Anonymous wrote:The fundamental assumption of your ad hominem attack is incorrect. Believe it or not there are at least two posters to this thread who will be forever freaked-out by Beauvoir's administrative decisions, particularly the hiring of a pedophile. It's not "sock-puppeting" Beau-booster, it is an actual new poster with the same opinion.
BTW, nice try - shooting the messenger because you can't refute the message?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:St. Alban's, St. Alban's, St. Alban's
(assuming none of the kiddie-touchers at Beauvoir get to your DS first, right? Or is St.A so important that you don't mind the kiddie-touching?)
Hey - for as gross as the PP's post was, there's truth to it. How in the hell does such a small school manage to hire a pedophile?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:St. Alban's, St. Alban's, St. Alban's
(assuming none of the kiddie-touchers at Beauvoir get to your DS first, right? Or is St.A so important that you don't mind the kiddie-touching?)
Hey - for as gross as the PP's post was, there's truth to it. How in the hell does such a small school manage to hire a pedophile?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:St. Alban's, St. Alban's, St. Alban's
(assuming none of the kiddie-touchers at Beauvoir get to your DS first, right? Or is St.A so important that you don't mind the kiddie-touching?)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:St. Alban's, St. Alban's, St. Alban's
(assuming none of the kiddie-touchers at Beauvoir get to your DS first, right? Or is St.A so important that you don't mind the kiddie-touching?)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:St. Alban's, St. Alban's, St. Alban's
(assuming none of the kiddie-touchers at Beauvoir get to your DS first, right? Or is St.A so important that you don't mind the kiddie-touching?)
Anonymous wrote:St. Alban's, St. Alban's, St. Alban's
Anonymous wrote:Nysmith, St. Anselm's, and HOMESCHOOL