Again, don't blame hipsters. They didn't start the dogwalking program. It's inaccurate and unfair to blame them.Anonymous wrote:So because laws weren't enforced and drug dealers and prostitutes were there, it is OK so show no common respect for a cemetery?
How about spending time not looking the other way at crime, not accepting it, rather than following one bad deed with another.
If somebody was watching a movie or letting their dog shit on my grandfather's grave, I would be insanely bitter. More Hipster bullshit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While I think its weird to watch a movie, I am all for open access to cemeterys. they are horrible land use in the grand scheme of things. Huge swaths of property shut off from everything in perpituity. Creamation is the environomentally appropriate choice.
+1
I prefer the scacred forest idea, where trees are planted over the bodies. Dogs and families are welcome to use the forest like a national park.
So Aunt Elga's spirit can grow into the tree branches and blow with the wind? No, thank you. That sounds like a scary forest, not a sacred one.
Huh? If Aunt Elga's spirit can grow into tree branches, can it just as easily grow into the grass and blow into the wind? Or is a casket requires to keep the spirit with the body? Of course that means the spirit had to stay with the body after death and burial.
You've certainly opened Pandora's box (or at very least Aunt Elga's) with regards to death and spirits.
Anonymous wrote:The dogwalking community at Congressional is very, very careful to leave the gravesites clean. I think you even have to be a member to be able to walk your dog there, and there is a huge waiting list. Regardless of what people on DCUM think, I believe that the overwhelming community feeling is that the cemetery is cleaner and safer than it has been in decades.
It would be interesting to hear from more families who have loved ones buried there, but I can't imagine that the historic preservation group is allowing activities on the site without buy-in from a significant majority of stakeholders.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While I think its weird to watch a movie, I am all for open access to cemeterys. they are horrible land use in the grand scheme of things. Huge swaths of property shut off from everything in perpituity. Creamation is the environomentally appropriate choice.
+1
I prefer the scacred forest idea, where trees are planted over the bodies. Dogs and families are welcome to use the forest like a national park.
So Aunt Elga's spirit can grow into the tree branches and blow with the wind? No, thank you. That sounds like a scary forest, not a sacred one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:While I think its weird to watch a movie, I am all for open access to cemeterys. they are horrible land use in the grand scheme of things. Huge swaths of property shut off from everything in perpituity. Creamation is the environomentally appropriate choice.
+1
I prefer the scacred forest idea, where trees are planted over the bodies. Dogs and families are welcome to use the forest like a national park.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where I am from - it's common practice to pay respect to the dead by camping out at their graves and having parties. No joke - we would have buffets and people would drink alcohol.
I'm okay with this cemetery being used by people to watch movies and walk their dogs. Better to have good people there than have it be empty of frequented by criminals.
You naysayers - if you have an issue with it- take it up with the cemetery. If you are not a stake holder - then shut the hell up.
The hipsters watching ironic movies on the graves of people they don't know aren't exactly stakeholders. And the locals letting their dogs take a dump every day on the graves of people they don't know are only marginally "stakeholders" -- and they could enjoy that same level of "stakeholding" by making a simple cash donation to the non-profit while skipping the dogs purposefully shitting on graves aspect.
And no, I won't shut the hell up. Sometimes it's better to voice objection to things that are just wrong. Like perhaps I decry bigotry and racism against Mexicans who observe pagan rituals that may be known as Dia do los Muertos -- even though I'm not Latin American and so have "hold" no "stake" in that exercise.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a DC native and l'm old enough to remember when drug dealers used to camp out in front of AND IN Congressional Cemetery, dealing and using.
Prostitutes roamed it openly.
Comparatively, watching movies is a vast improvement.
Grow up![/quote]
You had me until "grow up". That makes no sense.
Anonymous wrote:While I think its weird to watch a movie, I am all for open access to cemeterys. they are horrible land use in the grand scheme of things. Huge swaths of property shut off from everything in perpituity. Creamation is the environomentally appropriate choice.
Anonymous wrote:
The hipsters watching ironic movies on the graves of people they don't know aren't exactly stakeholders. And the locals letting their dogs take a dump every day on the graves of people they don't know are only marginally "stakeholders" -- and they could enjoy that same level of "stakeholding" by making a simple cash donation to the non-profit while skipping the dogs purposefully shitting on graves aspect.
And no, I won't shut the hell up. Sometimes it's better to voice objection to things that are just wrong. Like perhaps I decry bigotry and racism against Mexicans who observe pagan rituals that may be known as Dia do los Muertos -- even though I'm not Latin American and so have "hold" no "stake" in that exercise.