Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My daughter's (9th grade--Walls) scores came in the mail this week. They are her scores from 8th grade--and there was an interesting graph showing the breakdown of the scores from her 8th grade class...as in the percentage of kids who received a 5, 4, 3, etc. There was an alarmingly low percentage of 5s, but I too have heard that that was expected.
Also people--this is ONE test. No one should be looking at this ONE score as a prediction of future success in anything.
also, some very smart children are just not great test-takers...and some kids in the average range can do very well on tests.
Just my two cents...
I agree with you that some very bright kids do not do well on tests for a variety of reasons, I am not sure the converse you articulated is true, that average kids get very high scores. What is your thinking on this, that they guess well? It may be that they are very bright at what is being tested but are not brilliant in other areas but I think you take away too much from the kids that do very well that it is not indicative of anything. Saying someone may just test well is a put down to those students. They knew the correct answers to the questions, you cannot guess your way to a 5.
I don't think test scores are the be all and end all and it is more important to me that my child be challenged to work hard than to get an A. But I am proud of my child's scores and I do think they represent how my child is performing more generally as it all tracks.
Anonymous wrote:My daughter's (9th grade--Walls) scores came in the mail this week. They are her scores from 8th grade--and there was an interesting graph showing the breakdown of the scores from her 8th grade class...as in the percentage of kids who received a 5, 4, 3, etc. There was an alarmingly low percentage of 5s, but I too have heard that that was expected.
Also people--this is ONE test. No one should be looking at this ONE score as a prediction of future success in anything.
also, some very smart children are just not great test-takers...and some kids in the average range can do very well on tests.
Just my two cents...
Anonymous wrote:I haven't received my kids' PARCC scores yet. One at Latin, one at Brent. Should I be worried?
Anonymous wrote:I haven't received my kids' PARCC scores yet. One at Latin, one at Brent. Should I be worried?
Anonymous wrote:I haven't received my kids' PARCC scores yet. One at Latin, one at Brent. Should I be worried?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am appreciating the raw scores, because some other states (like Massachusetts) have published charts showing how raw scores correlate to percentiles in those states. I'll admit that the comparison is comforting (even though not mathematically precise).
Can you provide a link to what you describe? I did some googling around but did not fine the raw scores with correlations. TIA
Anonymous wrote:I am appreciating the raw scores, because some other states (like Massachusetts) have published charts showing how raw scores correlate to percentiles in those states. I'll admit that the comparison is comforting (even though not mathematically precise).
Anonymous wrote:For the PP with a child at Duke Ellington, did your report have the data breakout or just green check marks stating meets or exceeds???
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Both 2's, but has a 3.2 GPA. Guess she can do better.
Child is at Wilson.
Ok thank you! Mine got a 2 and 3 (at Deal) which freaked me out. He gets really good grades and seems fine academically-- though obviously not on the college or career track?![]()