Anonymous wrote:Sergey Brin (of Google fame) and his ex wife did this for their children.
Anonymous wrote:The prior mayor of LA, Antio Villaraigosa did this--
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antonio_Villaraigosa#Personal_life
Personally, I'm not a fan because I wouldn't do it myself-- my last name and my spouse's last name are important to us. Our kids have a hyphenated last name. But I know there are others who don't place a ton of value on family history (no judgment) so why not create something new.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you'll end up doing a LOT of explaining if you go the mash up route, OP. If you're okay with that, go for it.
Why? Let's say that the adult last names in the family are Layhill and Newton, and the child's last name is Layton.
If you didn't know the parents' last names, why would you ask the parents about their child's last name of Layton? And if you did know the parents' last names, it seems rather obvious how the child got the last name of Layton, so why would you ask? I suppose you could ask, "Why did you give the child a combined last name?", if you wanted to be nosy, although again the answer seems obvious: because the parents thought it was a good idea.
Anonymous wrote:I've never heard of doing this and would strongly advise against it. Just seems weird and like you are trying way too hard.
Anonymous wrote:I think you'll end up doing a LOT of explaining if you go the mash up route, OP. If you're okay with that, go for it.
Anonymous wrote:Hyphenate the kids names. You keep yours, and he keeps his. Or you take the hyphenated last name and he keeps his (that's what we did).
But don't make up a new last name...it's ridiculous. Plus, you are ruining your family tree and denying your heritage.