Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ehh. Never understood the fascination with her. She's extremely average.
She's 5-9 and probably weights, what, 120 lbs? If that.
Whatever you want to say about her, she's most certainly not average.
I don't think Harper's Bazaar features many truly average women who are 5-4 and 150 lbs sitting on conveyor belt in their underwear. Now that would be a very different looking photo shoot.
NP, and I think GP is pretty though I'm not really a fan. I think what that poster meant is, if you saw GP walking around the grocery store in real life, you wouldn't bat an eye. And I guarantee they can make an a 5-4 150 pound woman look hot as hell if they used the same lightening and enhancement treatments they did in this shoot.
A tall, slim, pretty blond woman? I might notice her in a sea of dumpy DC types. Just keeping it real.
You might not like her, but she doesn't look like most people and she's better looking than most people by stereotypical Western standards. I just think it's silly to pretend otherwise. Again, call her a pretentious douche all you want. I agree.
Maybe compared to you she is Ms. Universe (just keepin it real). Below average looking people think average looking people are "gorg". Just keeping it real. But she is SO basic looking, which is fine. She may be on the cover of HB for being an A list actress, but Gwyneth is not known for her beauty.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ehh. Never understood the fascination with her. She's extremely average.
She's 5-9 and probably weights, what, 120 lbs? If that.
Whatever you want to say about her, she's most certainly not average.
I don't think Harper's Bazaar features many truly average women who are 5-4 and 150 lbs sitting on conveyor belt in their underwear. Now that would be a very different looking photo shoot.
Did you know that tall and skinny people can be average too? She's average. Extremely, extremely ordinary. I can walk down Wisconsin Avenue right now and pick out 5 women in 10 minutes who would smoke her without the photoshop and money.
Anonymous wrote: Observations are that she has never been known to be a beauty, in fact I think the only reason she has stayed relevant is because of her elitist remarks which really get under people skin. She is tall and then the beautiful she is not, her face looks old and she's really quite ordinary.
Anonymous wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3832773/Gwyneth-Paltrow-sizzles-grocery-store-swimwear-heels-Harper-s-Bazaar.html
She looks amazing even though the shoot is goofy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ehh. Never understood the fascination with her. She's extremely average.
She's 5-9 and probably weights, what, 120 lbs? If that.
Whatever you want to say about her, she's most certainly not average.
I don't think Harper's Bazaar features many truly average women who are 5-4 and 150 lbs sitting on conveyor belt in their underwear. Now that would be a very different looking photo shoot.
NP, and I think GP is pretty though I'm not really a fan. I think what that poster meant is, if you saw GP walking around the grocery store in real life, you wouldn't bat an eye. And I guarantee they can make an a 5-4 150 pound woman look hot as hell if they used the same lightening and enhancement treatments they did in this shoot.
A tall, slim, pretty blond woman? I might notice her in a sea of dumpy DC types. Just keeping it real.
You might not like her, but she doesn't look like most people and she's better looking than most people by stereotypical Western standards. I just think it's silly to pretend otherwise. Again, call her a pretentious douche all you want. I agree.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ehh. Never understood the fascination with her. She's extremely average.
She's 5-9 and probably weights, what, 120 lbs? If that.
Whatever you want to say about her, she's most certainly not average.
I don't think Harper's Bazaar features many truly average women who are 5-4 and 150 lbs sitting on conveyor belt in their underwear. Now that would be a very different looking photo shoot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ehh. Never understood the fascination with her. She's extremely average.
She's 5-9 and probably weights, what, 120 lbs? If that.
Whatever you want to say about her, she's most certainly not average.
I don't think Harper's Bazaar features many truly average women who are 5-4 and 150 lbs sitting on conveyor belt in their underwear. Now that would be a very different looking photo shoot.
NP, and I think GP is pretty though I'm not really a fan. I think what that poster meant is, if you saw GP walking around the grocery store in real life, you wouldn't bat an eye. And I guarantee they can make an a 5-4 150 pound woman look hot as hell if they used the same lightening and enhancement treatments they did in this shoot.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:![]()
She is so pretty!
I think she's a very nice looking person but not anything amazing.
Replace that exact picture with brown hair and brown eyes and she would look like any average woman that you wouldn't look twice at.
It's the blond hair dye and blue eyes that seem to get most people from regular to pretty.
Her skin is actually weathered. You can even see it a bit in the photo--but friends that have met her up close say lots of make-up and not good.
Thank god for my 1/4 Sicilian--I can be blue-eyed without the weathered skin in my 40s. Olive skin! hooray!