Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What did you think when you heard "the school values all kind of learners"? Is that code for kids with learning disabilities are welcomed? Is it your first year at the school. What are the other advanced kids doing?
We are many years into this school (DC#1 attended a different independent). What did I think? I thought "all kinds of learners" meant a variety of learners within a range, and also meant that the school would strive to impart information using methods preferred by kids who are visual, auditory or kinesthetic-dominant. I guess I didn't think they meant it literally -- "all" learners.
The visual/auditory/kinesthetic learning-style thing has been discredited, so teaching this way would actually be a non-best practice at this point.
Uh what? This is still being taught in Graduate programs as recently as 3 years ago, particularly for students with learning disabilities
Anonymous wrote:What grade does the school start separating kids into the slower class and and the more advanced class? If next year your child will be in the smarter class and will go at a more appropriate pace for math and science, then I would probably stick with the current school. If the class size is small and the kids won't be separated based on abilities, then I would find another school. No reason to pay so much money if your child will be hindered by slow children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What did you think when you heard "the school values all kind of learners"? Is that code for kids with learning disabilities are welcomed? Is it your first year at the school. What are the other advanced kids doing?
We are many years into this school (DC#1 attended a different independent). What did I think? I thought "all kinds of learners" meant a variety of learners within a range, and also meant that the school would strive to impart information using methods preferred by kids who are visual, auditory or kinesthetic-dominant. I guess I didn't think they meant it literally -- "all" learners.
The visual/auditory/kinesthetic learning-style thing has been discredited, so teaching this way would actually be a non-best practice at this point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What did you think when you heard "the school values all kind of learners"? Is that code for kids with learning disabilities are welcomed? Is it your first year at the school. What are the other advanced kids doing?
We are many years into this school (DC#1 attended a different independent). What did I think? I thought "all kinds of learners" meant a variety of learners within a range, and also meant that the school would strive to impart information using methods preferred by kids who are visual, auditory or kinesthetic-dominant. I guess I didn't think they meant it literally -- "all" learners.
The visual/auditory/kinesthetic learning-style thing has been discredited, so teaching this way would actually be a non-best practice at this point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What did you think when you heard "the school values all kind of learners"? Is that code for kids with learning disabilities are welcomed? Is it your first year at the school. What are the other advanced kids doing?
We are many years into this school (DC#1 attended a different independent). What did I think? I thought "all kinds of learners" meant a variety of learners within a range, and also meant that the school would strive to impart information using methods preferred by kids who are visual, auditory or kinesthetic-dominant. I guess I didn't think they meant it literally -- "all" learners.
Anonymous wrote:If this was occasional, DC (and I) would feel differently but it's constant and shows no end in sight. I think this is the new normal for 80% of DC's classes (save for art, PE and "French").
Why is "French" in quotes?
They're actually teaching Romansch, but they call it "French".
(I am not the OP.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Sounds like good teaching practices to me. Kudos to the teacher for making sure that he or she is reaching all learners!Anonymous wrote:I thought I was a compassionate, inclusive typical DC liberal, but I guess I'm not, in the privacy of my own thoughts. I am, frankly, irritated to learn that instruction slows way, way down every single lesson to accommodate the two kids in DS's grade who need extra supports.
If this was occasional, DC (and I) would feel differently but it's constant and shows no end in sight. I think this is the new normal for 80% of DC's classes (save for art, PE and "French"). DS attends an independent school, which is not mandated by IDEA to provide an 'appropriate education' to students with learning challenges. The school values all kinds of learners. This sounded really sweet and noble to me on paper, and it still does conceptually, but it's frustrating in practice.
I say all the right things to DC about inclusiveness and compassion but I'd be lying if I said I'm thrilled to be paying $35,000 a year so the entire class can move at the slowest common denominator pace necessitated by these students.
*The supports amount to the teacher(s) repeating themselves multiple times, restating the idea, waiting until one student processes the information and signals as much. The other student requires that the lesson stop every few minutes, literally (I've seen it) while the teacher(s) reorient the student. Then the teacher(s) must rewind and repeat the last few sentences before adding new information.
+1
I'm a teacher. These are "best practices". How do you know that she's only doing this for the two kids with SN. There are likely other kids who also benefit from repetition and rephrasing.
Im a special education teacher and while this is commonly stated as best practices, it's not best practice. Differentiated learning should look quite different than direct instruction until everyone understands.