Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd like to know what medications she has taken in the last two years. atypical antipsychotics can induce Parkinson like symptoms.
Both this letter and the one from 2015 tell you what medication she takes.
Anonymous wrote:Nothing to worry about.
Dr. Bill Clinton says Hillary has the flu![]()
Anonymous wrote:I'd like to know what medications she has taken in the last two years. atypical antipsychotics can induce Parkinson like symptoms.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not one single board certified specialty physician will put his/her name out there saying that Hillary even APPEARS to be healthy. They'd get laughed out of the physicians' lounge, just like Dr. Drew reported.
No reputable physician would publicly opine about whether someone APPEARS healthy, whatever the f*ck that is supposed to mean. Physicians examine
Patients and review test results. As for Dr. Drew, next time you have a medical issue why don't you try Skyping him and get his diagnosis. That seems to be along the lines of his specialty. Then again, he's probably too busy sucking up to the rightwing media because he's thrown away all professional credibility and needs to figure out how to stay in the media spotlight he so desperately craves.
Anonymous wrote:Not one single board certified specialty physician will put his/her name out there saying that Hillary even APPEARS to be healthy. They'd get laughed out of the physicians' lounge, just like Dr. Drew reported.
Anonymous wrote:Let's see fat ass Trump's medical records. Nothing from him. A chat with Dr Oz doesn't count.
Anonymous wrote:Not one single board certified specialty physician will put his/her name out there saying that Hillary even APPEARS to be healthy. They'd get laughed out of the physicians' lounge, just like Dr. Drew reported.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You obviously don't have a clue about actuarial science. Just because her pulse and bp is good, and a ct of her heart and brain is normal, there are a 100 other things that can affect a persons health and mortality.Anonymous wrote:Hilary's vitals are really good. And they did a ct scan of her heart and her brain, both normal. Based on this she would be low risk from an actuarial basis.
You mean the actuarial science that greatly favors a 68-year-old woman whose mother died at 92, over a 70-year-old man whose father died in his early 70s from Alzheimer's which she was diagnosed with in his late 60s?
No, the fact that isolating someones health to one or two areas, which is that the pp did, is not enough. Family history is nice but it only plays a more significant part if there is a history of major illness and death in close family members at a young age. No one that knows anything about this would make such a statement as above. There is a reason there are a lot of questions asked about a persons health and lifestyle to determine what group they might fit in. In Hillary's case we already have a history of blood clots. Did her mother have that same history?
BTW, she is taking the coumadin for DVT and we know that is an effective treatment yet it recurred even so. But, DVT is a life threatening illness and can strike at any time and there are additional risk factors in taking blood thinners.
So, this isn't an assessment of her overall health, just rebutting the silly notion that a ct of someone's heart and brain, along with good blood pressure and heart rate, makes her a low risk from an actuarial standpoint.
I can't speak to actuarial science, but I can say that the brain CT rules out Parkinson's and stroke.
Brain damage is not ruled out.
And you are a... neurologist?
Again, brain damage is not ruled out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You obviously don't have a clue about actuarial science. Just because her pulse and bp is good, and a ct of her heart and brain is normal, there are a 100 other things that can affect a persons health and mortality.Anonymous wrote:Hilary's vitals are really good. And they did a ct scan of her heart and her brain, both normal. Based on this she would be low risk from an actuarial basis.
You mean the actuarial science that greatly favors a 68-year-old woman whose mother died at 92, over a 70-year-old man whose father died in his early 70s from Alzheimer's which she was diagnosed with in his late 60s?
No, the fact that isolating someones health to one or two areas, which is that the pp did, is not enough. Family history is nice but it only plays a more significant part if there is a history of major illness and death in close family members at a young age. No one that knows anything about this would make such a statement as above. There is a reason there are a lot of questions asked about a persons health and lifestyle to determine what group they might fit in. In Hillary's case we already have a history of blood clots. Did her mother have that same history?
BTW, she is taking the coumadin for DVT and we know that is an effective treatment yet it recurred even so. But, DVT is a life threatening illness and can strike at any time and there are additional risk factors in taking blood thinners.
So, this isn't an assessment of her overall health, just rebutting the silly notion that a ct of someone's heart and brain, along with good blood pressure and heart rate, makes her a low risk from an actuarial standpoint.
I can't speak to actuarial science, but I can say that the brain CT rules out Parkinson's and stroke.
Brain damage is not ruled out.
And you are a... neurologist?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hilary's vitals are really good. And they did a ct scan of her heart and her brain, both normal. Based on this she would be low risk from an actuarial basis.
You obviously don't have a clue about actuarial science. Just because her pulse and bp is good, and a ct of her heart and brain is normal, there are a 100 other things that can affect a persons health and mortality.
You can't find anything wrongs. So you're just gong to make shit up, huh?
This is like the birther bullshit over Obama's "long form" birth certificate all over again. You just weave conspiracy theories because you have nothing but dick in your hand. Deplorable.
Make shit up? Exactly what was put forth that was made up?