Troll post.

But I can't wait for the troll post that comes in to talk about her son saw pictures of her daughter's naked parts and asked why their parents hadn't paid for their daughter's labiaplasty. Because everyone knows that longer labia are disgusting and hard to keep clean and that girls should get their labia trimmed so as not to turn off potential sexual partners.

Anonymous wrote:Jewish and (fewer and fewer) American kids are the only ones on the planet who routinely get it done. OP's daughter will grow a heart and a brain someday and realize the man attached to the penis is more important (usually) than the cut or un-cut penis itself.

I'm married to an un-cut man and I have never had a problem with getting off every time nor with hygiene issues. As for hubby, he's happy he never got cut and it made masturbation throughout his life much easier.

+1

Anonymous wrote:Would never touch one? Oh, dear. You're missing out, honey. I know a lot of women in my age rage (around 40) who prefer uncirced.

First of all, how has she never seen her brother's penis before? My daughter bathed with friends or cousins starting before her first birthday. By 6, she understood some were cut and others were not, and how each looked. I'm pretty sure my teen is a lesbian, and I've never heard her or her friends talk about a preference. It seems like most kids are not circed these days. They're going to have trouble finding or figuring out who's cut.

If she's a lesbian she shouldn't have any trouble at all...

That said, I've been LOLing at my desk at this thread. Some of these responses are hilarious. The ones I had seen at 17 were only circ but then I moved to the West Coast and a group of boys in my 11/12th grade class had their own little gang of celebrated uncircumcision...."the worm crew." Hand signal and everything. I'm sure they do it to this day.

By the time I saw an uncirc'd in real life I thought it was ugly but it certainly didn't make me throw on the lights, demand he put his clothes on and kick him out of my bed.

Maybe you can use this opportunity to teach your daughter to be more accepting of others.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does your daughter know the difference??? I'm 40 and I've never seen an uncut one.

I'm 41 and never have either, off to Google it now

Eh? Well, I'm 41 and I've never seen a cut one. Ok, I'm from Europe. But it never occurred to me to have DS cut. I suppose I'll send him back to my native country to find a girl....

He'd be much better off than meeting one of the prude, spoiled, narcissistic, rich-white-trash-McLean daughters of moms who visit this forum.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How does your daughter know the difference??? I'm 40 and I've never seen an uncut one.

I'm 41 and never have either, off to Google it now

Eh? Well, I'm 41 and I've never seen a cut one. Ok, I'm from Europe. But it never occurred to me to have DS cut. I suppose I'll send him back to my native country to find a girl....

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Per my pediatrician 10 yrs ago when DS was born, it's 50/50 - so a girl is going to have to rule out at least 50% of eligible men if that's how she feels. I say, good luck to her. She's going to need a lot of it.

On the West Coast, it's way less than 50% that are cut. She'll grow up and get used to it.

PP here... and my DS was born on the West Coast. If lots of girls around here are like OP's DD, then I will encourage my DS to move back to the West Coast when he gets older, or maybe to Europe (DS has dual citizenship). People on the West coast/Europe seem to have more open minds. OP - I would tell your DD that there is already a dirth of eligible men around here, so don't limit herself to just cut men. That's like cutting off your nose to spite your face (yes, that was kind of a pun).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Your 17 yo and all her friends are sexually active?

You don't have to be sexually active to have an opinion about what a penis looks like.

You have to be sexually active to have an opinion on which one you will suck. That is the comment... From the daughter, nobody will "date" him.

She is too young and immature to know about penises and which one she will jump on.

"most" 17 yo are NOT sexually active, so maybe OP would want to wonder why her daughter and her friends are sluts. Or maybe... Most likely are just ignorant.

Hi, NP here, could you explain at what age women are no longer sluts if they have sex? Thanks.

Depends what age they stop mercilessly teasing people about their body parts, which they apparently see enough and touch enough to know which ones they like and don't like.... Or they don't which means they are just bitches, not actually sluts.

Your reply is nonsense. As expected.

Yes. I am nonsense to say the problem is the girls, see girls always get a feee pass... they can tease and that is okay? They can sleep around and that is okay? They can voice an opinion that is based on no knowlege and that is okay? Simply because they are girls.

Girls! Stop teasing boys!
Stop sleeping around! ()
Stop voicing uneducated opinions!

If a boy said his friends would never date a girls with small boobs we would be all over the boys. If we said a football player slept with the whole cheerleading squad we would call him a future rapist.

Parents need to hold their kids... all of them, including girls to a higher standard.

Women and men never stopbeing lsuts when they slut around.

Anonymous wrote:Sounds like Jamie and Circe -- sorry, Drew -- need to stop thinking about each others' genitalia.

LOL.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Your 17 yo and all her friends are sexually active?

You don't have to be sexually active to have an opinion about what a penis looks like.

You have to be sexually active to have an opinion on which one you will suck. That is the comment... From the daughter, nobody will "date" him.

She is too young and immature to know about penises and which one she will jump on.

"most" 17 yo are NOT sexually active, so maybe OP would want to wonder why her daughter and her friends are sluts. Or maybe... Most likely are just ignorant.

Hi, NP here, could you explain at what age women are no longer sluts if they have sex? Thanks.

Depends what age they stop mercilessly teasing people about their body parts, which they apparently see enough and touch enough to know which ones they like and don't like.... Or they don't which means they are just bitches, not actually sluts.

Your reply is nonsense. As expected.

OP: tell your daughter that if she (and her friends) believe that "how you look" (even down there) trumps everything else then she's in for a rude awaking when she ages. Just like all of us.

Jewish and (fewer and fewer) American kids are the only ones on the planet who routinely get it done. OP's daughter will grow a heart and a brain someday and realize the man attached to the penis is more important (usually) than the cut or un-cut penis itself.

I'm married to an un-cut man and I have never had a problem with getting off every time nor with hygiene issues. As for hubby, he's happy he never got cut and it made masturbation throughout his life much easier.

I didn't have my pre-apocalyptic sons' penises cut, and they do fine with girls in this area. And it's such an international area, of course a high percentage of boys are uncut.

Girls who are judging penises based on looks are not very experienced, as an uncut penis has many advantages in use. and certainly no disadvantages.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You get a free pass before 2012, but after that you should circ for medical reasons

why 2012?

8/27/2012
After a comprehensive review of the scientific evidence, the American Academy of Pediatrics found the health benefits of newborn male circumcision outweigh the risks

Haha. The ONLY Academy of Pediatrics of the first world countries. I wonder why?
Yes, it helps in prevention of urinary tract infection, penile cancer, and transmission of STDs. Well, infant girls are 10 times more likely to suffer from UTIs (because female urethras are shorter than male ones and they are more skin folds), but no one suggest routine circumcision of infant females. Also, penile cancer is very very rare (fewer than 20,000 cases in the U.S. per year) but so is breast cancer in males, but, again, no one is suggesting routine removal of male breasts to prevent breast cancer. And we all know how you can prevent STDs.

Sounds like Jamie and Circe -- sorry, Drew -- need to stop thinking about each others' genitalia.