Anonymous wrote:The shark has been jumped by CTR.

Trump doesn't need an earpiece. The man speaks his mind and doesn't need to do opinion polling and discuss his "positions" with a bunch of handlers before he says anything.

Anonymous wrote:we need some deep forensic analysis on what is going on in that picture

Anonymous wrote:The shark has been jumped by CTR.

Trump doesn't need an earpiece. The man speaks his mind and doesn't need to do opinion polling and discuss his "positions" with a bunch of handlers before he says anything.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And for clarity, an earpiece for a "feed" IS illicit in the context we are speaking of.

SHE IS NOT BEING "FED" ANY RESPONSES! My God. You people swing from calling her a brilliant, cunning mastermind who is controlling the entire press and government to calling her a brain-dead zombie on life support who is parroting responses fed to her by mysterious hidden puppetmasters. You don't care one whit about whether anything is true, just as long as you can keep hurling accusations and smears.

What is wrong with you? I never said she had an illicit earpiece. I was just making a distinction between a hearing aid and an earpiece that CAN be used for illicit purposes. All of a sudden we're calling her a brain-dead zombie now? You liberals need to calm down and stop attacking reasonable people or you will drive away the independents who haven't made up their minds. And stop calling everyone a liar - except for your precious Hillary, of course. It's amazing how you can't discern between someone telling the truth and someone lying.

You are full of crap and don't like being called on it. Talk about dishonest. An earpiece "could" be used for "illicit" purposes, and you just happen to throw that out in a thread about.... Hillary Clinton maybe having an earpiece during the presidential forum.

Just like Trump with his "people are saying, I don't know, I've heard, they should maybe check out" whisper campaigns.

I'm not going to respond any longer. You are simply another disrespectful liberal who accuses everyone but Hillary of being a liar. Have a lovely day.

Anonymous wrote:Can we talk about Trump's hairpiece?

Anonymous wrote:The shark has been jumped by CTR.

Trump doesn't need an earpiece. The man speaks his mind and doesn't need to do opinion polling and discuss his "positions" with a bunch of handlers before he says anything.

Anonymous wrote:The shark has been jumped by CTR.

Trump doesn't need an earpiece. The man speaks his mind and doesn't need to do opinion polling and discuss his "positions" with a bunch of handlers before he says anything.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Which one is it? If hearing aid then she should be fine admitting it and we go about our business otherwise the idea that this was an earpiece and she was being coached is downright scary!!!

http://www.infowars.com/was-hillary-wearing-an-earpiece-during-last-nights-presidential-forum/

The way she wears her hair makes it easy to hide. I agree she needs to come clean if she's wearing a hearing aide.

Why does she need to "come clean" about wearing hearing aids, assuming that's even what it is? Is there something shameful about that? I'd like to know, because I wear two and I am unashamed.

I didn't mean it in a negative way. To the contrary. If she wears a hearing aid, she should say so to put a stop to the rumors of an illicit earpiece during interviews.
Also, a hearing aid would not in any way raise questions about president's fitness for service. There are other things, though, that would - such as a concussion causing memory lapses, which HRC herself has admitted. Now THAT is a cause for concern.

Yes, you did. You erected a straw man. Hearing aid or TV earpiece -- neither of those things are "illicit." Shame on you. Jesus.

I said I didn't, and referred to an earpiece to "feed" info as the illicit device. Stop telling me what I meant. I suppose you are a mind reader now. Shame on YOU!