Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We already pay for welfare, food stamps, housing, phones, etc, now we gotta pay for them to not kill, rape and steal. Wow! Liberals
You do realize we pay for them when we put them in jail too, right? Probably a lot more than we pay through this program. At least this way, they might not commit a crime against an innocent person.
Anonymous wrote:Based on a successful program in California. I wonder who would be a beneficiary of the program?
http://wtop.com/dc/2016/02/dc-bill-would-pay-people-stipends-not-to-commit-crimes/
The D.C. Council voted unanimously Tuesday to approve a bill that includes a proposal to pay residents a stipend not to commit crimes. It’s based on a program in Richmond, California, that advocates say has contributed to deep reductions in crime there.
Under the bill, city officials would identify up to 200 people a year who are considered at risk of either committing or becoming victims of violent crime. Those people would be directed to participate in behavioral therapy and other programs. If they fulfill those obligations and stay out of trouble, they would be paid.
Anonymous wrote:Never mind, DC is not going to pay residents not to commit crimes.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-politics/dc-abandons-plan-to-pay-criminals-to-stay-out-of-trouble/2016/05/05/6e4ad018-12af-11e6-8967-7ac733c56f12_story.html?hpid=hp_local-news_dccrime-1115am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obama's "criminal justice reform" has already released 6,000 convicted felons onto America's streets.
Convicts - who would otherwise be in prison right now.
And DeBlasio is busy dis-mantling the exact programs that vastly reduced crime in NYC.
So it is no surprise that the crime rate is going up.
We are now led to believe that the solution to increasing crime is simply to "throw money at the problem" ??
This "solution" is utterly stupid. If this idea is representative of "progressive thinking," then count me out.
isn't a key part of that, that the people are supposed to be "non violent" offenders?
Anonymous wrote:
But the cost of a police officer is only a fraction of the cost of ineffective policing. There's also court costs, incarceration costs, and the cost to victims. And none of it working.
The benefit goes beyond reducing violence by transforming offenders into law-abiding citizens.
Anonymous wrote:We already pay for welfare, food stamps, housing, phones, etc, now we gotta pay for them to not kill, rape and steal. Wow! Liberals
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obama's "criminal justice reform" has already released 6,000 convicted felons onto America's streets.
Convicts - who would otherwise be in prison right now.
And DeBlasio is busy dis-mantling the exact programs that vastly reduced crime in NYC.
So it is no surprise that the crime rate is going up.
We are now led to believe that the solution to increasing crime is simply to "throw money at the problem" ??
This "solution" is utterly stupid. If this idea is representative of "progressive thinking," then count me out.
isn't a key part of that, that the people are supposed to be "non violent" offenders?
Anonymous wrote:Obama's "criminal justice reform" has already released 6,000 convicted felons onto America's streets.
Convicts - who would otherwise be in prison right now.
And DeBlasio is busy dis-mantling the exact programs that vastly reduced crime in NYC.
So it is no surprise that the crime rate is going up.
We are now led to believe that the solution to increasing crime is simply to "throw money at the problem" ??
This "solution" is utterly stupid. If this idea is representative of "progressive thinking," then count me out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Obama's "criminal justice reform" has already released 6,000 convicted felons onto America's streets.
Convicts - who would otherwise be in prison right now.
And DeBlasio is busy dis-mantling the exact programs that vastly reduced crime in NYC.
So it is no surprise that the crime rate is going up.
We are now led to believe that the solution to increasing crime is simply to "throw money at the problem" ??
This "solution" is utterly stupid. If this idea is representative of "progressive thinking," then count me out.
I know, right? DeBlasio was clearly responsible for the uptick in crime in DC last year.
Laugh it up. The dead bodies will pile up at an increasing rate in DC; just as they are in Baltimore. And NYC. Policies, like elections, have consequences.
But you go on; make jokes.
Did you read the article? In California, when they implemented the program, the homicide and assault rates decreased dramatically. It may not work as well in DC as it did in CA, but there's no reason to think that the program will result in dead bodies piling up. More generally, there's no reason to think that DC is like Baltimore or will become like Baltimore.
I don't give a damn how they do it in California. Paying criminals not to commit crimes is a stupid idea.
You can pay a mobster protection money (extortion) and they will not beat you up. Same exact thing.
I have a better idea: arrest, prosecute, and incarcerate. At least they will not be victimizing the public while they are locked up.