Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All if you "it is what it is" people are complicit to injustice, violence and murder.

How do you sleep at night?

If you aren't part of the solution, you're part of the problem.


This white suburban mom says: Black Lives Matter!

This white suburban man says you are naive and ignorant
This white man has come across lots of colored thugs that get away with crimes instead of being locked up. You know nothing about what you think is going on. You are part of the problem. The WSOP that are enablers to the thugs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just want to say that I'm a white person who recognizes this as a real, unjust, dangerous and deadly reality. I will do whatever I can to help change it. It is a shameful practice, and I am ashamed and saddened by it.

It's hard to quantify. The Rand Corporation did a study covering an area that got a lot of complaints about racial profiling in traffic stops.

https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/reprints/2007/RAND_RP1253.pdf

The study covered the proportion of people pulled over during the day (when police could conceivably see the race of the driver) through dusk and at night. No profiling was found. Indeed, an interesting observation from the paper:

"The first column of Table 1 presents the fraction of blacks among drivers stopped in the full sample. Among drivers stopped during daylight, 49% were black; among drivers stopped when it was dark, 65% were black. Under the restrictive conditions discussed in Section 4.1, we can test for racial profiling by comparing these two numbers. If anything, this comparison suggests “reverse” racial profiling, because it shows that non-black drivers are disproportionately stopped during daylight when visibility is high. "

Where is the above paragraph found in that rand link?

did a word find and it doesn't come up

Not pp.
Page 884 toward the bottom of the first column of text.

Anonymous wrote:It also happens to blacks in wealthy places like Beverly Hills. I follow one of the Micheal Jackson relatives on twitter and she a Harvard graduate tweeted about a DWB incident that happened to her. It didn't only go further because he ended up guessing that she was indeed a member of the Jackson clan. Otherwise he couldn't believe that black female Harvard graduate or not could afford such a nice ride

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just want to say that I'm a white person who recognizes this as a real, unjust, dangerous and deadly reality. I will do whatever I can to help change it. It is a shameful practice, and I am ashamed and saddened by it.

It's hard to quantify. The Rand Corporation did a study covering an area that got a lot of complaints about racial profiling in traffic stops.

https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/reprints/2007/RAND_RP1253.pdf

The study covered the proportion of people pulled over during the day (when police could conceivably see the race of the driver) through dusk and at night. No profiling was found. Indeed, an interesting observation from the paper:

"The first column of Table 1 presents the fraction of blacks among drivers stopped in the full sample. Among drivers stopped during daylight, 49% were black; among drivers stopped when it was dark, 65% were black. Under the restrictive conditions discussed in Section 4.1, we can test for racial profiling by comparing these two numbers. If anything, this comparison suggests “reverse” racial profiling, because it shows that non-black drivers are disproportionately stopped during daylight when visibility is high. "

Where is the above paragraph found in that rand link?

did a word find and it doesn't come up

Not pp.
Page 884 toward the bottom of the first column of text.

Anonymous wrote:Honestly, what in the world are blacks thinking

Why in the World would any Officer wish to pull over a black man ? What motivation ?

The white officer must be thinking to himself
" shit , I think I'll just increase the odds of me dying today "
Or. " think I'll pull that black lady over just where I can deal with more drama in my life ". Or. " can't wait for the captain to demote me for pulling more black people over "

Get real. No white officer wants to deal with unreasonable people day in and day out. That's why whites are pulled over more often. That's why whites are killed far out of proportion than blacks

There'so going to be an uprising for sure. It's going to be the whites though. We're getting sick of all the blacks complaining about everything.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:All if you "it is what it is" people are complicit to injustice, violence and murder.

How do you sleep at night?

If you aren't part of the solution, you're part of the problem.


This white suburban mom says: Black Lives Matter!

This white suburban man says you are naive and ignorant
This white man has come across lots of colored thugs that get away with crimes instead of being locked up. You know nothing about what you think is going on. You are part of the problem. The WSOP that are enablers to the thugs.

Anonymous wrote:Honestly, what in the world are blacks thinking

Why in the World would any Officer wish to pull over a black man ? What motivation ?

The white officer must be thinking to himself
" shit , I think I'll just increase the odds of me dying today "
Or. " think I'll pull that black lady over just where I can deal with more drama in my life ". Or. " can't wait for the captain to demote me for pulling more black people over "

Get real. No white officer wants to deal with unreasonable people day in and day out. That's why whites are pulled over more often. That's why whites are killed far out of proportion than blacks

There'so going to be an uprising for sure. It's going to be the whites though. We're getting sick of all the blacks complaining about everything.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just want to say that I'm a white person who recognizes this as a real, unjust, dangerous and deadly reality. I will do whatever I can to help change it. It is a shameful practice, and I am ashamed and saddened by it.

It's hard to quantify. The Rand Corporation did a study covering an area that got a lot of complaints about racial profiling in traffic stops.

https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/reprints/2007/RAND_RP1253.pdf

The study covered the proportion of people pulled over during the day (when police could conceivably see the race of the driver) through dusk and at night. No profiling was found. Indeed, an interesting observation from the paper:

"The first column of Table 1 presents the fraction of blacks among drivers stopped in the full sample. Among drivers stopped during daylight, 49% were black; among drivers stopped when it was dark, 65% were black. Under the restrictive conditions discussed in Section 4.1, we can test for racial profiling by comparing these two numbers. If anything, this comparison suggests “reverse” racial profiling, because it shows that non-black drivers are disproportionately stopped during daylight when visibility is high. "

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just want to say that I'm a white person who recognizes this as a real, unjust, dangerous and deadly reality. I will do whatever I can to help change it. It is a shameful practice, and I am ashamed and saddened by it.

It's hard to quantify. The Rand Corporation did a study covering an area that got a lot of complaints about racial profiling in traffic stops.

https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/reprints/2007/RAND_RP1253.pdf

The study covered the proportion of people pulled over during the day (when police could conceivably see the race of the driver) through dusk and at night. No profiling was found. Indeed, an interesting observation from the paper:

"The first column of Table 1 presents the fraction of blacks among drivers stopped in the full sample. Among drivers stopped during daylight, 49% were black; among drivers stopped when it was dark, 65% were black. Under the restrictive conditions discussed in Section 4.1, we can test for racial profiling by comparing these two numbers. If anything, this comparison suggests “reverse” racial profiling, because it shows that non-black drivers are disproportionately stopped during daylight when visibility is high. "

Where is the above paragraph found in that rand link?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I just want to say that I'm a white person who recognizes this as a real, unjust, dangerous and deadly reality. I will do whatever I can to help change it. It is a shameful practice, and I am ashamed and saddened by it.

It's hard to quantify. The Rand Corporation did a study covering an area that got a lot of complaints about racial profiling in traffic stops.

https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/reprints/2007/RAND_RP1253.pdf

The study covered the proportion of people pulled over during the day (when police could conceivably see the race of the driver) through dusk and at night. No profiling was found. Indeed, an interesting observation from the paper:

"The first column of Table 1 presents the fraction of blacks among drivers stopped in the full sample. Among drivers stopped during daylight, 49% were black; among drivers stopped when it was dark, 65% were black. Under the restrictive conditions discussed in Section 4.1, we can test for racial profiling by comparing these two numbers. If anything, this comparison suggests “reverse” racial profiling, because it shows that non-black drivers are disproportionately stopped during daylight when visibility is high. "

Anonymous wrote:All if you "it is what it is" people are complicit to injustice, violence and murder.

How do you sleep at night?

If you aren't part of the solution, you're part of the problem.


This white suburban mom says: Black Lives Matter!