Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I would have volunteered to stay at home so I did not have to go. My husband would be the one saying absolutely not everyone is attending the dinner.
Same here.
OP, be honest with yourself. Have your kids made scenes before in public that your FIL has witnessed or heard about? If so, there's nothing wrong with him wanting a nice dinner if your kids aren't able to behave.
Well, considering we all just came back from dinner out and the kids were well behaved, I really don't think this is the issue. It's that he wants to go somewhere that's not great for young kids. What's up with people assuming my kids are hellions?
OP, people here are also assuming that FIL is an "asshole" and that your husband doesn't have your back and...all kinds of crap. It's no surprise that someone's going to come on and rip your kids as well as your in-laws. Wait for them to rip you next, though all you did was vent some very understandable hurt feelings and you did it in a nice way. But that's DCUM. This forum in particular draws a lot of knee-jerk nitwits who exist just to slam any in-law, theirs or anyone else's.
You have said several times, in several different ways in your post and other follow-ups here, that your in-laws are nice and they help with the kids etc. I'd focus on that, and forget everything else. You also noted that you have to leave the next day and the kids may not do well when you're traveling if they're left with a babysitter that last night. While it's not exactly tactful for FIL to have asked what he did, please let the fact that your in-laws are helpful and are good to you trump the idea that FIL might have been less than perfectly polite. He likely wants some adult time with his son without the younger kids around, drawing some of son's focus. And there's nothing wrong with wanting to go to a restaurant that's not suitable for kids -- once in two weeks.
The idea that the kids were well behaved during one meal out I(in a more child-appropriate restaurant?) does not mean they'll be the same at the restaurant he has in mind. You know how kids this age can be perfect one day and restless and yakky and demanding the next day, even in identical circumstances. It doesn't make them hellions and it doesn't reflect badly on your parenting. It just means they're three.
And you're at the in-laws' place. It's easy for people on here to say "just find a babysitter" but do your in-laws even know know any babysitters in their area or have friends who have kids of an age that they'd want to babysit? Babysitters might have been off their radar for many years now. If they find some babysitter who's a stranger to both them and you, would you really enjoy the dinner if you spent the evening wondering if your kids were doing OK with a stranger, if they were going to be over-wound the next day during travel, etc.?
Big picture: You and your in-laws get along fine. Don't let one little thing upset that. It's not part of any pattern or a slap at you or even a slap at your kids, since you seem fine with the in-laws otherwise. By the time this dinner comes along you and your young kids will have been there for two weeks. That's a lot for some grandparents to take -- even if kids are well behaved. Giving FIL some adult time with your husband and older child can be your gift to him, if you can give it without resentment. I would be too frazzled by the hunt for a sitter etc. to enjoy the meal anyway.