Anonymous wrote:As irony would have it, a 3.5 with either a legacy (assuming moola donation per diems met) or a sports recruiting preference has it all over the 4.0 with no bump. Sidwell is a strong private school, but there are many others like that. It's delusional to think that an Ivy or a NECSAC takes kids from any elite private these days.
More and more it is about where you get a graduate degree in most desired professions, so going to any decent college and again getting great grades matters more than just getting a boost to attend Duke or an Ivy. My son has private lessons from a Dartmouth graduate who is unemployed and living with his parents. Success in life is hard earned and requires a pattern of success and achievement at every step.
A kid with a 3.5 at Sidwell is a great kid with a great future, but how great is up to him / her regardless of where the kid attends undergrad. Remember, a 3.8 at Kenyon is likely to find a decent first job or gain entrance to a fine grad school. A 2.6 in sociology at Duke = giving back yard lacrosse lessons to kids at $75 in cash paid by a loser like me who went to Chico State but started and sold a company for over $100 mil. I love the "where did you go to college" thing at coctail parties. It suits my asshole nature so well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As irony would have it, a 3.5 with either a legacy (assuming moola donation per diems met) or a sports recruiting preference has it all over the 4.0 with no bump. Sidwell is a strong private school, but there are many others like that. It's delusional to think that an Ivy or a NECSAC takes kids from any elite private these days.
More and more it is about where you get a graduate degree in most desired professions, so going to any decent college and again getting great grades matters more than just getting a boost to attend Duke or an Ivy. My son has private lessons from a Dartmouth graduate who is unemployed and living with his parents. Success in life is hard earned and requires a pattern of success and achievement at every step.
A kid with a 3.5 at Sidwell is a great kid with a great future, but how great is up to him / her regardless of where the kid attends undergrad. Remember, a 3.8 at Kenyon is likely to find a decent first job or gain entrance to a fine grad school. A 2.6 in sociology at Duke = giving back yard lacrosse lessons to kids at $75 in cash paid by a loser like me who went to Chico State but started and sold a company for over $100 mil. I love the "where did you go to college" thing at coctail parties. It suits my asshole nature so well.
I agree with you that personal qualities are the ultimate determinant, but I cannot go back in time and alter my kid even if I wanted to. But I can perhaps help him on a slightly better path.
Also, not sure that your unemployed Dartmouth graduate living with his parents is the right comparison. You need to hold the kid fixed and compare schools, not pick different kids from different schools. Given that your son was unemployed and living in the basement is he more likely to land on his feet eventually with a Dartmouth degree or with one from, say, to pick a good state school, Ohio State? Also, given 6-year completion rates at Dartmouth and state schools. maybe the kid would still not have graduated.
And if you had gone to Harvard, rather than Chico State, maybe you would be looking at billions, not $100m. No easy calls.
Anonymous wrote:As irony would have it, a 3.5 with either a legacy (assuming moola donation per diems met) or a sports recruiting preference has it all over the 4.0 with no bump. Sidwell is a strong private school, but there are many others like that. It's delusional to think that an Ivy or a NECSAC takes kids from any elite private these days.
More and more it is about where you get a graduate degree in most desired professions, so going to any decent college and again getting great grades matters more than just getting a boost to attend Duke or an Ivy. My son has private lessons from a Dartmouth graduate who is unemployed and living with his parents. Success in life is hard earned and requires a pattern of success and achievement at every step.
A kid with a 3.5 at Sidwell is a great kid with a great future, but how great is up to him / her regardless of where the kid attends undergrad. Remember, a 3.8 at Kenyon is likely to find a decent first job or gain entrance to a fine grad school. A 2.6 in sociology at Duke = giving back yard lacrosse lessons to kids at $75 in cash paid by a loser like me who went to Chico State but started and sold a company for over $100 mil. I love the "where did you go to college" thing at coctail parties. It suits my asshole nature so well.
Anonymous wrote:Yale likes Sidwell and usually takes 5-6. Last year it was 14. Other Ivies usually take 1-4.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Swarthmore, Middlebury, Tufts, Davidson, Vandy, Pomona, etc.
Swarthmore, Middlebury, and Pomona are almost as tough as Ivies. The 3.5 Sidwell student would have a shot if everything else in the package was strong, but no guarantees. Washington University would also fit into this category. Duke is also a little easier than the Ivies. I think the counselors would say that 3.5 students should target schools that accept 10-15% of applicants, not the one that accept 5%. There are exceptions though, because some kids have connections or hooks and some are just really interesting.
Anonymous wrote:Swarthmore, Middlebury, Tufts, Davidson, Vandy, Pomona, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Sidwell? Probably some ultra liberal, Northern crap school where they can take courses on "Dreams" for $80k a year
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Someone with a 3.5 is unlikely to be the best a teacher has seen in 10 years. And teacher recs aren't "profoundly influential" anywhere. Nice to have good ones, and certainly a factor, but hardly profound.
The big land grant colleges rely primarily on GPA and test scores, but the elite schools all read each application and teacher recommendations are incredibly important. Among a pool of very talented students, they are often decisive. This is particularly true for high schools that send a lot of students to elite schools and the admissions officers know that the teachers have a strong understanding of the students. And a great many admits are students who are particularly accomplished in one field/endeavor rather than the classic well rounded stereotype. So it is unusual for Harvard to admit a student with a very strong academic record in English/literature from an exceptional high school English program with Bs in calculus BC and AP physics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you look at Sidwell's policies and procedures (as set forth under it bylaws), it says the following:
"...in the instance where a student at SFS has earned a grade point average no higher than 3.53 and no lower than a 3.50 at the time of graduation, such student shall be required to matriculate to Kenyon College."
Very funny. But this has been amended to include Michigan.
Anonymous wrote:
College of Charleston
Please....