Anonymous wrote:This is a pretty good (if slightly dated) article on why the real estate brokerage industry hasn't been disrupted.
http://www.economist.com/node/21554204
Key takeaways are agents have more value when homes don't sell themselves in a hot market (duh) and the independent nature of the business.
Anonymous wrote:I think there's a bit of a myth about how commissions (and transaction costs) are lower overseas.
Total round-trip transaction costs in Italy range from 8.88% to 22.70%of the property value. Registration tax is 3% for main homes and 7% for second homes. Nonresident buyers pay a fixed registration tax of 7%. The real estate agent’s commission is between 3% and 8% plus 22% VAT; typically split between buyer and seller.
France it's 1.5-5%, plus 20% VAT.
Germany is 3-6%, plus 19% VAT.
The Netherlands is 2%-4% plus 21% VAT.
Russia is 5% for properties under $2 million (it's 2% for higher value properties).
Switzerland is 3% to 5% plus 7.6% VAT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Redfin hasn't had nearly the success disrupting the real estate industry as Uber has had on the taxi industry. I mean, 10 years in it can't even get more than 3% market share in its home market of Seattle.
Besides, Redfin appears to be little more than a pyramid scheme to go public and enrich early investors. I don't see a sustainable business model. Mainly because they keep changing the model like every two weeks.
So the short answer is I don't think we'll see disintermediation of the real estate industry anytime soon.
Thanks, realtor. Change is inevitable.
Not a Realtor. Just someone in business who studies this sort of thing. But it's such a clever retort, calling people who disagree with you Realtors.
Look, digital has had disruptive effects on many industries...
1) Car buying. Auto dealers as we know it are nearly gone.
2) Taxi services. Uber.
3) Banking and capital markets have been transformed.
4) Insurance, etc.
But, no, not real estate. Redfin will launch its IPO and then slowly drift down in value as it misses earnings target after earnings target.
Not buying the car thing at all. The same dealerships exist that existed decades ago. Moving the haggling to email instead of in person isn't much of an improvement.
No, digitization has definitely shrunk the role dealerships play in the point of sale of a car, primarily by shifting asymmetry of information. Buyers now hold all the cards.
The chief reason this won't happen for real estate is the fact that it's a regulated industry. Cars are durable goods but still liquid assets. And anyone can sell them -- you don't need a license. There's also more supply of cars -- if you can't reach a price on a particular Prius, there's another one to buy.
You can definitely inject more transparency into the home buying process, but property is a more heavily regulated and illiquid commidity.
I've gotten better deals in person at a dealership. Plus dealers have service departments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does no one in the DC region offer flat fee brokerages? When I lived in Florida a few years ago, I used a fairly known flat fee realtor from another part of the state. The way it works is that his brokerage was totally licensed. I paid him something like $350, and there was also a clause that said that the buyer's agent had to pay another $350 to him. I offered her 2.5% I believe. I had my own photos taken for $175 and wrote the listing myself. Not hard to use Zillow for comps. For the flat fee, he posted the listing on the MLS and associated it with a brokerage - so it looks legit enough to other agents. Our house was well cared for and recently renovated, and I watch enough HGTV to know how to "stage" for selling. No surprise, we were under contract at asking on the first day. This worked well for me because I worked from home at the time, so easy to do open houses. The house sold for around $1m - so I saved a huge chunk of cash. We used an attorney for closing (very common in florida) so felt like I was covered for contract purposes.
All that said, when we were moving back to DC, we used an agent remotely to go check stuff out for us. We wouldn't have been able to buy without her help since we didn't want to come up for every house. She totally earned the 3% on that $1m house.
So do those types of flat fee brokers not exist here? They're not for everyone, but it sure worked for us.
![]()
zillow will give you the sales price so you can use it for comps...
Usually delayed and rarely do you get enough information to really make an apples-to-apples. I mean, good luck with it, but oy.
We're in DC and the info is usually up within a month of closing. We live in a rowhouse neighborhood and it's really easy to keep track of what comes on the market. It's also a very easy market for comparing comps: don't compare condos to rowhouses. Rowhouses are either the small variety (1300-1800 sf) or the large variety (over 2000), and within that are either "gut", "liveable" or "fully updated". Parking affects price, as does rentable basement apartment. You can get all of that from looking at the online listing pics (that stay up on redfin for ages). I had a realtor advise me my old house in Columbia Heights should ask $375k - based on comps. We thought that was crazy, listed at $525k and were under contract after the open house at full asking. This is not rocket science.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Does no one in the DC region offer flat fee brokerages? When I lived in Florida a few years ago, I used a fairly known flat fee realtor from another part of the state. The way it works is that his brokerage was totally licensed. I paid him something like $350, and there was also a clause that said that the buyer's agent had to pay another $350 to him. I offered her 2.5% I believe. I had my own photos taken for $175 and wrote the listing myself. Not hard to use Zillow for comps. For the flat fee, he posted the listing on the MLS and associated it with a brokerage - so it looks legit enough to other agents. Our house was well cared for and recently renovated, and I watch enough HGTV to know how to "stage" for selling. No surprise, we were under contract at asking on the first day. This worked well for me because I worked from home at the time, so easy to do open houses. The house sold for around $1m - so I saved a huge chunk of cash. We used an attorney for closing (very common in florida) so felt like I was covered for contract purposes.
All that said, when we were moving back to DC, we used an agent remotely to go check stuff out for us. We wouldn't have been able to buy without her help since we didn't want to come up for every house. She totally earned the 3% on that $1m house.
So do those types of flat fee brokers not exist here? They're not for everyone, but it sure worked for us.
![]()
zillow will give you the sales price so you can use it for comps...
Usually delayed and rarely do you get enough information to really make an apples-to-apples. I mean, good luck with it, but oy.
Anonymous wrote:
I've gotten better deals in person at a dealership. Plus dealers have service departments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Redfin? Probably never. It's been how long, they have under 1% of the market, are not profitable, and will go the way of pets.com shortly.
Doesn't mean that this market won't change drastically - maybe google has something in store. Or amazon. But housing is not a commodity market.
I'll answer a different way - real estate sales will change 10 years after car sales change, and I have no confidence that will be while I or my kids are alive.
Uh, the last two cars I bought, I negotiated with 10-15 dealers via email and it was a bidding war to get the lowest price so they'd win my business. Plus, with the internet, I could research exactly what a rational price would be.
WAY different from when I purchased cars in the past. Have you not bought a car lately? Because it really sounds like you don't know what you're talking about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Redfin hasn't had nearly the success disrupting the real estate industry as Uber has had on the taxi industry. I mean, 10 years in it can't even get more than 3% market share in its home market of Seattle.
Besides, Redfin appears to be little more than a pyramid scheme to go public and enrich early investors. I don't see a sustainable business model. Mainly because they keep changing the model like every two weeks.
So the short answer is I don't think we'll see disintermediation of the real estate industry anytime soon.
Thanks, realtor. Change is inevitable.
Not a Realtor. Just someone in business who studies this sort of thing. But it's such a clever retort, calling people who disagree with you Realtors.
Look, digital has had disruptive effects on many industries...
1) Car buying. Auto dealers as we know it are nearly gone.
2) Taxi services. Uber.
3) Banking and capital markets have been transformed.
4) Insurance, etc.
But, no, not real estate. Redfin will launch its IPO and then slowly drift down in value as it misses earnings target after earnings target.
Not buying the car thing at all. The same dealerships exist that existed decades ago. Moving the haggling to email instead of in person isn't much of an improvement.
No, digitization has definitely shrunk the role dealerships play in the point of sale of a car, primarily by shifting asymmetry of information. Buyers now hold all the cards.
The chief reason this won't happen for real estate is the fact that it's a regulated industry. Cars are durable goods but still liquid assets. And anyone can sell them -- you don't need a license. There's also more supply of cars -- if you can't reach a price on a particular Prius, there's another one to buy.
You can definitely inject more transparency into the home buying process, but property is a more heavily regulated and illiquid commidity.
Anonymous wrote:Probably 5 years or less. The Redfin business model requires agents to work for a salary and earn small commissions. The traditional companies have focused on having the largest number of agents rather than having agents who work. People are no longer willing to pay the transactional costs and wil use more streamlined, less expensive means of buying and selling properties.