Anonymous wrote:I don't know if it's a new thing, just easier to see now due to online dating. About 25 years ago, I had lost touch with 2 guys from my friend group. They did not seem interested in remaining friends or dating (they dated most of the other girls in our friend grouping at the time.) I assumed it was because I was more introverted and studious, not as attractive, etc...
Then word got around that I was going to a prestigious university for grad school. Both guys called me up about 2 months in the program and wanted to get together and go out. I did, and it seemed that they wanted to date my grad school, not me, and I realized that they had not wanted to go out with me all those years because ... I was too poor and not prestigious enough. Very pissed, because I assumed I had a crappy personality and/or unattractive, not that I was just less rich than my friends. Never went out with them again.
Anonymous wrote:Men no longer are raised by parents who believe in pulling them up by the boot straps. Most of them want to graduate from college, find a job that lands them in the 90k+ salary range with zero to limited experience. They expect the woman to pay for the date, or go dutch, and they expect the woman to own a home before they do. Women who are smart with their money are desirable, but women who are able to make bank can fund these (pathetic) high maintenance men to take the pressure off being the breadwinner.
Anonymous wrote:I just find it funny the same men who wouldn't give me the time of day in my 20's are now chasing after me in my 30's once they heard from my brother I am making a nice 6-figure salary from running my own business!
I have dated some, but have NOT been married yet (by choice, I was proposed to 2x and declined both as they were both not suitable for me- NOT because of their salary but due to their cheating on me! At least they were man enough to admit they were wrong, we are still on speaking terms no hate here)....
Now I see what the men mean by "gold diggers"...now its just in reverse the men are digging for my "gold"!
Things that make you go hmmm....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because women that has no money will clean us out if divorced. I'd rather have one with money and she can keep hers as long as I keep mine ( I also make good money).
Why get married at all? Can you help who you fall in love with? What if its betty and not veronica? If you stay with veronica and her high maintenance snobby ass you could be miserable.
LOL This is the question many married people ask themselves these days. Why indeed.
"In love" is for very young people who truly can't help themselves. Good thing they rarely have much to lose. When you get older and accumulate assets, your attitude towards coupling and motives behind it changes. You don't rush into things just because your hormones are acting up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Men no longer are raised by parents who believe in pulling them up by the boot straps. Most of them want to graduate from college, find a job that lands them in the 90k+ salary range with zero to limited experience. They expect the woman to pay for the date, or go dutch, and they expect the woman to own a home before they do. Women who are smart with their money are desirable, but women who are able to make bank can fund these (pathetic) high maintenance men to take the pressure off being the breadwinner.
Losers in my book. We know tons, many are divorced now because the women wised up. I know 2 who are living in rentals at 45 years old, I know they don't have decent retirements either. Their only hope is snagging some rich oldly.
Yes because women do not do this? Wow you all are off in Lala live. The stats I see say 35% of men and 32% of women 22-32 live at home. So I guess those women are loser too? No gold digging woman would think 80k a year is worth crossing the street over. LOL
80k is Cumberland rich. Not even making the radar in this area. Lol.
I'm also thinking that it depends on demographics.Anonymous wrote:I know blue collar level guys who are doing this; my friend (who lives in a blue collar area) has supported 3 of guys over the past few years while they were dating. DH has pointedly asked me--"do any guys in your home area work or do they just live off women?" With that said, it is harder for the guys to find work that pays what their Dad's were paid; most of it is service industry work, and the blue collar trades are harder to get into (and full of guys.)
Not sure about the men on this forum. Maybe the need for 2 incomes in the DC area makes them not want to date anyone who does not earn as much as they do? 80K seems rather high though--they will probably eliminate many younger attractive college graduates getting their state in the DC metro, many federal employees, and non-profit employees.
Maybe it is just equal opportunity to be a gold digger, like a certain subset of women?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Men no longer are raised by parents who believe in pulling them up by the boot straps. Most of them want to graduate from college, find a job that lands them in the 90k+ salary range with zero to limited experience. They expect the woman to pay for the date, or go dutch, and they expect the woman to own a home before they do. Women who are smart with their money are desirable, but women who are able to make bank can fund these (pathetic) high maintenance men to take the pressure off being the breadwinner.
Losers in my book. We know tons, many are divorced now because the women wised up. I know 2 who are living in rentals at 45 years old, I know they don't have decent retirements either. Their only hope is snagging some rich oldly.
Yes because women do not do this? Wow you all are off in Lala live. The stats I see say 35% of men and 32% of women 22-32 live at home. So I guess those women are loser too? No gold digging woman would think 80k a year is worth crossing the street over. LOL
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't know if it's a new thing, just easier to see now due to online dating. About 25 years ago, I had lost touch with 2 guys from my friend group. They did not seem interested in remaining friends or dating (they dated most of the other girls in our friend grouping at the time.) I assumed it was because I was more introverted and studious, not as attractive, etc...
Then word got around that I was going to a prestigious university for grad school. Both guys called me up about 2 months in the program and wanted to get together and go out. I did, and it seemed that they wanted to date my grad school, not me, and I realized that they had not wanted to go out with me all those years because ... I was too poor and not prestigious enough. Very pissed, because I assumed I had a crappy personality and/or unattractive, not that I was just less rich than my friends. Never went out with them again.
How is this gold digging? Prestigious grad school =\= rich. Why would you be pissed? Manny woman make the same choice with men. They want the resume not the man. Welcome to the real world!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because women that has no money will clean us out if divorced. I'd rather have one with money and she can keep hers as long as I keep mine ( I also make good money).
Why get married at all? Can you help who you fall in love with? What if its betty and not veronica? If you stay with veronica and her high maintenance snobby ass you could be miserable.
LOL This is the question many married people ask themselves these days. Why indeed.
"In love" is for very young people who truly can't help themselves. Good thing they rarely have much to lose. When you get older and accumulate assets, your attitude towards coupling and motives behind it changes. You don't rush into things just because your hormones are acting up.
Anonymous wrote:I don't know if it's a new thing, just easier to see now due to online dating. About 25 years ago, I had lost touch with 2 guys from my friend group. They did not seem interested in remaining friends or dating (they dated most of the other girls in our friend grouping at the time.) I assumed it was because I was more introverted and studious, not as attractive, etc...
Then word got around that I was going to a prestigious university for grad school. Both guys called me up about 2 months in the program and wanted to get together and go out. I did, and it seemed that they wanted to date my grad school, not me, and I realized that they had not wanted to go out with me all those years because ... I was too poor and not prestigious enough. Very pissed, because I assumed I had a crappy personality and/or unattractive, not that I was just less rich than my friends. Never went out with them again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because women that has no money will clean us out if divorced. I'd rather have one with money and she can keep hers as long as I keep mine ( I also make good money).
Why get married at all? Can you help who you fall in love with? What if its betty and not veronica? If you stay with veronica and her high maintenance snobby ass you could be miserable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because women that has no money will clean us out if divorced. I'd rather have one with money and she can keep hers as long as I keep mine ( I also make good money).
This is an excellent point, and I wouldn't fault a guy for that. If I were to remarry, protecting my assets would be my #1 concern. A major reason why I won't even think of remarrying should things go south with DH. I am very much done with legal obligations and all that nonsense.