity in this nightmare.