Anonymous wrote:I would not encourage you to look at it this way. Daycare is a household expense, not a mother's expense.
Daycare is a relatively short period in your child's life. If you want to continue working after your child is school age, it is probably better to keep your job. Re-entry can be done, but it's normally not without its challenges.
Anonymous wrote:Work. You will get benefits and build your career and earning potential, and your workplace seniority so that you will have more flexibility later on.
If you still want to SAH, do it after the 2nd baby-- that's much more cost-effective.
Anonymous wrote:I don't get all the posters saying daycare is only short term. Before and After care is still needed once they enter elementary school and they are at least in 5th grade. Plus care is needed in the summers at least thru middle school and all of the school holidays.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a kid, and as an adult, I was always proud of that my mother worked--she started out a secretary worked her way up to a senior management position where she was well-liked and well-respected. She made peanuts when we were little and probably barely broke even, esp. when all three of us were in daycare--I think she mostly worked back then for the health benefits, since my father was self-employed. I have never, as a kid (that I can remember) or as an adult thought: "I wish I had had a SAHM." Some people feel differently, I know, but I think it's a false premise that being home with your kids is inherently more valuable (to you or to them) than working. It's all about individual circumstances and preferences, and no one should judge others who feel differently.
^^apologies for typos
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To think long-term.
+1
Now that kids are in school my salary, which is higher because of raises and promotions, is a great addition to the family budget. And I have a healthy TSP growing.
Instead of thinking of daycare coming out of mom's salary, why not think of it as a family expense from the overall budget including dad's salary?
NP. Because it's a cost that only exists with both parents working. For accounting purposes, it comes out of the salary of whoever would be the one to stay home. It's just basic economics, no reason to make it a feminist stand.
NP. You are missing the point and the one trying to make it a feminist issue. It is an economic issue, and a family economic issue. Whole family benefits from mom's retirement contributions, salary, social security contributions, benefits, and ability to stay in the workforce. Stats show women (and therefore their families) never regain the lost income from taking more than a few years off.
Anonymous wrote:Do you really want to be away from your children for 40-50 hours per week and do the "commute, drop off, pickup, quick make dinner, bed bath rush in a couple hours before bedtime" scramble for 401 k funding?
I wouldn't be able to make it through the day knowing I was spending that time away from my kids for so little.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To think long-term.
+1
Now that kids are in school my salary, which is higher because of raises and promotions, is a great addition to the family budget. And I have a healthy TSP growing.
Instead of thinking of daycare coming out of mom's salary, why not think of it as a family expense from the overall budget including dad's salary?
NP. Because it's a cost that only exists with both parents working. For accounting purposes, it comes out of the salary of whoever would be the one to stay home. It's just basic economics, no reason to make it a feminist stand.
Anonymous wrote:As a kid, and as an adult, I was always proud of that my mother worked--she started out a secretary worked her way up to a senior management position where she was well-liked and well-respected. She made peanuts when we were little and probably barely broke even, esp. when all three of us were in daycare--I think she mostly worked back then for the health benefits, since my father was self-employed. I have never, as a kid (that I can remember) or as an adult thought: "I wish I had had a SAHM." Some people feel differently, I know, but I think it's a false premise that being home with your kids is inherently more valuable (to you or to them) than working. It's all about individual circumstances and preferences, and no one should judge others who feel differently.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you really want to be away from your children for 40-50 hours per week and do the "commute, drop off, pickup, quick make dinner, bed bath rush in a couple hours before bedtime" scramble for 401 k funding?
I wouldn't be able to make it through the day knowing I was spending that time away from my kids for so little.
To each her own. I wouldn't be able to sleep at night knowing that we weren't saving for college, retirement, etc. And it would have been an enormous amount of stress for my husband, as well, being the sole support for the family.