Anonymous wrote:Op here. Thanks for the input and criticism as that's why I asked is for honest opinions. I will set the money aside for household
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Whoever is doing the childcare IS working.
It's not the same, and it's not as valuable as earning money when finances are tight. Child care is menial labor that is easily outsourced. And it's not "working" when it's your own children -- it's fulfilling your responsibilities. "Work" is generally understood to mean income-producing labor.
Um, what? Infant care at a center in the outer burbs costs at least $350 a week. So, send the baby to a center, and they get $350 a week. Leave the baby home with mom, she gets zero.
Let's say her tax rate is 15 percent. She could go to work for $10/hr working 40 hours a week and earn $400, just enough to pay for daycare. Net benefit = zero. But maybe she can get a job that pays $15 an hour. Now she's making $510 a week after taxes. Net benefit = $110. Is it worth it? Really?
Or, she could get a part-time evening job and husband can stay home in the evenings. I'm not sure what kind of part-time gig he's got, but maybe switching things up like that every year or so would be a good idea, at least so that the baby gets to spend more time with dad.
Are you serious? You do realize that "they" do not EACH get $350 a week, and even if they did, this is a very, very low amount. Childminders at centers, and preschool teachers, make VERY little money. Could YOU live on $350 a week? You've just reinforced PP's point about childcare being menial labor.
Anonymous wrote:Raising a child well does actually take a lot of work, a strong grasp of child development, never ending patience, the ability to tolerate being home alone with no adults to talk to day after day, an understanding of nutrition, and so much more.
Anonymous wrote:Raising a child well does actually take a lot of work, a strong grasp of child development, never ending patience, the ability to tolerate being home alone with no adults to talk to day after day, an understanding of nutrition, and so much more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Whoever is doing the childcare IS working.
It's not the same, and it's not as valuable as earning money when finances are tight. Child care is menial labor that is easily outsourced. And it's not "working" when it's your own children -- it's fulfilling your responsibilities. "Work" is generally understood to mean income-producing labor.
Um, what? Infant care at a center in the outer burbs costs at least $350 a week. So, send the baby to a center, and they get $350 a week. Leave the baby home with mom, she gets zero.
Let's say her tax rate is 15 percent. She could go to work for $10/hr working 40 hours a week and earn $400, just enough to pay for daycare. Net benefit = zero. But maybe she can get a job that pays $15 an hour. Now she's making $510 a week after taxes. Net benefit = $110. Is it worth it? Really?
Or, she could get a part-time evening job and husband can stay home in the evenings. I'm not sure what kind of part-time gig he's got, but maybe switching things up like that every year or so would be a good idea, at least so that the baby gets to spend more time with dad.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Whoever is doing the childcare IS working.
It's not the same, and it's not as valuable as earning money when finances are tight. Child care is menial labor that is easily outsourced. And it's not "working" when it's your own children -- it's fulfilling your responsibilities. "Work" is generally understood to mean income-producing labor.
"Child care is menial labor that is easily outsourced."
This takes the cake for most ignorant statement of the week on DCUM. This mentality is why most kids are in trouble by high school. Drugs, alcohol, sex, habitual lying, etc.
The kids are NOT alright, you fool.