Anonymous wrote:Why do kids in MoCo get into better schools in disproportionate numbers compared to the majority of other schools systems? It's not the grades. It's the reputation of high quality teaching and high, consistent standards. Parents of younger children should be watching this situation very intently because the existing reputation will only carry for so long. Lack of academic discipline and consistency will translate very directly to the AP courses. The kids who are very bright will continue to to well and the next tier down will not be able to keep up like they do now. Scores will plummet. Interestingly, it will happen in conjunction with the score corrections that are happening so it will be a double whammy.
Anonymous wrote:
Yes!!! Elementary teacher here and parents need to know that we are just fed up with this! We have little to no say in what or even how we teach your kids. It's become so disheartening. It will. It change until PARENTS demand it though. Give teachers back the right to teach as they see fit for their students.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I thought the central office curriculum crew were crazy when they switched from a-e grading to the es,p,i,n for elementary school, now getting rid of high school finals I know they are crazy. Also, an granular level some of the material distributed under C 2.0 is poor too. It's not the teachers its the curriculum office on a county wide basis that needs improvement.
Exactly! The central office folks pretend to listen to teachers, but they really don't. Teachers were very much against this because teachers know the students need to learn how to take a cumulative test on material they have learned in class. They will have to do this in college, if they go. If they choose to go into the military or pursue a trade or some other career, the discipline of studying for a final exams will serve them well.
This decision is all about trying to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. The 2.0 Curriculum SUCKS! The elementary grading system is a joke because the range of what is considered "proficient " is so broad as to be meaningless. The people making the decisions are CLUELESS about what classrooms need and they disregard what teachers say they want.
I'm SO tired of MCPS administrators. Year after year they make it more difficult to teach kids. Please HELP us teachers by CONTACTING THE BOARD to object to this ridiculous decision.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well when 3/4 of the students are failing the exam, why bother fixing the problem when you can just get ride of them and still gloat you have this "great" school district. Problem solved!!
If you actually read the article you will see that the pass rates in real math classes are reasonably high (75% range for honors alg 2 for example). The kids taking algebra 1 in high school are remedial math students, in some cases severely so. It's commendable that 25% actually pass the exams.
Anonymous wrote:Why do kids in MoCo get into better schools in disproportionate numbers compared to the majority of other schools systems? It's not the grades. It's the reputation of high quality teaching and high, consistent standards. Parents of younger children should be watching this situation very intently because the existing reputation will only carry for so long. Lack of academic discipline and consistency will translate very directly to the AP courses. The kids who are very bright will continue to to well and the next tier down will not be able to keep up like they do now. Scores will plummet. Interestingly, it will happen in conjunction with the score corrections that are happening so it will be a double whammy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But how many colleges will be excited to here about a school system that measures the cumulative knowledge of calculus or physics or chemistry through a "project"?
MCPS is not getting rid of final exams. MCPS is getting rid of the two-hour exam periods at the end of the semester. There will still be tests, in addition to projects etc. (or "projects", as you call them).
I don't know how many school systems in the country don't have two-hour final exam periods, but I'm guessing that there are far more school systems that don't have two-hour final exam periods than that do.
And the teachers can decide on their own who passes and fails those things. It doesn't show how the teachers are actually teaching these kids with the curriculum
Anonymous wrote:Well when 3/4 of the students are failing the exam, why bother fixing the problem when you can just get ride of them and still gloat you have this "great" school district. Problem solved!!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But how many colleges will be excited to here about a school system that measures the cumulative knowledge of calculus or physics or chemistry through a "project"?
MCPS is not getting rid of final exams. MCPS is getting rid of the two-hour exam periods at the end of the semester. There will still be tests, in addition to projects etc. (or "projects", as you call them).
I don't know how many school systems in the country don't have two-hour final exam periods, but I'm guessing that there are far more school systems that don't have two-hour final exam periods than that do.
Anonymous wrote:And so it continues. The schools with great teachers will develop great assessments that truly measure learning that is well aligned. The less supported teachers, ones with less experience, and the ones in schools where they are just hanging on for dear life are not going to have exams, or the ones they have will not be very good.
And to answer 6:54- if MCPS does away with exam grading and exam timing, in essence they are getting rid of exams. Stating that they will instead be doing regular projects, portfolios or other measures is a slap in the face to teachers who teach higher level kids who need background knowledge mastery.
Anonymous wrote:But how many colleges will be excited to here about a school system that measures the cumulative knowledge of calculus or physics or chemistry through a "project"?