Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MS is so much harder than people here seem to think. It's why schools with much more than CM fail, and why so many in DC who can go private choose to.
It's a little tired hearing people say "we could afford to go private, but choose not to". Really? You're so wealthy you can spend an extra $25K per ano, and yet you're betting on a completely unproven idea with a very low potential for success ?
Shenanigans.
You must not know much about the CMI community. We could also easily afford to go private but chose CMI because of the amazing education out child is receiving. We are betting on a known administration and community. Sounds like a safe bet to me.
Actually, I do know some CM families, in more than one grade. They are happy enough, but don't pretend it's anything close to a private school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MS is so much harder than people here seem to think. It's why schools with much more than CM fail, and why so many in DC who can go private choose to.
It's a little tired hearing people say "we could afford to go private, but choose not to". Really? You're so wealthy you can spend an extra $25K per ano, and yet you're betting on a completely unproven idea with a very low potential for success ?
Shenanigans.
You must not know much about the CMI community. We could also easily afford to go private but chose CMI because of the amazing education out child is receiving. We are betting on a known administration and community. Sounds like a safe bet to me.
Anonymous wrote:My kid is in a lower grade at CMI. I just toured a private school k-12 program and focused specifically on their middle school to get an idea of what would be available to me at this private that I like vs the planned CMI middle. I was pleasantly surprised to find that CMI has EVERYTHING this private had and more, with the Chinese language instruction and sensory stuff. All CMI needs to add for middle school is a science lab but nothing fancy as it is only middle school and an arts room to do ceramics and clay modeling. They have the space so this will be easy. As for the competition sports this is lacking but. Can be developed. I went to a k-8 school and it was fine. I also appreciated the diversity At CMI that you can't get at any area private. The fact is that CMI model has never been done in DC in a K-8 public model so really there is nothing upon which to base predictions. There are no schools that are public,for instance, which small class sizes like CMI so people are comparing apples to oranges.
Anonymous wrote:MS is so much harder than people here seem to think. It's why schools with much more than CM fail, and why so many in DC who can go private choose to.
It's a little tired hearing people say "we could afford to go private, but choose not to". Really? You're so wealthy you can spend an extra $25K per ano, and yet you're betting on a completely unproven idea with a very low potential for success ?
Shenanigans.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is in a lower grade at CMI. I just toured a private school k-12 program and focused specifically on their middle school to get an idea of what would be available to me at this private that I like vs the planned CMI middle. I was pleasantly surprised to find that CMI has EVERYTHING this private had and more, with the Chinese language instruction and sensory stuff. All CMI needs to add for middle school is a science lab but nothing fancy as it is only middle school and an arts room to do ceramics and clay modeling. They have the space so this will be easy. As for the competition sports this is lacking but. Can be developed. I went to a k-8 school and it was fine. I also appreciated the diversity At CMI that you can't get at any area private. The fact is that CMI model has never been done in DC in a K-8 public model so really there is nothing upon which to base predictions. There are no schools that are public,for instance, which small class sizes like CMI so people are comparing apples to oranges.
What continues to be hopelessly naive here, is the notion that you can transplant the model of a successful private without significant retooling for a public. Privates have multiple barriers to entry (mainly in the form of high-WISC scores and of course $$). That means they can sort out anyone they don't want, for any reason: academic readiness, behavior and demeanor, attitude, and of course financial wherewithal, which generally means highly motivated parents and families. They can also ask students to leave at any time. Trouble learning? Leave. Problem in class? Leave. Etc.
CM will not have that option. It will have to take all comers, and barring anything criminal, will have to keep them. Disrupt the class? Too bad class, we have to accommodate the misbehavior. Slow learner? Too bad class, we have to slow down the level of instruction. Student needs extra resources? Too bad class, we have to take away potential money from your potential science lab to spend it on specialized resources for specialized needs.
It will have to open the floodgates, and the students who pour in will not be coming from the same academic background. It will not have the economies of scale to be all schools to all people. I'm no fan of Deal myself, but it certainly has that going for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is in a lower grade at CMI. I just toured a private school k-12 program and focused specifically on their middle school to get an idea of what would be available to me at this private that I like vs the planned CMI middle. I was pleasantly surprised to find that CMI has EVERYTHING this private had and more, with the Chinese language instruction and sensory stuff. All CMI needs to add for middle school is a science lab but nothing fancy as it is only middle school and an arts room to do ceramics and clay modeling. They have the space so this will be easy. As for the competition sports this is lacking but. Can be developed. I went to a k-8 school and it was fine. I also appreciated the diversity At CMI that you can't get at any area private. The fact is that CMI model has never been done in DC in a K-8 public model so really there is nothing upon which to base predictions. There are no schools that are public,for instance, which small class sizes like CMI so people are comparing apples to oranges.
What continues to be hopelessly naive here, is the notion that you can transplant the model of a successful private without significant retooling for a public. Privates have multiple barriers to entry (mainly in the form of high-WISC scores and of course $$). That means they can sort out anyone they don't want, for any reason: academic readiness, behavior and demeanor, attitude, and of course financial wherewithal, which generally means highly motivated parents and families. They can also ask students to leave at any time. Trouble learning? Leave. Problem in class? Leave. Etc.
CM will not have that option. It will have to take all comers, and barring anything criminal, will have to keep them. Disrupt the class? Too bad class, we have to accommodate the misbehavior. Slow learner? Too bad class, we have to slow down the level of instruction. Student needs extra resources? Too bad class, we have to take away potential money from your potential science lab to spend it on specialized resources for specialized needs.
It will have to open the floodgates, and the students who pour in will not be coming from the same academic background. It will not have the economies of scale to be all schools to all people. I'm no fan of Deal myself, but it certainly has that going for it.
Anonymous wrote:NP...because their DC is probably still in ES.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is in a lower grade at CMI. I just toured a private school k-12 program and focused specifically on their middle school to get an idea of what would be available to me at this private that I like vs the planned CMI middle. I was pleasantly surprised to find that CMI has EVERYTHING this private had and more, with the Chinese language instruction and sensory stuff. All CMI needs to add for middle school is a science lab but nothing fancy as it is only middle school and an arts room to do ceramics and clay modeling. They have the space so this will be easy. As for the competition sports this is lacking but. Can be developed. I went to a k-8 school and it was fine. I also appreciated the diversity At CMI that you can't get at any area private. The fact is that CMI model has never been done in DC in a K-8 public model so really there is nothing upon which to base predictions. There are no schools that are public,for instance, which small class sizes like CMI so people are comparing apples to oranges.
What continues to be hopelessly naive here, is the notion that you can transplant the model of a successful private without significant retooling for a public. Privates have multiple barriers to entry (mainly in the form of high-WISC scores and of course $$). That means they can sort out anyone they don't want, for any reason: academic readiness, behavior and demeanor, attitude, and of course financial wherewithal, which generally means highly motivated parents and families. They can also ask students to leave at any time. Trouble learning? Leave. Problem in class? Leave. Etc.
CM will not have that option. It will have to take all comers, and barring anything criminal, will have to keep them. Disrupt the class? Too bad class, we have to accommodate the misbehavior. Slow learner? Too bad class, we have to slow down the level of instruction. Student needs extra resources? Too bad class, we have to take away potential money from your potential science lab to spend it on specialized resources for specialized needs.
It will have to open the floodgates, and the students who pour in will not be coming from the same academic background. It will not have the economies of scale to be all schools to all people. I'm no fan of Deal myself, but it certainly has that going for it.
Anonymous wrote:My kid is in a lower grade at CMI. I just toured a private school k-12 program and focused specifically on their middle school to get an idea of what would be available to me at this private that I like vs the planned CMI middle. I was pleasantly surprised to find that CMI has EVERYTHING this private had and more, with the Chinese language instruction and sensory stuff. All CMI needs to add for middle school is a science lab but nothing fancy as it is only middle school and an arts room to do ceramics and clay modeling. They have the space so this will be easy. As for the competition sports this is lacking but. Can be developed. I went to a k-8 school and it was fine. I also appreciated the diversity At CMI that you can't get at any area private. The fact is that CMI model has never been done in DC in a K-8 public model so really there is nothing upon which to base predictions. There are no schools that are public,for instance, which small class sizes like CMI so people are comparing apples to oranges.