Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow OP made this sound controversial but that isn't the case...

Trump was hitting it in his "speech" last night. So it's a talking point they're trying.

Well, she is either mocking the people who supported Bernie, or she is admitting that our economy sucks, yet she has run on a platform to basically continue the policies that have been in place for the past 8 years (because Obama has done such great work, according to HRC).
Pick one.

Both Obama and Clinton say all the time that while the economy has recovered significantly from the financial crash that Obama inherited, more still needs to be done and some groups still face challenges.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wow OP made this sound controversial but that isn't the case...

Trump was hitting it in his "speech" last night. So it's a talking point they're trying.

Well, she is either mocking the people who supported Bernie, or she is admitting that our economy sucks, yet she has run on a platform to basically continue the policies that have been in place for the past 8 years (because Obama has done such great work, according to HRC).
Pick one.

Anonymous wrote:Wow OP made this sound controversial but that isn't the case...

Trump was hitting it in his "speech" last night. So it's a talking point they're trying.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'll take my chances voting my conscience. Hillary's commitment to foreign wars scares me enough and her backers' mantra that she "gets shit done" means nothing because it, historically, has been awful, awful shit.

So let's see, if you *knew* you were going to be forced to eat:

a) shit
b) vomit

And none of the above is NOT available to you, would you chose one of the two or let someone else decide for you?

Because, that is what is happening. I would choose vomit, as it is likely to contain fewer germs. But that's me.

Congrats on crafting the most repellant analogy I have ever read.

Anonymous wrote:I'll take my chances voting my conscience. Hillary's commitment to foreign wars scares me enough and her backers' mantra that she "gets shit done" means nothing because it, historically, has been awful, awful shit.

So let's see, if you *knew* you were going to be forced to eat:

a) shit
b) vomit

And none of the above is NOT available to you, would you chose one of the two or let someone else decide for you?

Because, that is what is happening. I would choose vomit, as it is likely to contain fewer germs. But that's me.

I also don't have a problem with what she said. It is true and actually sympathetic. She was recognizing how disappointed they are in their current situation.

Anonymous wrote:I am not a Hilary fan but I think she sort of nailed it. Not what she said about Trump supporters, but yes what she said about Bernie supporters.

Yes, as a Bernie supporter whose kid is a millenial and a Bernie supporter, I think she was being quite sympathetic. To be honest, I would have like to have seen more of that coming from the Clinton campaign at times. (You don't know how annoying it is to be accused of being a "Bernie bro" when you're a 60-year-old woman.) I have no problem with what Hillary said.