Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Do any of you women think it's difficult to be with a conservative husband since so many of their issues align against women's rights? How can you respect a man who thinks Trump should be president when he so clearly hates women? How is that okay in your husband's eyes?
+1 Was thinking the same thing
I honestly think even having to ask this is a reflection of how segregated our culture now is politically. I really, really hate Trump but it's hard to spend a meaningful amount of time with a Trump supporter without realizing that they are also human beings too with positives and negatives and not weird cartoon characters.
The same thing could be said about slave merchants , segregationists , white supremacists , nazis, fascists and jihadist sympathizes
LOL. You are unbalanced. Liberals have been trained for two generations of the academy on victimhood and protest as the pinnacle of intellectual achievement that you have completely lost all sense of values and perspective. Classical liberalism, skepticism of the state, these are all valid western ideologies. But you twits just want to have an intellectually bankrupt tantrum whenever someone disagrees with you. Immediate resort to the examples you cite is evidence enough. I'm sure you and your friends feel sufficiently superior though, so that's all that matters.
--smarter than you, and not a Trump supporter, but this is really getting absurd
Yeah not a trump supporter my ass, well if you think it's getting absurd , too bad for you. It's not going anywhere . What I find amazing is that in your silly little response you and like every other evil apologists consistently fail make a strong case why fascists sympathizers shouldn't be muscled . Liberalism this, liberalism that. You clearly have no clue what intellectual bankruptcy is. Stop punching above your weight, you're hurting yourself
.
I can't speak for that PP, but as one PP who stopped responding to you: I am perfectly capable of making a rational and reasoned response to you, but would be an idiot to do so, because you've made it clear you are not open to being proven wrong. I am literally more likely to convince a Trump supporter to switch to Clinton than I am to convince you of anything at all. You have said literally nothing suggesting that you have sufficient cognitive flexibility to understand someone else's point of view. Frankly, the only reason I'm responding to you in any fashion is on the off chance an open minded moderate is reading these posts and becomes convinced that somehow your view of the world reflects what rational progressives actually believe. I have no hope of changing your mind. It would be great, however, not to be lumped in with you by others.
Cute. Not. As I've said bigotry deserves muscular responses . Go ask Winston Churchill how his cognitive flexibility worked. The fact that you believe you can convince a trump supporter to cast a vote for Hillary once again betrays either hubris , naïveté , dangerous ignorance or all the aforementioned . Unlike you , I see shit for what it is and assess the threat accordingly . What is there to understand about a man who has attracted people who believe the emancipation proclamation was a bad thing ? A man who has targeted specific ethnic groups and blames them for America's woes? Sounds familiar ?
Too often, we wonder why the Slavery, holocaust and fascism of this world had not only emerged but became societal norms , the answer could be found in vapid apologists like you. You've been on the defensive all along , it's not lost on me that you have pathetically failed to provide concise , elaborate and pertinent arguments about why you think the American neo Nazi crowd deserve understanding .History has never and will never be kind to passive twats like you