Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Private is overrated, especially in this economy.? Look at recent job placements?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not worth the stress. It will ruin u financially and u quality of life would suffer. ROI is not all that, but u do get the bumper sticker.? Did it for one kid, but will not be doing it for the other.
This depends on what you value. If you value your child receiving a certain type of education then maybe it is worth it. If you value having the latest car and eating out every not then maybe not.
Disagree with this point of view. Economy is changing rapidly and the job market will not even be recognizable to us when those in lower grades enter college. They may not even need to go to college, which makes early education that must more critical. If you measure sucess by the child going to HYP, then not a good ROI for you. Many of us want our kid to be articulate, well mannered, cultured, and enjoy learning. If you can manage private without lavish vacations each year, then I would recommend it. Public as currently structured will not meet the needs of future generations unless parents substantially invest in after school enrichment activities, which also cost money.
Anonymous wrote:Private is overrated, especially in this economy.? Look at recent job placements?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not worth the stress. It will ruin u financially and u quality of life would suffer. ROI is not all that, but u do get the bumper sticker.? Did it for one kid, but will not be doing it for the other.
This depends on what you value. If you value your child receiving a certain type of education then maybe it is worth it. If you value having the latest car and eating out every not then maybe not.
Anonymous wrote:I find the post interesting and puzzling all at the same time. I don't have a child in one of these schools yet, but we are applying. We will need substantial FA to send your DC to whichever school we are lucky to get into. This fact has not discouraged me from applying for a few reasons. One, we require FA simply because of the careers we have chosen to pursue. Both my husband and I graduated from a top 25 college and have advanced degrees. Nonetheless, we are both lifetime public servants by choice. Despite our annual income we have a deep commitment to making sure our children get the absolute best education possible. Part of that education is teaching them that life is about the choices you make including your income. Given my profession I certainly could be making 10 times more than I do had I chosen to not work in the public sector. I'm a lawyer, but a long time government lawyer by choice. I valued a commitment to public service and the flexibility of a less demanding work week so that I could be a present mother over earning a high salary. With that choice came certain consequences. We wont be buying a new car every year, we wont be taking lavish vacations every year, and they wont be wearing shoes and clothes that cost $500. However, we plan on working hard to instill in them IF they want those material things they are being provided an excellent education so that they can pursue whatever career choice they want and earn however much they want to provide those things FOR THEMSELVES! Does that mean they may not feel slighted as they grow and see other kids with all of the material things? No, it doesn't and of course they will. However, adversity builds character. Period. It isn't my job to protect them from all of the ills of the world, its to instill in them skills to handle any obstacle they face.
Heck I was on FA in college and never took a lavish Spring Break vacation and had to hear all about my roommates and dorm mates fancy vacations. Guess what? That's life. Unless you are in the 1% there will always be someone who can afford more than you. More importantly, while money can certainly make you more comfortable it doesn't define happiness. I don't want to suggest the OP concerns are valid, but I think the response should be -- yeah there may be challenges, but you have to decide why you want this education for your child...and THAT has to be your focus.
Private is overrated, especially in this economy.? Look at recent job placements?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not worth the stress. It will ruin u financially and u quality of life would suffer. ROI is not all that, but u do get the bumper sticker.? Did it for one kid, but will not be doing it for the other.
This depends on what you value. If you value your child receiving a certain type of education then maybe it is worth it. If you value having the latest car and eating out every not then maybe not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It would be helpful if people specified elementary, middle or high school. My experience is that the kids don't really notice or care about the differences in incomes/ experiences until middle school.
I disagree. Even little kids want to go to the same summer camp as their friend and have the same video games as their friends or go to the same private swim team or soccer club or have their birthday party at the same place. It starts early -- it isn't about noticing the differences, so much as expecting and asking for the same. So you start saying no earlier and more frequently and teaching those life lessons PPs talk about pretty much right away. Nothing wrong with that, but it does start right away.
BTW, it also happens to a degree in the public schools, particularly if the school has economic diversity. Some do, some don't. It's all relative.
Anonymous wrote:It would be helpful if people specified elementary, middle or high school. My experience is that the kids don't really notice or care about the differences in incomes/ experiences until middle school.
Anonymous wrote:It's not worth the stress. It will ruin u financially and u quality of life would suffer. ROI is not all that, but u do get the bumper sticker.? Did it for one kid, but will not be doing it for the other.
Anonymous wrote:We didn't get to Europe until oldest DC was in 5th grade. DC was one of the last in her class to go there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are a FA family at Sidwell. Oldest kid now is a Sr. I can honestly say neither of my children has ever asked why we have so much less money than their classmates. Some times she rolls her eyes at the homes of her friends or their vacations if they are truly over the top, but both kids understand that we are sending them to Sidwell so they can get a great education and get to travel and take part in school events that would be beyond our reach if they went to public. (The school pays a share of these expenses). BTW we do not see school as a gateway to the Ivy league or a pathway to riches. We are comfortable in our small home and would be happy if our kids are employed after college in fields that are interesting and provide enough income for them to be financially independent. We are happy and feel like we belong at school functions and that our kids bring a lot to the table in terms of their interests and participation in the Sidwell community. The bottom line is that I think it depends on the attitude of the parents. If it's going to bother you, you may transmit your concerns to your kids without meaning to.
I could have written this as well except not FA, just barely able to afford it, but in our opinion, totally worth it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We didn't get to Europe until oldest DC was in 5th grade. DC was one of the last in her class to go there.
At any earlier age, how would the kids benefit at all?
Our DC only traveled as a young child because it was convenient for us and the grandparents aren't babysitting types. I can testify that going to Europe gave my preschool DC no advantage in Spanish, French, or Italian. Second graders simply don't compare their trips to the Louvre to the Uffizi. They compare the roller coaster at Kings Dominion to Six Flags. Learning to ski on the bunny hop at Ski Liberty is as thrilling for a 7 year old as Kitzbuhel. And the beach is as fun whether you drive or fly there.