Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stop using children to push an obnoxious, freedom-killing political agenda.
You figure out how to stop killing children then. If you want to own guns, you need to figure out how to keep them safe. Clean up your own mess.
That's an easy one, concentrate on parental skills. Mandatory annual parenting skills training and testing. Random drug testing of all parents. Random home inspections of all parents. Three strikes and you lose legal rights to your kids and they go to foster care.
Sounds good. You call Noah's mom, or Jett's dad, and tell them what terrible parents they are. Have the NRA help you make those calls, and maybe some of the Republicans in Congress too.
Well your basic premise is gun owners need better training and oversight of how they store/handle guns. All I'm saying is why stop there? Why not have more training and oversight of all things that cause deaths to innocents? The list of which is many more than just guns.
Or do you not want that because it may personally impact your freedoms? Which screams you're not really concerned for the innocents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What was the OP's point?
What's my point? Exactly what I wrote in the original post. I am starting this thread to people can see just one small part of the high price our society is paying to allow easy access to guns. In economic terms, the United States is paying $229 billion per year to deal with the costs of gun related deaths and injuries. http://www.businessinsider.com/gun-violence-costs-america-more-than-229-billion-every-year-2015-4 That's over $1800 per taxpayer every year to subsidize people who get their jollies from owning guns. But beyond the economic cost, there's also the human cost in wholly innocent lives destroyed by guns. That's the societal cost I'm highlighting with this thread.
As I made clear in the opening post, I'm realistic enough to acknowledge that eliminating all guns in the United States is not an option. I'm not even advocating an effort to stop the sale of new guns. I'm simply saying that our society needs to make some changes to ensure guns are distributed, stored, and used more safely. Stop the senseless deaths of innocents.
To be blunt, I consider it the responsibility of gun owners to develop and implement measures to reduce these costs and prevent needless gun deaths. It's a problem they are creating, so should take responsibility for solving it. However, gun owners and the gun industry have failed to control themselves. If gun owners irresponsibly will not advocate for gun safety regulations, then the burden falls on the rest of us.
I'm tired of everyone turning away from these innocent deaths, and forgetting the high cost our society pays to subsidize guns. No more subsidy for gun owners. Open your eyes to the true costs of your hobby.
People who own guns get $1800 a year from the government? Where do I sign up for this? This is even better than the Obama phone!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stop using children to push an obnoxious, freedom-killing political agenda.
You figure out how to stop killing children then. If you want to own guns, you need to figure out how to keep them safe. Clean up your own mess.
That's an easy one, concentrate on parental skills. Mandatory annual parenting skills training and testing. Random drug testing of all parents. Random home inspections of all parents. Three strikes and you lose legal rights to your kids and they go to foster care.
Sounds good. You call Noah's mom, or Jett's dad, and tell them what terrible parents they are. Have the NRA help you make those calls, and maybe some of the Republicans in Congress too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stop using children to push an obnoxious, freedom-killing political agenda.
You figure out how to stop killing children then. If you want to own guns, you need to figure out how to keep them safe. Clean up your own mess.
That's an easy one, concentrate on parental skills. Mandatory annual parenting skills training and testing. Random drug testing of all parents. Random home inspections of all parents. Three strikes and you lose legal rights to your kids and they go to foster care.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stop using children to push an obnoxious, freedom-killing political agenda.
You figure out how to stop killing children then. If you want to own guns, you need to figure out how to keep them safe. Clean up your own mess.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What was the OP's point?
What's my point? Exactly what I wrote in the original post. I am starting this thread to people can see just one small part of the high price our society is paying to allow easy access to guns. In economic terms, the United States is paying $229 billion per year to deal with the costs of gun related deaths and injuries. http://www.businessinsider.com/gun-violence-costs-america-more-than-229-billion-every-year-2015-4 That's over $1800 per taxpayer every year to subsidize people who get their jollies from owning guns. But beyond the economic cost, there's also the human cost in wholly innocent lives destroyed by guns. That's the societal cost I'm highlighting with this thread.
As I made clear in the opening post, I'm realistic enough to acknowledge that eliminating all guns in the United States is not an option. I'm not even advocating an effort to stop the sale of new guns. I'm simply saying that our society needs to make some changes to ensure guns are distributed, stored, and used more safely. Stop the senseless deaths of innocents.
To be blunt, I consider it the responsibility of gun owners to develop and implement measures to reduce these costs and prevent needless gun deaths. It's a problem they are creating, so should take responsibility for solving it. However, gun owners and the gun industry have failed to control themselves. If gun owners irresponsibly will not advocate for gun safety regulations, then the burden falls on the rest of us.
I'm tired of everyone turning away from these innocent deaths, and forgetting the high cost our society pays to subsidize guns. No more subsidy for gun owners. Open your eyes to the true costs of your hobby.
Anonymous wrote:Stop using children to push an obnoxious, freedom-killing political agenda.
having a swimming pool in a household is something like 4.3 to 5.6 times as likely to lead to an accidental death as having a firearm, when we look at the numbers for all age groups.
For children less than 15, the difference is more like 19 to 25 times as likely.
Anonymous wrote:I read just this morning that only 3% of gun deaths are civilians using a gun for protection/stopping a crime.
I'll see if I can find that article to post. It said something about people stopping crimes without a weapon of any kind were much higher (tackling someone, that kind of thing)

Anonymous wrote:What was the OP's point?