Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:i would be ashamed to let my parents pay for my kid's college tuition if they were still alive. Have some pride people!
Why? I don't understand this. If your parents were multi-millionaires and asked you if you would accept a trust set up in your children's names to fund their college education, you ~ knowing that it would be one more avenue of estate planning for them AND would make your life easier ~ allowing you to be more generous now, spend more time with your family now, volunteer more now, travel more now ~ You would say, no thanks? Shove it mom and dad? Lets also assume that your parents are huge philanthropists, say, had their own charitable foundations set up? Literally, foundations?
Anonymous wrote:If your parents have more money than they could ever spend in a lifetime they should set up a scholarship fund for kids who don't have all the opportunities that, presumably, their grandchildren have had.
Anonymous wrote:i would be ashamed to let my parents pay for my kid's college tuition if they were still alive. Have some pride people!
Anonymous wrote:We don't accept financial help because DH and I live lives we can afford on our salaries. I know my parents would help if we had a major financial crisis like long-term unemployment, major medical bills, etc. but the greatest gift they give us is just that they are financially well off to not need us to help them (That was not the case with our ILs who have now passed away).
We recently did a big home renovation and we could cover the whole thing ourselves but my parents did distribute to us at that time my share of an inheritance from my grandmother (my dad happened to sell her property around the same time). DH initially though the money was coming as "help" from my parents and didn't want to accept it. When he understood it wasn't parental charity but an inheritance he was OK with it.
I think there is a big difference between a parent regularly subsidizing their kids in living a life they can't afford on their own vs. occasional generous gifts, grandkids education, etc. If your parents are paying your cellphone bill or your mortgage payment you need to grow up and start living within your means. It's just infantilizing. Have some self-respect.
Anonymous wrote:i would be ashamed to let my parents pay for my kid's college tuition if they were still alive. Have some pride people!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm in my 40's. No, I would never accept financial help from my family. I can support myself. I honestly can't fathom and have SO little respect for the posters above who are adults and who have their parents subsidizing their lifestyles. Gross.
Don't you get the fact that maybe the parents want to give the money? Especially while they are able to see the positive effect it has on their children and grandchildren while they are still alive. My parents are both passed now but it gave them real pleasure to slip me the occasional check for "big birthdays" and anniversaries. And I appreciated the gestures - the money was given and received with more love, and meant more to me, than the funds I got from the lawyers when their estate was wound up after they passed. My parents were at least financially comfortable and there were no strings attached to the gifts. Nor was it a case of subsidizing my lifestyle - more a case of them enjoying seeing and hearing of the results of their generosity. I fully intend to do the same for my children.
Sorry PP if generosity makes you queasy - to some of us it is an expression of thoughtfulness, care and doing the best we can for our loved ones.
PP here. I think there's a big difference between financial help and generous gifts. I said that I had little respect for the PP's above who have parents subsidizing their lifestyles -- like, they could normally only afford to live in a regular middle class house, but they have parents who bought them a 2 million dollar home, or who accept cars, regular rent payments, that sort of thing. The idea of giving and receiving generous gifts occasionally is lovely -- like, grandparents splurging on a big family cruise or something.
I have so many peers who live way above their means because they still expect "help" from their parents every month...and we're in our 40's! It's this extended adolescents, extended dependency on the generation before us, and basically living off other people's work that makes me pretty sick.
In your case, as you said, it's not subsidizing your lifestyle, so I wasn't criticizing you personally.
(I do have a general bias against inherited wealth in general. I'm all about enjoying it in your lifetime and raising kids who can earn their own wealth in theirs!)
so if you earned or inherited a significant amount of money in your lifetime, you would not want your children to benefit from not once you passed away? You would rather the money all go to the government? In your lifetime, you would not want to help your children and grandchildren live in a safer neighborhood or go to better schools? I just can't fathom that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm in my 40's. No, I would never accept financial help from my family. I can support myself. I honestly can't fathom and have SO little respect for the posters above who are adults and who have their parents subsidizing their lifestyles. Gross.
Don't you get the fact that maybe the parents want to give the money? Especially while they are able to see the positive effect it has on their children and grandchildren while they are still alive. My parents are both passed now but it gave them real pleasure to slip me the occasional check for "big birthdays" and anniversaries. And I appreciated the gestures - the money was given and received with more love, and meant more to me, than the funds I got from the lawyers when their estate was wound up after they passed. My parents were at least financially comfortable and there were no strings attached to the gifts. Nor was it a case of subsidizing my lifestyle - more a case of them enjoying seeing and hearing of the results of their generosity. I fully intend to do the same for my children.
Sorry PP if generosity makes you queasy - to some of us it is an expression of thoughtfulness, care and doing the best we can for our loved ones.
PP here. I think there's a big difference between financial help and generous gifts. I said that I had little respect for the PP's above who have parents subsidizing their lifestyles -- like, they could normally only afford to live in a regular middle class house, but they have parents who bought them a 2 million dollar home, or who accept cars, regular rent payments, that sort of thing. The idea of giving and receiving generous gifts occasionally is lovely -- like, grandparents splurging on a big family cruise or something.
I have so many peers who live way above their means because they still expect "help" from their parents every month...and we're in our 40's! It's this extended adolescents, extended dependency on the generation before us, and basically living off other people's work that makes me pretty sick.
In your case, as you said, it's not subsidizing your lifestyle, so I wasn't criticizing you personally.
(I do have a general bias against inherited wealth in general. I'm all about enjoying it in your lifetime and raising kids who can earn their own wealth in theirs!)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm in my 40's. No, I would never accept financial help from my family. I can support myself. I honestly can't fathom and have SO little respect for the posters above who are adults and who have their parents subsidizing their lifestyles. Gross.
Don't you get the fact that maybe the parents want to give the money? Especially while they are able to see the positive effect it has on their children and grandchildren while they are still alive. My parents are both passed now but it gave them real pleasure to slip me the occasional check for "big birthdays" and anniversaries. And I appreciated the gestures - the money was given and received with more love, and meant more to me, than the funds I got from the lawyers when their estate was wound up after they passed. My parents were at least financially comfortable and there were no strings attached to the gifts. Nor was it a case of subsidizing my lifestyle - more a case of them enjoying seeing and hearing of the results of their generosity. I fully intend to do the same for my children.
Sorry PP if generosity makes you queasy - to some of us it is an expression of thoughtfulness, care and doing the best we can for our loved ones.
PP here. I think there's a big difference between financial help and generous gifts. I said that I had little respect for the PP's above who have parents subsidizing their lifestyles -- like, they could normally only afford to live in a regular middle class house, but they have parents who bought them a 2 million dollar home, or who accept cars, regular rent payments, that sort of thing. The idea of giving and receiving generous gifts occasionally is lovely -- like, grandparents splurging on a big family cruise or something.
I have so many peers who live way above their means because they still expect "help" from their parents every month...and we're in our 40's! It's this extended adolescents, extended dependency on the generation before us, and basically living off other people's work that makes me pretty sick.
In your case, as you said, it's not subsidizing your lifestyle, so I wasn't criticizing you personally.
(I do have a general bias against inherited wealth in general. I'm all about enjoying it in your lifetime and raising kids who can earn their own wealth in theirs!)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm in my 40's. No, I would never accept financial help from my family. I can support myself. I honestly can't fathom and have SO little respect for the posters above who are adults and who have their parents subsidizing their lifestyles. Gross.
Don't you get the fact that maybe the parents want to give the money? Especially while they are able to see the positive effect it has on their children and grandchildren while they are still alive. My parents are both passed now but it gave them real pleasure to slip me the occasional check for "big birthdays" and anniversaries. And I appreciated the gestures - the money was given and received with more love, and meant more to me, than the funds I got from the lawyers when their estate was wound up after they passed. My parents were at least financially comfortable and there were no strings attached to the gifts. Nor was it a case of subsidizing my lifestyle - more a case of them enjoying seeing and hearing of the results of their generosity. I fully intend to do the same for my children.
Sorry PP if generosity makes you queasy - to some of us it is an expression of thoughtfulness, care and doing the best we can for our loved ones.