Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They have done a bunch of studies and found that while the metric system is overall an easier system to use, people (even those who live metric) find that the English system works better in two instances. Weather/temperature and personal weight. In those cases, people found that they could describe their experience much better using the English system. For example, it is easier to describe a comfort zone as "the 70s" as opposed to "anywhere from 20 to 24.3".
I guess that's why the UK still uses both . . .
Add cooking to this list.
The US system is better for temperature, body measuring (height AND weight) and cooking.
Daily life stuff.
Baking is easier in metric. A cup of flour is always inaccurate. Cooks agree that it is better to measure it in grams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They have done a bunch of studies and found that while the metric system is overall an easier system to use, people (even those who live metric) find that the English system works better in two instances. Weather/temperature and personal weight. In those cases, people found that they could describe their experience much better using the English system. For example, it is easier to describe a comfort zone as "the 70s" as opposed to "anywhere from 20 to 24.3".
I guess that's why the UK still uses both . . .
Add cooking to this list.
The US system is better for temperature, body measuring (height AND weight) and cooking.
Daily life stuff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They have done a bunch of studies and found that while the metric system is overall an easier system to use, people (even those who live metric) find that the English system works better in two instances. Weather/temperature and personal weight. In those cases, people found that they could describe their experience much better using the English system. For example, it is easier to describe a comfort zone as "the 70s" as opposed to "anywhere from 20 to 24.3".
I guess that's why the UK still uses both . . .
Add cooking to this list.
The US system is better for temperature, body measuring (height AND weight) and cooking.
Daily life stuff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
One thing I still can't get over after 15 years in the U.S. is Farenheit. Not getting it. Have to convert to Celsius if I want to know what to wear.
Fahrenheit is one of the strenghts of the imperial system over metric.
0F=damn cold, 100F = damn hot
Then ever ten degrees makes it easy to figure out the weather.
30's = winter jacket + gloves
40s' = winter jacket
50's = light jacket
60= lighter jacket
70= t-shirt
etc
Basically every ten tells you a different wardrobe change. Not like 22 vs 25c.
It's all relative. In the Middle East (Gulf countries), people wear parkas and mufflers when it's 60* out.
You wear a jacket when it's 60 degrees out?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
One thing I still can't get over after 15 years in the U.S. is Farenheit. Not getting it. Have to convert to Celsius if I want to know what to wear.
Fahrenheit is one of the strenghts of the imperial system over metric.
0F=damn cold, 100F = damn hot
Then ever ten degrees makes it easy to figure out the weather.
30's = winter jacket + gloves
40s' = winter jacket
50's = light jacket
60= lighter jacket
70= t-shirt
etc
Basically every ten tells you a different wardrobe change. Not like 22 vs 25c.
It's all relative. In the Middle East (Gulf countries), people wear parkas and mufflers when it's 60* out.
You wear a jacket when it's 60 degrees out?
Anonymous wrote:Typical anti-science American BS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
One thing I still can't get over after 15 years in the U.S. is Farenheit. Not getting it. Have to convert to Celsius if I want to know what to wear.
Fahrenheit is one of the strenghts of the imperial system over metric.
0F=damn cold, 100F = damn hot
Then ever ten degrees makes it easy to figure out the weather.
30's = winter jacket + gloves
40s' = winter jacket
50's = light jacket
60= lighter jacket
70= t-shirt
etc
Basically every ten tells you a different wardrobe change. Not like 22 vs 25c.
You wear a jacket when it's 60 degrees out?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They have done a bunch of studies and found that while the metric system is overall an easier system to use, people (even those who live metric) find that the English system works better in two instances. Weather/temperature and personal weight. In those cases, people found that they could describe their experience much better using the English system. For example, it is easier to describe a comfort zone as "the 70s" as opposed to "anywhere from 20 to 24.3".
I guess that's why the UK still uses both . . .
Add cooking to this list.
The US system is better for temperature, body measuring (height AND weight) and cooking.
Daily life stuff.
No it is not. You are just used to the us system 200 ml ~ 1 cup. 185 cm vs 6'1".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They have done a bunch of studies and found that while the metric system is overall an easier system to use, people (even those who live metric) find that the English system works better in two instances. Weather/temperature and personal weight. In those cases, people found that they could describe their experience much better using the English system. For example, it is easier to describe a comfort zone as "the 70s" as opposed to "anywhere from 20 to 24.3".
I guess that's why the UK still uses both . . .
Add cooking to this list.
The US system is better for temperature, body measuring (height AND weight) and cooking.
Daily life stuff.
Anonymous wrote:Don't you just hate it?
Especially when they are Americans on vacation.
Americans were on television being interviewed by American media and they started saying "meters" & "kilometers"
JESUS CHRIST!!!!!
Just say "feet" & "miles" like you would if you were here.
Being in Europe does not make you sophisticated.
Get over yourselves.
Anonymous wrote:They have done a bunch of studies and found that while the metric system is overall an easier system to use, people (even those who live metric) find that the English system works better in two instances. Weather/temperature and personal weight. In those cases, people found that they could describe their experience much better using the English system. For example, it is easier to describe a comfort zone as "the 70s" as opposed to "anywhere from 20 to 24.3".
I guess that's why the UK still uses both . . .
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The other benefit of the imperial system for length (feet/inches) is it's based on a 12-base system. 12 is evenly divisble by 2,3,4,6 so it's easy to take 1/3rd of the length exatly. Metric and lengths are only evenly divisible by 5 and 2. How often do you need to take 1/5th of the length vs 1/2 or 1/3?
Really? That's a benefit? As opposed it divisible by 2,5, 10, 100, 1000? So, divide by 1/3rd is easier than by half? So 1km is 1000 meters, but 1 mile is how many feet? 5280ft. So much easier.