Anonymous wrote:PANDAS PP, can you please share what age your son was when he was diagnosed with PANDAS? My child is suffering from sudden onset of severe OCD, and I am feeling hopeless in trying to get him evaluated and treated. My pediatrician really knows nothing about PANDAS and referred me to a neurologist who was pretty unhelpful as well. They both offered to write him a prescription for an SSRI, but neither one would treat him with antibiotics, steroids or the other therapies being investigated for PANDAS - mostly because his strep test was negative. While I am open to the SSRI, I would also like him to be evaluated and if an infection/inflammation (not picked up by the Rapid Strep) is ongoing to have it eradicated. Because of the strep test being negative, we are also not eligible for the NIH study. In any case, my son is not even 4 yet so I don't know if ERP would even be a possibility for him. Where did you go for ERP? Sorry for all the questions. Just so desperate to want to find help for him. TIA.
Anonymous wrote:My child's side effects were in no way life threatening, but they lowered his quality of life, which already was pretty miserable owing to the constant OCD, which occurred even as he slept so there was no relief ever, to an intolerable level. Those years of my son's life were pretty grim and at times we are without any hope things would ever get better. DS was even rejected from an NIH PANDAS program because he was deemed too chronic, but that did not prevent the young doctor who delivered the news from gratuitously implying that the only reason we wanted to be part of the the NIH study was to get free medical care and they had so many other people coming to them who were poor but, no, she could not recommend anyone in the private sector who could help. She judged us to be high SES and, thus, unworthy of any publicly paid help. I was unable to return back to work that day because of the overwhelming sense of hopelessness I felt that there was no help anywhere for my DS.
I'm appalled!I'm someone who frequently recommends NIH studies because we've had such positive experiences with several of them (with a couple of different kids). NEVER has research team implied that there was anything wrong with us looking for assistance via a research study. In every single study we've been in, they had a list of providers if we needed additional assistance. Those providers may not have been the closest to us but at least I had someone else to contact. Not once did I ever feel anything but support and understanding from them. How outrageous!
If you have the energy and gumption, I'd contact the lead researcher and share your feelings. What you experienced is unacceptable - and discourages people from participating. This isn't the kind of research where SES has an impact. I'm sorry you experienced this and I hope it doesn't turn you off from other studies.
My child's side effects were in no way life threatening, but they lowered his quality of life, which already was pretty miserable owing to the constant OCD, which occurred even as he slept so there was no relief ever, to an intolerable level. Those years of my son's life were pretty grim and at times we are without any hope things would ever get better. DS was even rejected from an NIH PANDAS program because he was deemed too chronic, but that did not prevent the young doctor who delivered the news from gratuitously implying that the only reason we wanted to be part of the the NIH study was to get free medical care and they had so many other people coming to them who were poor but, no, she could not recommend anyone in the private sector who could help. She judged us to be high SES and, thus, unworthy of any publicly paid help. I was unable to return back to work that day because of the overwhelming sense of hopelessness I felt that there was no help anywhere for my DS.
I'm someone who frequently recommends NIH studies because we've had such positive experiences with several of them (with a couple of different kids). NEVER has research team implied that there was anything wrong with us looking for assistance via a research study. In every single study we've been in, they had a list of providers if we needed additional assistance. Those providers may not have been the closest to us but at least I had someone else to contact. Not once did I ever feel anything but support and understanding from them. How outrageous!
Anonymous wrote:PANDAS PP here. I was surprised that I was labeled arrogant and anti-med because I elaborated, as requested, on side effects my child had on an SSRI. I took pains to state I am not anti-med. I would have like the meds to have worked and to have worked without side effects.
Having a child with severe PANDAS OCD is trying enough without also having to drastically rearrange everyone's schedule to do therapy in some distant place twice a week and having to do ERP homework every night. Therapy did work for us, and I am grateful, but there was also a huge cost in terms of time, money, energy, and my relationship with my child. Perhaps I was not clear enough about that. The anti-meds people who think others are just too lazy to do therapy and want quick fixes etc. never seem to factor in all of the many costs of what it can take for therapy to be effective.
My child's side effects were in no way life threatening, but they lowered his quality of life, which already was pretty miserable owing to the constant OCD, which occurred even as he slept so there was no relief ever, to an intolerable level. Those years of my son's life were pretty grim and at times we are without any hope things would ever get better. DS was even rejected from an NIH PANDAS program because he was deemed too chronic, but that did not prevent the young doctor who delivered the news from gratuitously implying that the only reason we wanted to be part of the the NIH study was to get free medical care and they had so many other people coming to them who were poor but, no, she could not recommend anyone in the private sector who could help. She judged us to be high SES and, thus, unworthy of any publicly paid help. I was unable to return back to work that day because of the overwhelming sense of hopelessness I felt that there was no help anywhere for my DS.
I am glad we made it through, albeit with a huge amount of hard work, but even though it is years later I am surprised how much it stung to have my attempts to describe our experience of SSRI side effects met with derision from posters on this forum.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:18:19, this is hard stuff. We're all trying to do what's right for our kids and when you find the thing that works, it's so hard not to feel guilty for not trying it sooner, whether it's therapy or meds or both.
PP here. Thank you for saying that. Part of my regret is also how I jumped to conclusions about other parents giving meds. I was so scared of the idea of meds for my child that I vehemently took a contrary position to justify to myself that I was doing the right thing by not medicating (despite all very obvious evidence to the contrary). Not only did my fear leave my own child suffering needlessly, I have no doubt that I communicated my disapproval to any number of parents who made that very difficult decision for themselves. It's an important lesson in not judging other parents when we have no idea what they have gone through or what are their family circumstances. If nothing else, it also makes me less tolerant of anyone pushing an anti-med agenda under the guise of concern (even if they don't realize it).
Anonymous wrote:18:19, this is hard stuff. We're all trying to do what's right for our kids and when you find the thing that works, it's so hard not to feel guilty for not trying it sooner, whether it's therapy or meds or both.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We medicating DS first. It didn't work well and the side effects became intolerable.
The above quote is from the 5th post in the thread. It clearly mentions side effects.
Sorry, but it makes no mention of which side effects her child suffered, only that they were intolerable.
First you complain that there's zero mention of side effects. Then when it's pointed out that people are clearly discussing side effects, that's not good enough either, because they are not specific enough.
You have an agenda. We are not on this forum to fulfill that agenda.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think the PANDAS/ERP poster is the same as the anti-meds poster, but I think your point is valid. I don't any parent makes the decision to use medication lightly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We medicating DS first. It didn't work well and the side effects became intolerable.
The above quote is from the 5th post in the thread. It clearly mentions side effects.
Sorry, but it makes no mention of which side effects her child suffered, only that they were intolerable.