Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly you didn't post a single thing about your pregnancy on facebook, so she figured you'd never post a baby pic either. She does have a right as a grandma to post pics of her grandkids. I mean would she take pics of the other 4 and black out your baby's face?
Uh, no she does not. The child has a right to not hate his or her image posted on social media. The end.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly you didn't post a single thing about your pregnancy on facebook, so she figured you'd never post a baby pic either. She does have a right as a grandma to post pics of her grandkids. I mean would she take pics of the other 4 and black out your baby's face?
Um, yeah, no, it's up to the parents.
You can take a picture of anyone you want and post it on FB. Someone may not like it, but you can certainly go to Safeway today's take someone's picture and post it on FB with the caption "went to Safeway today".
And if this person finds out about it and wants it removed, FB will remove it.
Right, but the issue was if Grandma or anyone has a "right" to post it on FB, and yes, yes they do.
The baby? Questionable. Certainly not the mom who has just given birth. Not "right".
Anonymous wrote:Honestly you didn't post a single thing about your pregnancy on facebook, so she figured you'd never post a baby pic either. She does have a right as a grandma to post pics of her grandkids. I mean would she take pics of the other 4 and black out your baby's face?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly you didn't post a single thing about your pregnancy on facebook, so she figured you'd never post a baby pic either. She does have a right as a grandma to post pics of her grandkids. I mean would she take pics of the other 4 and black out your baby's face?
Um, yeah, no, it's up to the parents.
You can take a picture of anyone you want and post it on FB. Someone may not like it, but you can certainly go to Safeway today's take someone's picture and post it on FB with the caption "went to Safeway today".
And if this person finds out about it and wants it removed, FB will remove it.
Right, but the issue was if Grandma or anyone has a "right" to post it on FB, and yes, yes they do.
This is maturity.Anonymous wrote:My BIL was the first one to post about our new baby, both times. He didn't post a picture, just the news... and he tagged DH (I'm not actually on FB or he would have tagged me). It did not occur to me to be upset about this in the least, or feel anything other than happiness. He was posting that he had a new nephew. That is news in his life! I'm happy he cares enough to share it.
Unflattering photos of me I would have been a little miffed about, but if not obviously and objectively unflattering I probably would have let go.
Photos of my kids on fb... if my sister and BIL take my kid to the pumpkin patch, they're going to post a pic of it on FB. I'm happy they do.
When I want something NOT shared on facebook, I proactively tell people. E.g., I did NOT want my pregnancy discussed on FB and I made that clear to everyone. I think this day in age the presumption is that you get to share your own news and your own photos unless told not to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly you didn't post a single thing about your pregnancy on facebook, so she figured you'd never post a baby pic either. She does have a right as a grandma to post pics of her grandkids. I mean would she take pics of the other 4 and black out your baby's face?
Um, yeah, no, it's up to the parents.
You can take a picture of anyone you want and post it on FB. Someone may not like it, but you can certainly go to Safeway today's take someone's picture and post it on FB with the caption "went to Safeway today".
And if this person finds out about it and wants it removed, FB will remove it.
Anonymous wrote:My BIL was the first one to post about our new baby, both times. He didn't post a picture, just the news... and he tagged DH (I'm not actually on FB or he would have tagged me). It did not occur to me to be upset about this in the least, or feel anything other than happiness. He was posting that he had a new nephew. That is news in his life! I'm happy he cares enough to share it.
Unflattering photos of me I would have been a little miffed about, but if not obviously and objectively unflattering I probably would have let go.
Photos of my kids on fb... if my sister and BIL take my kid to the pumpkin patch, they're going to post a pic of it on FB. I'm happy they do.
When I want something NOT shared on facebook, I proactively tell people. E.g., I did NOT want my pregnancy discussed on FB and I made that clear to everyone. I think this day in age the presumption is that you get to share your own news and your own photos unless told not to.
Anonymous wrote:You had nine months to decide how to handle the birth of this child on social media and to communicate your wishes/boundaries with your inner circle.
Why didn't you?