Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I totally get the "don't ask me to do it just because I'm young and female" mindset. But the problem is that administrative and junior levels tasks frequently ARE in young people's job descriptions, but they don't want to do them because they think it's beneath them. Sorry/not sorry: I have 20 years experience, and you have been here for 6 months -- you need to dial the phone for the conference call and pass out the agendas. I did that shit when I was 23, and you can too.
I have a couple of issues with these statements. First of all, sure, if someone has seniority in a job and they ask someone in an entry level position to handle admin tasks that are part of the entry level position, then that's fine.
But I have a problem with assuming that just because someone is younger than you are and new to the organization that they somehow should have to do all of the grunt work. A lot depends on the actual job. If the person is hired as an admin-type person, that's one thing. But if the person is hired on a team of specialists or as an attorney or in some function where, despite your time there, you are BOTH actually at equal levels, then the grunt work should be spread around and not just dumped on the new person because she/he is young.
And, no, I'm not in my 20s. I'm the one who has 20 years experience, but I would still not expect that the new person does all of the grunt tasks. I would expect everyone to participate and kind of take turns.
The best managers and most competent professionals I've worked with are the ones who, despite their seniority or their credentials or their experience, they didn't view other coworkers or even direct reports as "beneath" them and therefore the ones who should do all of the grunt work.
Anonymous wrote:I totally get the "don't ask me to do it just because I'm young and female" mindset. But the problem is that administrative and junior levels tasks frequently ARE in young people's job descriptions, but they don't want to do them because they think it's beneath them. Sorry/not sorry: I have 20 years experience, and you have been here for 6 months -- you need to dial the phone for the conference call and pass out the agendas. I did that shit when I was 23, and you can too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't imagine this. In 40, and when I worked as a CPA, if your boss asked you to do something, you did it. If you didn't know how, you figured it out. Kids nowadays!
I would do things but only to benefit my own career. I would do zero "for the organization" or "for my boss". Most of us know the company doesn't give a rats about us and will dump us as soon as they can get an H-1B on board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are there some people who refuse to do work because it wasn't outlined in a job description? Why do they not pitch in for the good of the company. These people seem to get away with it. Please enlighten me. I don't think this is normal.
Are you working for the federal gov? I had two 14s in my team like that, making over $120K/year and not able to open a spreadsheet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's also an equity issue. If you're asking me, the female employee, to do things that you don't ask the male employee to do -- answer the phones at the front desk, pick up the cupcakes for the party, etc. -- then yes, I will likely tell you it's not in my job description. It's not in Bob's job description and no one is making him do it, so why would you think it's okay to ask me to do it.
There's a lot of evidence that women are more likely to default to these roles, or be disciplined for not doing these kinds of emotional labor or menial tasks where as men would not
Anonymous wrote:Why are there some people who refuse to do work because it wasn't outlined in a job description? Why do they not pitch in for the good of the company. These people seem to get away with it. Please enlighten me. I don't think this is normal.
Anonymous wrote:Depends what your company culture is. Big companies this is the norm. I went from medium to big company where I got into hot water for doing anything even minutely out of my job description including forwarding an email to the person whose job description it was. Culture. I got frustrated and left for a smaller company where "not my job" gets you fired.
Anonymous wrote:It's also an equity issue. If you're asking me, the female employee, to do things that you don't ask the male employee to do -- answer the phones at the front desk, pick up the cupcakes for the party, etc. -- then yes, I will likely tell you it's not in my job description. It's not in Bob's job description and no one is making him do it, so why would you think it's okay to ask me to do it.
Anonymous wrote:Yes it's frustrating to have co-workers who don't put in 100%, but it's equally frustrating that managers and bosses and ceos try to get away with squeezing as much out of their workers as possible without adequate compensation. I've seen this in my own organization where one person was constantly given the same work as others in her department who were at a much higher pay grade. She asked for a promotion and was denied it on the excuse that there was no funding, so eventually she left, much to her boss's chagrin.