Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can relate with the story 9:10 related. Although my DS isn't aggressive, he was in an FCPS special ed preschool starting at age 3. We wanted him held back from K to spend an additional year in the preschool and were informed by the school that his needs would be met through his IEP and he couldn't be held back. Even our high priced, highly regarded advocate ($250/hr) said there was nothing she could do. FCPS had to follow the mandated process. K was an absolute disaster for DS. We were able to mitigate some of issues by documenting immediately reactions and our suggestions as well as providing the $3.5K private evaluations we had done. As 9:10 said, it was a clusterfuck for everyone until we could get DS out of the mainstreamed classroom.
It sounds like FCPS has a one size fits all process where dc from the special ed preschools are put right into general ed kindergartens. This doesn't really make sense to me-at least some of the kids who needed a special ed preschool are not going to do well in the regular K classes (or they wouldn't have needed a special ed preschool in the first place).
Anonymous wrote:Of course we realize that. That is why we said they need to get the kid on the list immediately for intervention.Anonymous wrote:Are you all realize the school can't just decide to put a child in a special Ed classroom? That requires a diagnosis or classification of special needs which requires an evaluation that his parents would have to consent to. If the parents feel there's no issue or aren't interested in a self contained class, the school has its hands tied.
Anonymous wrote:No one said they child needed to be forced, however the child obviously has an imbalance and needs to be medicated. If the parents agree to medicate the child then the child can stay in a mainstream classroom if the violent behavior stops. However, the other children should not be in danger of being pummeled by a desk or chair because of one parent's rights to refuse medication.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Complain to the principal and superintendent daily. The child needs to be high priority for SPED. Either in a self-contained classroom or on medication to control the impulse behavior. No child, parent, or teacher should be held hostage by a 5 year old. Speak up and speak loudly.Anonymous wrote:Since the start of school this child has been out of control to the point the other students in the class don't feel safe (frequently hits, pushes kids, draws blood, leaves marks, attackes with scissors and other objects, throws chairs, hits teacher, etc). The school's solution is to put another adult in the room to help protect the kids. At what point does the safety of the other 22 kids take priority over this child? As parents how can we assure are kids aren't afraid of going to school and getting hurt? How do we get the school to address this problem before a child is seriously hurt? It breaks my heart to see my 5 yr so terrified to go to school because the school is allowing this child to stay in the classroom.
The schools can't force parents to medicate their child.
Of course we realize that. That is why we said they need to get the kid on the list immediately for intervention.Anonymous wrote:Are you all realize the school can't just decide to put a child in a special Ed classroom? That requires a diagnosis or classification of special needs which requires an evaluation that his parents would have to consent to. If the parents feel there's no issue or aren't interested in a self contained class, the school has its hands tied.
Anonymous wrote:Are you all realize the school can't just decide to put a child in a special Ed classroom? That requires a diagnosis or classification of special needs which requires an evaluation that his parents would have to consent to. If the parents feel there's no issue or aren't interested in a self contained class, the school has its hands tied.
Anonymous wrote:I can relate with the story 9:10 related. Although my DS isn't aggressive, he was in an FCPS special ed preschool starting at age 3. We wanted him held back from K to spend an additional year in the preschool and were informed by the school that his needs would be met through his IEP and he couldn't be held back. Even our high priced, highly regarded advocate ($250/hr) said there was nothing she could do. FCPS had to follow the mandated process. K was an absolute disaster for DS. We were able to mitigate some of issues by documenting immediately reactions and our suggestions as well as providing the $3.5K private evaluations we had done. As 9:10 said, it was a clusterfuck for everyone until we could get DS out of the mainstreamed classroom.
Anonymous wrote:Are you all realize the school can't just decide to put a child in a special Ed classroom? That requires a diagnosis or classification of special needs which requires an evaluation that his parents would have to consent to. If the parents feel there's no issue or aren't interested in a self contained class, the school has its hands tied.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Pay for private, OP. Everyone is legally entitled to free access to education, no matter how much you don't like them.
No parent bashing. The parent has legitimate concerns about their child's safety in the classroom. First talk with teacher about concerns. Then talk with principal about concerns. Start there and see, what their response is. If you are still not satisfied, take it up the chain of command to head of schools, super, etc. Children should feel safe in classroom.
I'm not "parent bashing;" otherwise I'd have made fun of her precious "snowflake."
FAPE is the law: http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/edlite-FAPE504.html
Children should feel safe in the classroom, but it's not a legal requirement. Allowing a kid access to an education is.
I would put in an email asking for my child to be moved because of concern for her physical safety and copy the person above the principal. When things get put in writing, they will figure out a solution to avoid potential liability for inaction in the event something happens and there's a lawsuit.
No one said they child needed to be forced, however the child obviously has an imbalance and needs to be medicated. If the parents agree to medicate the child then the child can stay in a mainstream classroom if the violent behavior stops. However, the other children should not be in danger of being pummeled by a desk or chair because of one parent's rights to refuse medication.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Complain to the principal and superintendent daily. The child needs to be high priority for SPED. Either in a self-contained classroom or on medication to control the impulse behavior. No child, parent, or teacher should be held hostage by a 5 year old. Speak up and speak loudly.Anonymous wrote:Since the start of school this child has been out of control to the point the other students in the class don't feel safe (frequently hits, pushes kids, draws blood, leaves marks, attackes with scissors and other objects, throws chairs, hits teacher, etc). The school's solution is to put another adult in the room to help protect the kids. At what point does the safety of the other 22 kids take priority over this child? As parents how can we assure are kids aren't afraid of going to school and getting hurt? How do we get the school to address this problem before a child is seriously hurt? It breaks my heart to see my 5 yr so terrified to go to school because the school is allowing this child to stay in the classroom.
The schools can't force parents to medicate their child.
Anonymous wrote:Complain to the principal and superintendent daily. The child needs to be high priority for SPED. Either in a self-contained classroom or on medication to control the impulse behavior. No child, parent, or teacher should be held hostage by a 5 year old. Speak up and speak loudly.Anonymous wrote:Since the start of school this child has been out of control to the point the other students in the class don't feel safe (frequently hits, pushes kids, draws blood, leaves marks, attackes with scissors and other objects, throws chairs, hits teacher, etc). The school's solution is to put another adult in the room to help protect the kids. At what point does the safety of the other 22 kids take priority over this child? As parents how can we assure are kids aren't afraid of going to school and getting hurt? How do we get the school to address this problem before a child is seriously hurt? It breaks my heart to see my 5 yr so terrified to go to school because the school is allowing this child to stay in the classroom.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much more expensive it is to put a kid in a small special ed type classroom. That seems like a lot of misery to put everyone through just to try and save some money.
I would think the smaller special ed classroom woukd be cheaper than mainstreaming them and paying for a one on one aide to shadow them.
Makes me wonder if they insist upon this (one on one aide) because they have been sued in the past or had an OCR complaint because a parent wanted their kid mainstreamed with and aide instead of in a small self contained class.
It seems odd that a district would push for the more expensive option (one on one aide/mainstreamed) over the cheaper more logical option (self contained class with a 2:1 to 4:1 student staff ratio).
Anonymous wrote:I wonder how much more expensive it is to put a kid in a small special ed type classroom. That seems like a lot of misery to put everyone through just to try and save some money.