Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds like they gave him every opportunity to fix it without it becoming a big deal, and the student wanted to escalate it. Now he gets to be a victim of institutional racism, which I'm sure will get him on TV and so on.
Or, on the flip side, he did nothing wrong, felt like he did nothing wrong, and was blamed for something and offered an opportunity to cop a plea when he was actually innocent? So now he is trying to make a stand to show the biases of the system?
I agree with this. He didn't do anything wrong. They need to throw this case out- over a .65 cent milk. The prosecutors should be ashamed.
Stealing not wrong in certain culture?
but how much experience do you have navigating stores, cashiers, buying things? It's a kid going to the same cafeteria with the sane people every day, not even using actual dollars. He probably had no idea they would think he was stealing because he wasn't and assumed what he was doing was obvious. Because he's a kid with little experience and maturity.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Excuse me.
He had the right to a free carton of milk, he went to take it rapidly without waiting in line because otherwise he wouldn't have time to eat, which makes perfect sense, and people are mad about this?
He still needs to check out with the cashier like everyone else, just like he does for his lunch. Not everyone in that line gets free meals, so he needs to have this processed by the cashier, even if he won't have to pay anything.
Just like if you have a get 1 free coupon at the grocery store. You still need to hand it to the cashier, not just grab an item and walk out the door.
But if you are in a cafeteria style restaurant and you pay for a meal that includes a cookie, and you forget to get your cookie, do you have to go to the end of the line? And have the cashier check you out, again? i don't think so. I wouldn't.
I'd at least mention it to the cashier... how would they know I'm not stealing?
Anonymous wrote:It's a sixty five cent carton of milk that the school did not pay for. That milk is paid for by the USDA, a federal agency. So they are going to spend thousands of dollars to prosecute a .65 product. Idiots. Oh, it's Virginia.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Excuse me.
He had the right to a free carton of milk, he went to take it rapidly without waiting in line because otherwise he wouldn't have time to eat, which makes perfect sense, and people are mad about this?
He still needs to check out with the cashier like everyone else, just like he does for his lunch. Not everyone in that line gets free meals, so he needs to have this processed by the cashier, even if he won't have to pay anything.
Just like if you have a get 1 free coupon at the grocery store. You still need to hand it to the cashier, not just grab an item and walk out the door.
But if you are in a cafeteria style restaurant and you pay for a meal that includes a cookie, and you forget to get your cookie, do you have to go to the end of the line? And have the cashier check you out, again? i don't think so. I wouldn't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Excuse me.
He had the right to a free carton of milk, he went to take it rapidly without waiting in line because otherwise he wouldn't have time to eat, which makes perfect sense, and people are mad about this?
He still needs to check out with the cashier like everyone else, just like he does for his lunch. Not everyone in that line gets free meals, so he needs to have this processed by the cashier, even if he won't have to pay anything.
Just like if you have a get 1 free coupon at the grocery store. You still need to hand it to the cashier, not just grab an item and walk out the door.
But if you are in a cafeteria style restaurant and you pay for a meal that includes a cookie, and you forget to get your cookie, do you have to go to the end of the line? And have the cashier check you out, again? i don't think so. I wouldn't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Excuse me.
He had the right to a free carton of milk, he went to take it rapidly without waiting in line because otherwise he wouldn't have time to eat, which makes perfect sense, and people are mad about this?
He still needs to check out with the cashier like everyone else, just like he does for his lunch. Not everyone in that line gets free meals, so he needs to have this processed by the cashier, even if he won't have to pay anything.
Just like if you have a get 1 free coupon at the grocery store. You still need to hand it to the cashier, not just grab an item and walk out the door.
Anonymous wrote:
Excuse me.
He had the right to a free carton of milk, he went to take it rapidly without waiting in line because otherwise he wouldn't have time to eat, which makes perfect sense, and people are mad about this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds like they gave him every opportunity to fix it without it becoming a big deal, and the student wanted to escalate it. Now he gets to be a victim of institutional racism, which I'm sure will get him on TV and so on.
Or, on the flip side, he did nothing wrong, felt like he did nothing wrong, and was blamed for something and offered an opportunity to cop a plea when he was actually innocent? So now he is trying to make a stand to show the biases of the system?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Frickin ridiculous
My father was an assistant principal. He faced down kids with knives and nunchucks. And I don't believe law enforcement was ever involved.
Seriously? Going to court over a milk? I just can't
The kid was offered the option not to go to court. He chose not to take that option.
He was offered a punishment. I wouldn't accept a punishment if I didn't do anything wrong. Good for this kid to have a backbone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Um, did y'all just completely miss this part?
When Ryan didn’t cooperate with a trip to see the principal, authorities say, he was arrested and charged with disorderly conduct and petit larceny
Sounds like he cut in line (not ok under any circumstance) and grabbed the milk. He was asked about it and then refused to cooperate. I doubt he was calm, polite, and respectful. It is more likely that he was simply told not to cut in line and asked if he had already received his FREE milk and he acted like an ass. Then he refused to go to the principals office. The police were called because he was probably shouting obscenities and refusing to do what the school staff asked.
I see no problem at all with this.
Good thing you have all the facts!
Good thing you have all the facts!
Anonymous wrote:Um, did y'all just completely miss this part?
When Ryan didn’t cooperate with a trip to see the principal, authorities say, he was arrested and charged with disorderly conduct and petit larceny
Sounds like he cut in line (not ok under any circumstance) and grabbed the milk. He was asked about it and then refused to cooperate. I doubt he was calm, polite, and respectful. It is more likely that he was simply told not to cut in line and asked if he had already received his FREE milk and he acted like an ass. Then he refused to go to the principals office. The police were called because he was probably shouting obscenities and refusing to do what the school staff asked.
I see no problem at all with this.
Good thing you have all the facts!
Anonymous wrote:
Excuse me.
He had the right to a free carton of milk, he went to take it rapidly without waiting in line because otherwise he wouldn't have time to eat, which makes perfect sense, and people are mad about this?
His cooperation or non-cooperation afterward has no bearing on the fact that he did nothing wrong. The school was probably trying to pin him down for something because he's a problem kid, BUT - he did nothing wrong this time.
In what crazy world are we living in?
The kid should be compensated by the school.