Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no better retirement savings vehicle than the TSP. TSP is such a great deal because of the rock-bottom fees that are charged. A majority of mutual funds are linked to the US Total Stock Market, and the market's going to do what it'll do, so paying the tiniest of fees really gives TSP participants a leg-up. The investment industry's average annual fee is 1% (and can go way up from there). Vanguard's, the industry leader, is 0.18%. But the TSP's expense ratio is just 0.03% across all its funds.
https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-funds/low-cost
And the TSP's G-Fund is practically a free lunch. A short-term bond with long-term rates that NEVER LOSES VALUE? Sign me up, because it's not available anywhere else.
The Fed Dream = Retiring at 57 with 30+ years of service, and then immediately collecting each month a full & unreduced pension + a check from TSP that's drawing down a (hopefully) $2mil+ balance + a $1,300 check from the FERS Social Security Supplement until turning 62. Plus a reasonable-cost health/vision/dental coverage plan for life, along with great survivor benefits too. And then waiting all the way until 70 to collect SS.
But if you're a new fed hired after 01/01/2013, then you're screwed because of FERS-(F)RAE. You get the same pension, but are going to pay a lot more upfront for it.
Can this poster embellish a bit more on "The Fed Dream?" My DH is a federal employee, and he knows the details of retirement, etc. (He's 44 years old with 15 years of service, an annual salary of $158,000, and a TSP balance of $512,000.) Here are a few questions:
(1) Do I understand correctly that, in the FERS system, you get 30% of your highest salary each year in retirement if you worked 30 years?
(2) Is the FERS Social Security Supplement something that you pay for as an optional item?
(3) Do federal employees really get a reasonable-cost health/vision/dental coverage plan for life? (Can you embellish?)
Thank you!
(1) yes = 30% of highest three years
(2) special supplement is automatic if you qualify.
(3) same as what your DH's getting now as a Fed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is no better retirement savings vehicle than the TSP. TSP is such a great deal because of the rock-bottom fees that are charged. A majority of mutual funds are linked to the US Total Stock Market, and the market's going to do what it'll do, so paying the tiniest of fees really gives TSP participants a leg-up. The investment industry's average annual fee is 1% (and can go way up from there). Vanguard's, the industry leader, is 0.18%. But the TSP's expense ratio is just 0.03% across all its funds.
https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-funds/low-cost
And the TSP's G-Fund is practically a free lunch. A short-term bond with long-term rates that NEVER LOSES VALUE? Sign me up, because it's not available anywhere else.
The Fed Dream = Retiring at 57 with 30+ years of service, and then immediately collecting each month a full & unreduced pension + a check from TSP that's drawing down a (hopefully) $2mil+ balance + a $1,300 check from the FERS Social Security Supplement until turning 62. Plus a reasonable-cost health/vision/dental coverage plan for life, along with great survivor benefits too. And then waiting all the way until 70 to collect SS.
But if you're a new fed hired after 01/01/2013, then you're screwed because of FERS-(F)RAE. You get the same pension, but are going to pay a lot more upfront for it.
Can this poster embellish a bit more on "The Fed Dream?" My DH is a federal employee, and he knows the details of retirement, etc. (He's 44 years old with 15 years of service, an annual salary of $158,000, and a TSP balance of $512,000.) Here are a few questions:
(1) Do I understand correctly that, in the FERS system, you get 30% of your highest salary each year in retirement if you worked 30 years?
(2) Is the FERS Social Security Supplement something that you pay for as an optional item?
(3) Do federal employees really get a reasonable-cost health/vision/dental coverage plan for life? (Can you embellish?)
Thank you!
Anonymous wrote:There is no better retirement savings vehicle than the TSP. TSP is such a great deal because of the rock-bottom fees that are charged. A majority of mutual funds are linked to the US Total Stock Market, and the market's going to do what it'll do, so paying the tiniest of fees really gives TSP participants a leg-up. The investment industry's average annual fee is 1% (and can go way up from there). Vanguard's, the industry leader, is 0.18%. But the TSP's expense ratio is just 0.03% across all its funds.
https://investor.vanguard.com/mutual-funds/low-cost
And the TSP's G-Fund is practically a free lunch. A short-term bond with long-term rates that NEVER LOSES VALUE? Sign me up, because it's not available anywhere else.
The Fed Dream = Retiring at 57 with 30+ years of service, and then immediately collecting each month a full & unreduced pension + a check from TSP that's drawing down a (hopefully) $2mil+ balance + a $1,300 check from the FERS Social Security Supplement until turning 62. Plus a reasonable-cost health/vision/dental coverage plan for life, along with great survivor benefits too. And then waiting all the way until 70 to collect SS.
But if you're a new fed hired after 01/01/2013, then you're screwed because of FERS-(F)RAE. You get the same pension, but are going to pay a lot more upfront for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just passed 750k. hoping to pass 1 mil next 3-4 years.
How many years in? I'm at 14 years and have $375k.
NP. I'm 15 years and $450,000. Too conservative early on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The fund that tracks the S&P consistently returns less than the S&P - so yeah - the fund choices suck. I think many/most fed govt workers don't understand it - they're just thrilled at the amount they have after maxing out for 30 yrs. Put in the bare minimum to get the match, and then go to a Vanguard or Fidelity IRA - their funds actually manage to beat the market yr after yr, so the cost is worth it.
So clueless. So much bad advice in this post. Taxes not considered. Ignorant of difference between "Vanguard or Fidelity" funds vs. index funds. Completely wrong about any fund beating the market "year after year." Pretty much everything said in this post is wrong ... it's actually so wrong, I suspect it is a troll.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don't forget some people work at agencies with a 10% match and if you make over 180k that is another 18k right there annually.
which one matches 10%??
Anonymous wrote:Don't forget some people work at agencies with a 10% match and if you make over 180k that is another 18k right there annually.